- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:59 pm to BBONDS25
quote:I think the majority of practitioners now would say "no".
Yes or no. Is someone with gender dysphoria mentally ill not not.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:59 pm to BBONDS25
quote:Doesn’t make it much better. You’d still exclude damn near every veteran. The psychiatrist in the family actually laughed when I asked her about this.
Jesus youre dumb. I specifically said aSPD. How the frick did you miss that?.
quote:Then I have no idea
And I didn’t say I would ban a thing
what you’re arguing about
Posted on 9/4/25 at 2:01 pm to Taxing Authority
He’s doing that thing where he’s not taking a position, just pointing out hypocrisy.
(It’s clear what his position is)
(It’s clear what his position is)
Posted on 9/4/25 at 2:02 pm to imjustafatkid
This:
“has been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to any mental institution.”
Does not mean
We don't allow the mentally ill to own firearms.
Its a case by case basis as it should be.
A court or doctor giving a determination that an individual is mentally incompetent or a danger to other is a reasonable exception imo but that is a very low percent of folks suffering from mental illness And less than 1% of gun violence is committed by folks suffering from mental illness. I'll post this again to get your thoughts
I dont think you folks understand how broad a spectrum of disorders encompasses the term mental illness. Years ago I suffered from severe depression and relapse of panic disorder after an attempted home invasion where 4 thugs tried to kill me.in my garage...Luckily they were terrible shots and I got away but it fricked me up mentally for a while. I already owned firearm but wanted another. I had a shrink and was on meds to deal with the panic attacks and help me sleep... I also bought several more firearms. Should I not have been allowed too?
“has been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to any mental institution.”
Does not mean
We don't allow the mentally ill to own firearms.
Its a case by case basis as it should be.
A court or doctor giving a determination that an individual is mentally incompetent or a danger to other is a reasonable exception imo but that is a very low percent of folks suffering from mental illness And less than 1% of gun violence is committed by folks suffering from mental illness. I'll post this again to get your thoughts
I dont think you folks understand how broad a spectrum of disorders encompasses the term mental illness. Years ago I suffered from severe depression and relapse of panic disorder after an attempted home invasion where 4 thugs tried to kill me.in my garage...Luckily they were terrible shots and I got away but it fricked me up mentally for a while. I already owned firearm but wanted another. I had a shrink and was on meds to deal with the panic attacks and help me sleep... I also bought several more firearms. Should I not have been allowed too?
Posted on 9/4/25 at 2:02 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Doesn’t make it much better. You’d still exclude damn near every veteran. The psychiatrist in the family actually laughed when I asked her about this.
That’s false. This is about transgenders who have shown the last few years an increase in mental illness and a huge spike in violence. The proposal isn’t for veterans or medications. We understand the slippery slope argument but you and others are making it about that instead of the violence and mental illness of trans.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 2:02 pm to BBONDS25
quote:Indeed it is. You used the term “psychopath” previously.
Is that not transgenderism?
quote:Like I said… if you want to presume every person have any experience with gender dysphoria is a dangerous “psychopath” have at it.
Was that not the question?
Posted on 9/4/25 at 2:03 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
Look up what “adjudicated” means.
Look up what ASPD means. No way you’re in the medical field.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 2:03 pm to MFn GIMP
100% against this.
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED is written that way for a reason. I you give these people a millimeter of gun control, they're going for it all.
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED is written that way for a reason. I you give these people a millimeter of gun control, they're going for it all.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 2:03 pm to JKeller34
quote:
We understand the slippery slope argument but you and others are making it about that instead of the violence and mental illness of trans.
you obviously do not
Posted on 9/4/25 at 2:03 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
I think the majority of practitioners now would say "no".
That may be what they say…but they know that’s a political answer.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 2:04 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:Exactly. But some like the take guns first due process later approach. Same people must Looooove civil asset forfeiture laws.
Correct. Honestly, it’s less about the “mental defect” part and more about the “adjudicated” part.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 2:05 pm to Captain Rumbeard
quote:
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED is written that way for a reason. I you give these people a millimeter of gun control, they're going for it all.
And posted in this thread are acting like this is the first infringement. While doing so some are advocating for mentally ill transgenders instead of states who infringe it everyday for less.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 2:05 pm to BarnHater
quote:
It’s time to lock up all transgenders. They deserve no rights, and should be considered a threat to America.
You'd have made an excellent and useful little Nazi back in the 1930s!
This post was edited on 9/4/25 at 2:06 pm
Posted on 9/4/25 at 2:05 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Same people must Looooove civil asset forfeiture laws.
We're only taking the money from drug dealers and violent criminals, not everyday people!
Posted on 9/4/25 at 2:05 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Doesn’t make it much better. You’d still exclude damn near every veteran. The psychiatrist in the family actually laughed when I asked her about this.
He asked for a definition of psychopath. I provided it. All that other bullshite you typed is supposition.
quote:
Then I have no idea what you’re arguing about
clearly. Posted on 9/4/25 at 2:06 pm to JKeller34
quote:
This is about transgenders who have shown the last few years an increase in mental illness and a huge spike in violence. The proposal isn’t for veterans or medications. We understand the slippery slope argument but you and others are making it about that instead of the violence and mental illness of trans.
It’s crazy how someone on the opposite side of the aisle could replace “transgender” with a group they don’t like, and deliver an identical message.
But again, you are too deep in your cult to see this.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 2:06 pm to JKeller34
quote:Exactly! It’s always best to fight for your rights AFTER they’ve been taken away!
Yet Trump has never taken one persons gun away.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 2:07 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Indeed it is. You used the term “psychopath” previously.
Go back and look at what that specific post was referring to. Then apologize.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 2:07 pm to JKeller34
quote:
And posted in this thread are acting like this is the first infringement. While doing so some are advocating for mentally ill transgenders instead of states who infringe it everyday for less.
is this sort of like the "we've got to kill them or they'll die" argument? we should be ok with this infringement since there are other infringements?
Page 19 of 28
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News