- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Justice Department Considering Pushing to Ban Transgendered People from Owning Firearms
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:47 pm to ThuperThumpin
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:47 pm to ThuperThumpin
the number of conservatives on this thread who have no doubt screamed to high hell about "red flag" laws and the like who are suddenly FOR such laws is a little concerning. that said, the huge number of posters weighing in in support of 2nd amendment absolutism is great.
easily abused subjective criteria should NEVER EVER be used to strip rights from someone.
easily abused subjective criteria should NEVER EVER be used to strip rights from someone.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:47 pm to PrettyLights
quote:
Shall not be infringed means Shall not be infringed.
And it’s already infringed towards law abiding gun owners.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:47 pm to BBONDS25
quote:gave it the attention it deserved.
Why did you ignore the second part of my post?
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:48 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
So you’d bar anyone that has any diagnosis in the DSM? Good luck with that.
Jesus youre dumb. I specifically said aSPD. How the frick did you miss that? And I didn’t say I would ban a thing.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:48 pm to prouddawg
quote:Just tryin to help a brother out
didn’t even think of that angle when I posted
This post was edited on 9/4/25 at 1:49 pm
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:49 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
We don't allow the mentally ill to own firearms.
No, we don’t allow persons that have “been adjudicated as a mental defective” or have “been committed to any mental institution” to own firearms.
If a trans person does not fit either of those two criteria, should they be allowed to possess a firearm?
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:49 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
That’s some damn mobile goalposts
Is that not transgenderism? Was that not the question? What the frick are you talking about?
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:49 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
No, we don’t allow persons that have “been adjudicated as a mental defective” or have “been committed to any mental institution” to own firearms.
even that is a dangerously slippery slope
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:50 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Its phrased that way because it has a specific meaning—as onmymedicalgrind has pointed out.
Correct. Honestly, it’s less about the “mental defect” part and more about the “adjudicated” part.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:50 pm to ThuperThumpin
quote:Trump disagrees. lTake the guns first, due process later”
No...we just dont believe you can strip someone's rights away without some sort of due process.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:51 pm to Sam Quint
quote:
slippery slope
Slicker than owl shite on a door knob.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:51 pm to St Augustine
quote:
in 26 years I’ve voted for a Dem exactly 0 times on any level of government.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:51 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
If a trans person does not fit either of those two criteria, should they be allowed to possess a firearm?
Probably, but I'd say it's pretty obvious you're a mental defective if you can't figure out what gender you are.
That said, there's no way the USA can lose here. Either this goes through and we're all protected from the insanity of trannies with guns, or the Democrats successfully defend gun rights in court. Win/win.
This post was edited on 9/4/25 at 1:52 pm
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:53 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Trump disagrees. lTake the guns first, due process later”
Yet Trump has never taken one persons gun away. This is the same bs as the left saying Trump deported citizens when that’s never happened.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:54 pm to JKeller34
quote:
Yet Trump has never taken one persons gun away. This is the same bs as the left saying Trump deported citizens when that’s never happened.
Well he literally did say to take the guns away and due process later. Plus he had that gay arse bump stock ban.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:55 pm to Sam Quint
quote:Gotta support the team!
the number of conservatives on this thread who have no doubt screamed to high hell about "red flag" laws and the like who are suddenly FOR such laws is a little concerning.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:56 pm to Ingeniero
quote:
Well he literally did say to take the guns away and due process later. Plus he had that gay arse bump stock ban.
So he never has and now you’re moving on to something else. Got it.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:57 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
gave it the attention it deserved.
Shall not be infringed deserves zero attention in this debate?
Posted on 9/4/25 at 1:58 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Probably, but I'd say it's pretty obvious you're a mental defective if you can't figure out what gender you are.
Look up what “adjudicated” means.
quote:
Democrats successfully defend gun rights in court. Win/win.
When your leader Trump is on the other side? I agree that’s a win for American, but a major L for MAGA.
Popular
Back to top



1







