- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kansas teacher wins federal case, will not be forced to use students' preferred pronouns
Posted on 5/17/22 at 3:40 pm to Flats
Posted on 5/17/22 at 3:40 pm to Flats
States establishing one faith’s definition of marriage over others bothered me more.
Strained logic but right results. Gay marriage always seemed like a blatant establishment issue to me.
Strained logic but right results. Gay marriage always seemed like a blatant establishment issue to me.
This post was edited on 5/17/22 at 3:42 pm
1
Posted on 5/17/22 at 3:43 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
States establishing one faith’s definition of marriage over others bothered me more.
But we still have that.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 3:46 pm to WPBTiger
frick all these people who insist on this inane nonsense.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 3:52 pm to Flats
It’s a pretty neat feature of some faiths that allowing others to practice along side them somehow mean they can’t practice theirs.
The state recognized Catholic marriages still?
What about baptist?
I know there are licenses But in LA you still need a ceremony.
The state recognized Catholic marriages still?
What about baptist?
I know there are licenses But in LA you still need a ceremony.
This post was edited on 5/17/22 at 3:57 pm
Posted on 5/17/22 at 5:51 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
It’s a pretty neat feature of some faiths that allowing others to practice along side them somehow mean they can’t practice theirs.
I have no idea what that's supposed to mean but it's irrelevant. The court picked a definition that some people liked and some people didn't and imposed it on the country. And they left in place other prohibitions, like people who want to marry 12 year olds, because they like those prohibitions.
Shallow thinkers somehow believe that telling someone "this is wrong" is a value judgement but that telling them "this is right" is NOT a value judgement. They're both value judgements, and that's what you claim you don't want the judiciary doing. You like it just fine as long as you agree with them.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 6:33 pm to Flats
quote:
And they left in place other prohibitions, like people who want to marry 12 year olds, because they like those prohibitions.
Or marrying close family members.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 6:36 pm to the808bass
quote:
Or marrying close family members.
Puritanical fascists, I tell you. Socons just LOVE forcing their morality on others.
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News