- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kamala Harris declines podcast interview with Joe Rogan.
Posted on 10/23/24 at 11:29 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Posted on 10/23/24 at 11:29 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
So Trump will be on? If he asked her he must have asked Trump too
Posted on 10/23/24 at 11:30 am to texag7
quote:
She’s too stupid to talk for 30 minutes without a teleprompter
Posted on 10/23/24 at 11:30 am to TiptonInSC
quote:
Brett broke her
This. I think my first post after that interview was to say something along the lines of it guaranteeing she wouldn't be doing a Rogan interview. For the first time in her run she got a legitimate taste of an objective interview and she didn't like it one bit.
Posted on 10/23/24 at 11:31 am to RohanGonzales
quote:
Are you old enough to remember or is that a guess?
Vaguely. I was 9
Posted on 10/23/24 at 11:32 am to anc
quote:
McCain ran a terrible campaign. Let’s not discount that because he was “on our side”
It was not very good that's true. Its nothing compared to this one. Harris is running an absolutely abysmal campaign. Everything she could do wrong she pretty much has
Posted on 10/23/24 at 11:32 am to RougeDawg
Yes Trump will be on Friday.
Posted on 10/23/24 at 11:32 am to texag7
quote:
She’s too stupid to talk for multiple hours without a teleprompter
What I think is that she’s too disengenuous and phony and afraid that something revealing comes out. Camela is a politician to the core and a very cautious one. She does not like to take risks.
Examples-
While she’s for reparations for blacks, she’d be very cautious about talking about it in certain circles.
She is for the green new deal but she’d be very careful about who she revealed it to.
Same for any marginal issue.
Going on Rogen was probably a wide open proposition and she didn’t want that. She wants a controlled interview where her team dictates the agenda. Rogen wouldn’t agree- so she’s out
This post was edited on 10/23/24 at 11:34 am
Posted on 10/23/24 at 11:34 am to RougeDawg
Trump is on Rogan Friday. I am sure for security reasons a lot of airing/taping details are falsely given.
I imagine Trump will be in Tx to campaign for someone and pop in.
I imagine Trump will be in Tx to campaign for someone and pop in.
Posted on 10/23/24 at 11:37 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
They didn’t directly ask, but they let it be known to Joe Rogan‘s crew that she would only take scripted questions with scripted responses. No follow ups. And no going off script. His side just laughed at her. Therefore, no interview.
I’d put damn good money on this is how it went down.
I’d put damn good money on this is how it went down.
Posted on 10/23/24 at 11:41 am to tiger1616
quote:
She can’t handle an interview, even those with softball questions, yet we’re to believe she can handle foreign leaders
So true. When she raised her voice and had a mini tantrum during the Fox interview, I wondered how Putin would react to her trying that shite.
He's probably laugh in her face and say, " Ma'am please. I am not your husband, your emotional outbursts won't work in me." Lol
Posted on 10/23/24 at 11:44 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
The worst campaign since Dukakis. Will be studied in textbooks how bad it is.
And she still has a very good chance at winning. If PA goes her way, which is still likely, then she might be sitting in the oval office.
McCain, Dole, Mondale and Dukakis ran hopeless campaigns. There was pretty much zero chance they could win and the effort behind their campaigns showed it.
Now Romney... After the first debate, if he ran an even competent campaign, he could have won or been very, very close. They got an advantage and then completely backed off and took almost all the pressure off Obama and didn't take a single opportunity to hammer what was a very weak first term. It was the most cowardly and weak campaign I've ever seen following that debate.
Posted on 10/23/24 at 11:45 am to RolltidePA
quote:
And she still has a very good chance at winning.
Man, I don't see it. I think the momentum is out of control and she could lose very badly. I guess you never know though
Posted on 10/23/24 at 11:48 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
No shite. She needs to only go on the shows of media allies...who will allow her to use the teleprompter, and gently steer her back in the right direction when she veers too far off course. She may sit down with oprah a few more times election day.
Posted on 10/23/24 at 11:50 am to Fun Bunch
There is no coherent campaign on the left. Are they the change candidates? Have the last four years have been awesome? They have never been able to figure that out.
