- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ketanji Brown Jackson “It’s a Wonderful Life” is Fodder For White Supremacists in Oral Arg
Posted on 12/6/22 at 5:22 am to stormchaser_64
Posted on 12/6/22 at 5:22 am to stormchaser_64
quote:
“It’s A Wonderful Life” has an entirely white cast
3
Posted on 12/6/22 at 5:28 am to TrueTiger
Don't bring facts into her argument
Posted on 12/6/22 at 5:34 am to Jjdoc
Wth do these couples find one a thousand queer photographers to photograph their wedding?
Posted on 12/6/22 at 5:37 am to Bulldogblitz
I thought the cake ruling was pretty on point.
I can’t prohibit my completed work from being sold to anyone but I can’t be forced to do objectionable work based on my religious viewpoint.
And… based on that… she is an idiot.
I can’t prohibit my completed work from being sold to anyone but I can’t be forced to do objectionable work based on my religious viewpoint.
And… based on that… she is an idiot.
Posted on 12/6/22 at 6:01 am to Jjdoc
Can someone please explain her analogy to me? What KBJ said makes no sense. 
Posted on 12/6/22 at 6:16 am to Jjdoc
quote:The corollary rhetorical is if one did not want to support "‘It’s a Wonderful Life’ packages to non-white individuals,” should one be forced to associate their name with it anyway?
“I want to do video depictions of ‘It’s a Wonderful Life,’ and knowing that movie very well, I want to be authentic, and so only white children and families can be customers for that particular product. Everybody else can, I’ll give to everybody else I’ll sell them anything they want, just not the ‘It’s a Wonderful Life’ depictions,” Ketanji Brown Jackson said. “I‘m expressing something, right? For the purposes of that speech. I can say anti-discrimination laws can’t make me sell ‘It’s a Wonderful Life’ packages to non-white individuals.”
This post was edited on 12/6/22 at 7:02 am
Posted on 12/6/22 at 6:20 am to Jjdoc
Diversity hire (Biden blatantly said this) gonna diversity hire.
Posted on 12/6/22 at 6:25 am to Gifman
KKK member goes to black photographers and asks them to take pictures of their cross burning.
What would Jackson say?
Black Christian bakers asked to bake abortion and tranny cakes. They say no.
How does she rule?
What would Jackson say?
Black Christian bakers asked to bake abortion and tranny cakes. They say no.
How does she rule?
Posted on 12/6/22 at 6:47 am to stormchaser_64
quote:
Justice Jackson is proposing a hypothetical scenario in which a video artist offers to film recreations of “It’s A Wonderful Life” featuring the clients who purchase the service. Justice Jackson is specifically asking whether using the justification of maintaining historical racial verisimilitude of the original film to deny this service to people of color would be protected as speech, or whether this would violate the rights of such clients. “It’s A Wonderful Life” has an entirely white cast, so if an artist refused to film a recreation featuring people of color on the grounds that in order to be authentic and true to the original film, the actors in the recreation must be white, would that be sufficient to pass muster under the current laws? Maybe so, or maybe not, but either answer gives us a clearer definition of the principles in question in this case.
What a moronic take. There are tons of examples of “re-makes” already in existence.
In short, find someone else to do the job, or do it yourself. This is tantamount to compelled speech, which isn’t surprising coming from the left, especially when you consider that this guy is a secret idol of the communazis:
Posted on 12/6/22 at 6:58 am to TrueTiger
Thank you
Oh and I think Mr Potter IDd as hispanic. Probably.
Oh and I think Mr Potter IDd as hispanic. Probably.
Posted on 12/6/22 at 7:05 am to TrueTiger
quote:
I've been saving this money for a divorce, if ever I get a husband.
Posted on 12/6/22 at 7:07 am to Jjdoc
No
Mean
Tweets
Mean
Tweets
Posted on 12/6/22 at 7:08 am to Jjdoc
Black people under the protection of white people are free to be as racist as they choose to be, and many don't mind being a piece of shite.
Posted on 12/6/22 at 7:16 am to stormchaser_64
quote:
Maybe so, or maybe not, but either answer gives us a clearer definition of the principles in question in this case
No, it doesn't.
Freedom of speech includes the right to NOT speak, and to selectively speak, and not to be compelled to speak in a fashion you object to or disagree with.
The Court fricked up when it only took up the free speech part of this and not the freedom of religion part of this this. The latter is cleaner, and is imminently easier to support.
You can't compel Jewish or Muslim butchers to serve products that do not conform to their religious doctrines.
Posted on 12/6/22 at 7:20 am to Jjdoc
She's flat out stupid and a racist POS.
Posted on 12/6/22 at 7:58 am to Jjdoc
Sad.
Afraid that it’s only going to get worse.
Afraid that it’s only going to get worse.
Posted on 12/6/22 at 7:59 am to DefensorFortis
quote:
WRONG…men wanting men is not immutable nor moral. It’s deviancy.
Is pedophilia immutable? According to current academia it is.
American liberals…a mind is a terrible thing to waste.
I'm just pointing out the current law, not saying I agree with it.
95% of this board has the reading comprehension of a 1st grader when someone simply tries to clarify what the other side is arguing.
Posted on 12/6/22 at 8:00 am to TrueTiger
quote:
People figured it out but none were persuaded because she did such a horrible job with analogy selection.
Most of the people in this thread were slackjawed, not unmoved.
Posted on 12/6/22 at 8:02 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
What a moronic take.
Explaining her argument isn't a "take".
Posted on 12/6/22 at 8:03 am to Jjdoc
Is she submitting her own strawmen into the arguments? Is she suggesting we must outlaw all white films?
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News