- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kansas teacher wins federal case, will not be forced to use students' preferred pronouns
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:48 am to squid_hunt
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:48 am to squid_hunt
quote:
Which is why the gay groups push to get them poisoned and transitioned as fast as possible. No turning back.
From my experience (3 teenagers), this is 10000% truth. Kids get out of what the media is pushing around 15-16. It has been shocking how many 11-14 year old's think they are gay/trans/etc. Then move on. All 3 of my kids noticed the change from people in school.
1
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:51 am to WPBTiger
quote:
that were inconsistent with their biological sex.
There is no such thing as biological science. There is just sex. Sex is based on biology, saying biological sex is redundant meaningless and playing into the hands of the crazy liberals.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 9:13 am to Stingray
quote:OK
There is no such thing as biological science.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 9:16 am to Big Gorilla
quote:
It has been shocking how many 11-14 year old's think they are gay/trans/etc. Then move on. All 3 of my kids noticed the change from people in school.
Children get their identity from their social structure. If you don't tell them who they are and who they are supposed to be as a parent, someone else will. That's why the left has pushed so hard with the self discovery indoctrination. While you are playing good, hands off parent, they're whispering perversion in your child's ear.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 9:28 am to WPBTiger
Where ever someone implements one of these insane policies that I will be forced to follow, my preferred pronoun will be --
My f*cking king and daddy
My f*cking king and daddy
Posted on 5/17/22 at 9:29 am to Big Gorilla
quote:
My son had a friend that wanted us to use they/them as her pronouns. I quickly responded "no chance".
I'd just start referring to her as Crazy Woke F*cking C*nt.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 9:32 am to MMauler
My nephew's kid wants to be called Maddox instead of her real name of Madison. Demanded I use they, them or Maddox. Told her to frick off.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 9:37 am to WPBTiger
The SCOTUS has already ruled that the First Amendment only applies to public employees when they act as private citizens and not when they’re in course and scope
of their employment.
Now that was on speech ground not religious, but I honestly Don’t see that being enough of a distinction.
And that was Alito, Scalia, Thomas, Roberts and Kennedy ruling that way.
of their employment.
Now that was on speech ground not religious, but I honestly Don’t see that being enough of a distinction.
And that was Alito, Scalia, Thomas, Roberts and Kennedy ruling that way.
This post was edited on 5/17/22 at 9:41 am
Posted on 5/17/22 at 9:50 am to squid_hunt
Good hands off parents will have their hands on firearms or torches and pitchforks soon.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 9:53 am to WPBTiger
Kansas once again proves that it is a picture of real America.
More than Missouri will ever be.
More than Missouri will ever be.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 9:55 am to WPBTiger
Posted on 5/17/22 at 10:10 am to AggieHank86
quote:
It was a pretty simple 1st Amendment case. Result was never in doubt.
If this were to reach the Supreme Court, do you think the decision would be unanimous? I have my doubts that the liberal judges would think it is "a pretty simple 1st Amendment case."
Posted on 5/17/22 at 10:18 am to deathvalleytiger10
quote:Possible, but 8-1 is the most-likely result, with Sotomayor on her own.
If this were to reach the Supreme Court, do you think the decision would be unanimous?
Posted on 5/17/22 at 10:19 am to SammyTiger
quote:
The SCOTUS has already ruled that the First Amendment only applies to public employees when they act as private citizens and not when they’re in course and scope
of their employment.
The Supreme Court has been indicating that they see the clear and present danger of the radical left and their agenda to destroy all dissent. I would be hopeful. Did they just rule on this in a college case?
Posted on 5/17/22 at 10:20 am to AggieHank86
The conservatives already rules that public servant give up their freedom of speech when acting in their official capacity.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 10:21 am to deathvalleytiger10
quote:
I have my doubts that the liberal judges would think it is "a pretty simple 1st Amendment case."
No chance its 9-0. Liberal judges can't even define what a woman is...likely the vote would be 6-3.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 10:24 am to SammyTiger
NYPost
Never mind, it was 6th Circuit. Downvote all you want, little Sammy. Times are changing.
Never mind, it was 6th Circuit. Downvote all you want, little Sammy. Times are changing.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 10:27 am to squid_hunt
I love a judiciary that changes their mind based on whether they like the speech being protected.
I’m getting downvotes.
I didn't Decide the case, Alito, Scalia, Thomas, Roberts and Kennedy did.
I’m getting downvotes.
I didn't Decide the case, Alito, Scalia, Thomas, Roberts and Kennedy did.
This post was edited on 5/17/22 at 10:36 am
Posted on 5/17/22 at 10:41 am to Yaboylsu63
quote:
This sets an important precedent, does it not?
PT lawyers, can you elaborate on if this will have bigger effects than just this woman getting some justice?
Hope so, cause those 3 boys in WI getting charged with Sexual Harassment for not calling a classmate they/them, need the help on a future lawsuit.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 10:48 am to SammyTiger
quote:
love a judiciary that changes their mind based on whether they like the speech being protected.
I bet you do.
Changing your political definitions every five minutes doesn't mean your government employer can force others to espouse your political beliefs. What next? Loyalty oaths and hailing our grand leader?
This post was edited on 5/17/22 at 10:49 am
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News