Started By
Message

re: Kamala it is - has over 500 delegates pledged to her already

Posted on 7/22/24 at 8:08 am to
Posted by LSUFreek
Greater New Orleans
Member since Jan 2007
15900 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 8:08 am to
There's almost 4,000 delegates.

Kamala needs 1,986 delegates to win the nomination.

500+ is a nice quick start, but it's not a done deal yet.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466723 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 8:09 am to
quote:

when he can list her VP accomplishments


wait what?

VPs are basically ceremonial positions other than being the tying vote in the Senate (which she did do many times, IIRC)
Posted by Broadside Bob
Atlanta, GA
Member since Dec 2012
1632 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 8:09 am to
quote:


Good point, can any of you guys blame the Democrats for ditching Biden? You all know how terrible he is. If the tables were turned Republicans would do the same thing.


I don't blame them for ditching him. I blame them for concealing his dementia for so long.

And if he ain't fit to run, he ain't fit to be president now.
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
26366 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 8:09 am to
quote:

Because she’s been obviously incompetent for 4 years. It’s not even debatable. I’ll believe he’s voting for the best candidate when he can list her VP accomplishments with data to support.


Wouldn't you say the same thing about Biden? How does this change anything? You didn't think voting for Biden was "party before country?"
Posted by c on z
Zamunda
Member since Mar 2009
130446 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 8:10 am to
quote:

Because she’s been obviously incompetent for 4 years. It’s not even debatable. I’ll believe he’s voting for the best candidate when he can list her VP accomplishments with data to support.

Breaking the record for most tie breaking votes on legislation ought to be something to hang her hat on.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
93717 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 8:11 am to
Exactly. How fricking embarrassing for you ppl

Bunch of clowns
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466723 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 8:11 am to
quote:

Wouldn't you say the same thing about Biden? How does this change anything? You didn't think voting for Biden was "party before country?"

Post needs to be bookmarked for 4 years when they push JD Vance
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
88906 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 8:15 am to
quote:

waiting for 2028 when the DEMs are likely to be favored
Explain

Is that because the party in office typically has a hard time beating the other after 8 years(or 4 I guess)?

Why’d you say likely?
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
88906 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 8:17 am to
quote:

Breaking the record for most tie breaking votes on legislation ought to be something to hang her hat on.
PSA #16483627

c on z enjoys trolling. Don’t let him get get under your skin. Especially on the MSB
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
88906 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 8:19 am to
quote:

How does voting for his original choice's VP change anything?
I know damn well you aren’t this stupid
Posted by Vandyrone
Nashville, TN
Member since Dec 2012
7852 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 8:20 am to
quote:

They must be planning on cheating more than 2020.

This. They’re taunting the country now by picking the most unelectable candidate and blatantly cheating their way to victory.

ETA: She must be the most compromised option or the most willing to live in the gilded cage. That’s how Biden was chosen.
This post was edited on 7/22/24 at 8:23 am
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
66801 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 8:21 am to
Never forget. "Do we now just say that this process didn't matter? That the voters don't have a say?"

This post was edited on 7/22/24 at 8:22 am
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
44890 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 8:23 am to
quote:

Wouldn't you say the same thing about Biden? How does this change anything? You didn't think voting for Biden was "party before country?"


2020 election there was at least the argument that he would be a good president based upon his lifelong political “service.”

This election, it was surely a party before country vote and just as disgusting stance as voting for fake black Kamala.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466723 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 8:23 am to
quote:

Explain

Is that because the party in office typically has a hard time beating the other after 8 years(or 4 I guess)?


This + the reaction to Trump/MAGA winning this year + no successor to Trump.

The 2028 DEM organization/reaction is going to be similar to 2020 and they will get a ton of people out to vote.

The 2028 GOP primary is likely going to be the biggest shite show of shite shows, like 2016 without a person like Trump to win it. Lots of black eyes, sore feelings, etc. will create damaged candidates and likely lower turnout.

