- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ketanji Brown Jackson Cites the Black Codes as Constitutional in Gun Control Case
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:21 am to ReauxlTide222
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:21 am to ReauxlTide222
She wants to start the process of overruling Bruen
1
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:22 am to SlowFlowPro
Do Supreme Court justices typically start personal missions to overturn past rulings? 
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:25 am to ReauxlTide222
Uh yeah. Look at the progeny of Rowe for about 50 years of this from socially conservative justices over the years.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:26 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
Ketanji Jackson appears to argue that because an unconstitutional law was for a time on the books that it can be used as precedent? Am I grasping this correctly, because that’s just loony.
That's a more retarded take than what KBJ was trying to do
Totally conservative or Libertarian or whatever, TDSFP is the first comment defending KBJ.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:26 am to BTROleMisser
quote:
Totally conservative or Libertarian or whatever, TDSFP is the first comment defending KBJ
This post was edited on 1/21/26 at 9:27 am
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:27 am to KCT
quote:
quote:
at's a more retarded take than what KBJ was trying to do
For a "conservative" you sure go easy on the brain-dead lefties. You know, it just seems a little 'strange" that a conservative would do that
His TDS is insane. Any stance he perceives "Trumpers" taking, he reflexively takes the opposite one.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:27 am to BTROleMisser
quote:
His TDS is insane. Any stance he perceives "Trumpers" taking, he reflexively takes the opposite one.
Oh boy
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:27 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
9 fricking posts already
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:29 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
His TDS is insane. Any stance he perceives "Trumpers" taking, he reflexively takes the opposite one.
Oh boy
Truth hurts.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:31 am to BTROleMisser
quote:
Truth hurts.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:31 am to RohanGonzales
quote:
9 fricking posts already
Some people want to learn and are being given insight.
Some people are showing their lack of intelligence and are requesting mockery
What's your issue?
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:33 am to Jbird
This idiot makes AOC look like the head of MENSA.
She doesn’t have a clue what she is doing
She doesn’t have a clue what she is doing
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:34 am to Jbird
Justice Brown is totally unqualified to be a judge on any court. What she is trying to do in that clip is intellectually dishonest. Not surprised to see another retard offering up a defense of her.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:59 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There's a USSC case Bruen that created a test that involves a historical analysis
Bruen did not creat the test it affirmed the test as provided by DC v Heller.
quote:New York Rifle and Pistol v Bruen.
Under Heller, when the Second Amendment’s plain text covers an individual’s conduct, the Constitution presumptively protects that conduct, and to justify a firearm regulation the government must demonstrate that the regulation is consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.
In McDonald v Chicago, SCOTUS applied the two part test to the states.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 10:07 am to Jbird
Ketanji should set DEI back 100 years.
But it won't.
But it won't.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 10:08 am to Riverside
"Totally unqualified........" I caught her confirmation hearing with Senator Kennedy leading the questioning. He asked her 4 basic ABC-type legal questions . She answered, to each one, that either she didn't know the answers or had any experience with those issues. Kennedy just sat there rolling his eyes & shaking his head. She's now a Federal judge for life.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 10:27 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Whatcha got for me?
There are actually very few 2nd Amendment rights cases. The first important case was DC v Heller in which DC banned the possession of handguns. Scalia wrote the opinion in which he analyzed the the 2nd amendment and then articulated a two part test in analyzing 2nd amendment cases. !st is whether the 2nd amendment is implicated, then the Constitution protects that behavior and the burden is on the state to show that there exist a history of gun regulation to justify the present regulation. In that Heller only concerned a federal law, the states took the position that it did not apply to the states. McDonald v Chicago rejected this argument.
An issue that has yet to be decided is when looking for historical regulations to support the law have far back do you go. When the 2nd amendment was passed in 1791 it only applied to the federal government Not until the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments were passed did the BIll of rights apply to the States.
So now the issue is how far back do you have to go to find gun regulations that would support modern regulations. For real 2nd Amendment supporters one must look to the 1790's to find supporting analogs. For gun controllers they want to use the period after the Civil war,. Their problem is most if not all of these laws are based on race and are unconstitutional. The gun controllers are so desperate to find some historical support they appear to be willing to overlook that part including Jackson.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News