Blumpf is bad doesn’t work when immigration and the economy are the top issues for non liberal voters
Blumpf is bad doesn’t work when immigration and the economy are the top issues for non liberal voters
Posted on 10/23/24 at 11:54 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Yet didn't she accuse Trump of hiding??
Posted on 10/23/24 at 11:55 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
All her hiding from interviews and questions just show everyone how bad she knows she is. A person confident in their positions on policies would willing to debate their position in hopes of changing minds to their side. This lady has not achieved anything on her own merit in her entire life and the Democrats want to scam the voters into sliding her into the oval office. This should bankrupt the DNC but they are saved by laundering illegal donations from foreign sources and government money in the form of kickbacks.
Posted on 10/23/24 at 11:56 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Man, I don't see it. I think the momentum is out of control and she could lose very badly. I guess you never know though
She really doesn't even need to run a campaign. The Northeast and West give her a big head start and she just show up in a few deeply democratic cities a few times like Philadelphia, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, Pittsburgh, Atlanta, Detroit etc. Sit back and let the dem machine do their work, count on some of the usual shenanigans and win the election.
Momentum and public will can be heavily against her, but end of the day if she squeaks across the line in PA and Michigan, through a mild cheat in a couple cities, it's over.
Posted on 10/23/24 at 11:57 am to Fun Bunch
I would argue this is the worst campaign in history, including the three Democrat campaigns in the 80s - Carter-Mondale-Dukakis
Dole '96 was a terrible campaign, and McCain '08 was the worst of my lifetime until this one.
Carter and Mondale were just overmatched. Dukakis is a lot like Harris - he was a moron.
Dole was a much better candidate than his results showed - hence a terrible campaign. Maybe McCain was up against a machine that wasn't going to be beaten, but he didn't even try in Florida and his Ohio campaign was awful. I'd argue that his loss in '08 is why Virginia has been off the table ever since. Maybe it comes back this year.
shite, McCain SUSPENDED his campaign after he accepted the nomination as a campaign strategy.
Kerry in 2004 ran a masterful campaign. He just lost Ohio by less than 2 points. If he wins Ohio, he wins the White House. Dude was camped out in Ohio for a month before the election. Polls showed he was going to win the state.
Kamala is all over the place. PA-MI-WI is her easiest path and she's spending all this time in the Sun Belt trying to pick off Georgia and North Carolina. If I'm advising her, I'm moving all resources the last 10 days to PA-MI-Wi. She's sitting at a 26% chance of winning all three and that's her best path.
Dole '96 was a terrible campaign, and McCain '08 was the worst of my lifetime until this one.
Carter and Mondale were just overmatched. Dukakis is a lot like Harris - he was a moron.
Dole was a much better candidate than his results showed - hence a terrible campaign. Maybe McCain was up against a machine that wasn't going to be beaten, but he didn't even try in Florida and his Ohio campaign was awful. I'd argue that his loss in '08 is why Virginia has been off the table ever since. Maybe it comes back this year.
shite, McCain SUSPENDED his campaign after he accepted the nomination as a campaign strategy.
Kerry in 2004 ran a masterful campaign. He just lost Ohio by less than 2 points. If he wins Ohio, he wins the White House. Dude was camped out in Ohio for a month before the election. Polls showed he was going to win the state.
Kamala is all over the place. PA-MI-WI is her easiest path and she's spending all this time in the Sun Belt trying to pick off Georgia and North Carolina. If I'm advising her, I'm moving all resources the last 10 days to PA-MI-Wi. She's sitting at a 26% chance of winning all three and that's her best path.
This post was edited on 10/23/24 at 12:03 pm
Posted on 10/23/24 at 11:57 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
I was told by Bonkers119 that there was no way she was turning this down.
Posted on 10/23/24 at 12:04 pm to UncleRuckus
quote:She's incapable of speaking for more than 3 minutes without a teleprompter.
She’s incapable of speaking for two hours
Popular
Back to top


2