There is also the economic time bomb that's looming. If that bursts during Trump's term, the GOP is dead in 2028 even without the 2 things above.
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
44890 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 8:29 am to
quote:

There is also the economic time bomb that's looming. If that bursts during Trump's term, the GOP is dead in 2028 even without the 2 things above.


I think it bursts next year and he spends the entirety of his presidency getting us back to something half close to today.
Posted by DawginSC
Member since Aug 2022
7753 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 8:30 am to
quote:


There won't be an "open" process - this is all fake shite.

Obama will seal the deal by coming out at the DNC and endorsing her in effort to boost her.

This is all strategic gameplay.

It's hilarious that democratic voters think they "elected" Biden.


People seem to be mighty confused on how the primary/caucus process works for the two major parties.

When we vote in primaries or attend caucuses, what we actually vote for is to determine which candidate gets to select what number of delegates for the party convention.

In the case of the democrats, the meant that Biden got to choose 3,896 delegates. Two other minor candidates got to choose 7. In the case of the GOP, Trump got to select 2268 delegates, Haley got to select 97 and other minor candidates got to select 12 others (All from the Iowa delegation).

Those delegates get to choose the presidential candidate for the party at the nominating convention, which just happened for the GOP and won't happen until August 13th or so for the Democrats.

They are pledged to vote for the candidate who selected them unless that candidate refuses the nomination or dies. This happened in 1968 with the Democrats where LBJ quit the race after early primaries and Robert Kennedy was assassinated. In those cases those delegates become unpledged (in 1968 they went for LBJ VP Hubert Humphries).

Biden's hand picked delegates will largely do whatever Biden asks them to do (in this case supporting Harris). This isn't "incorrect". This is how it is supposed to work. If the unthinkable happened and Trump was assassinated before the convention, Trump's hand picked delegates would have determined who the GOP presidential candidate would be. It wouldn't be an open process for all Republicans to choose again. It would be Trumps picks making the call on who the successor would be.

In the case of the Democrats, it's Biden's picks who make that call. The difference is Biden can actually tell them who he'd like them to support.

The nominating process isn't a federal election. The party determines who their nominee will be. The Democratic and Republican parties just use a combination of primaries and caucuses as part of their process for choosing the delegates who select their presidential candidate. Other parties like the libertarians don't do that. They just have a group of insiders make the selection.
This post was edited on 7/22/24 at 8:31 am
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
88906 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 8:32 am to
quote:

Okay, flip it around.
What the frick dude.

This shite started 4 fricking years ago when they hid this mfer in a basement and tricked you retards into voting for him.

A “tragedy” did not strike.

The Dems are in this position because of their own, evil actions.

Something has fricking happened to y’all. Y’all are not of sound mind. The rational y’all use is so absolutely fricked.
Posted by DownSouthJukin
1x tRant Poster of the Millennium
Member since Jan 2014
31442 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 8:33 am to
quote:

I think it’s wild that so many pledged without her giving a single speech or platform of her policies


This was obviously a done deal. Kamala has been working behind Biden’s back on this since the debate. And maybe before. When the news was reporting that Jill and Hunter were basically calling the shots for Biden, it was clear he was abandoned or was going to be abandoned.

Think about that: Biden and Co. got outsmarted and outmaneuvered by Kamala Harris.

Unreal.
This post was edited on 7/22/24 at 8:35 am
Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
12646 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 8:35 am to
They gave Biden the boot because he was tanking in the polls and had no chance to win, not because he's out of his mind. He's been out of his mind for years, but it just became too obvious at the debate to pretend anymore.
So they will do the same with Kamala. See how she polls, add in the amount of cheating they can do, and see if it will get her close enough to win. If not, maybe they try somebody else.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
109730 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 8:40 am to
quote:

They gave Biden the boot because he was tanking in the polls and had no chance to win, not because he's out of his mind.


There’s out of his mind and there’s completely unable to function on even the most basic level. I think they realized how quickly he was reaching the latter point, and the panic we are seeing is the most obvious response.

I’m not sure they know what gives them a “better chance to win” or even if one alternative reasonably exists over any others.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram