Started By
Message

re: Jury Deliberations For Crazy Murderess Underway

Posted on 8/31/26 at 2:09 pm to
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
39545 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

I'm really surprised it's taking this long.
Not by accident. They are on live TV.
Posted by Wolfwireless
Member since Aug 2024
5638 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

Will be an interesting precedent (if she gets off) that will carry over into all facets of female life.


I think that the behavior by those not part of the trial is going to set some social precedents.

I mean... I personally would not date any of the women supporting this crazy person. Or any of them saying it was the husband's fault. Nor would I employ any of them if I were in the position to do so.
And I'm very curious to see whether any custody cases from divorces are going to come up from this.
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
12128 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

It is ironic that in the same week that the Lindsay Clancy murder trial was wrapping up, the New York Post would run an article about moms being diagnosed with the alleged mental disorder ADHD. And regardless of the outcome, the Clancy trial, if anything, has shined a very bright light on the over-drugging of women as a method of behavioral “treatment,” making the Post’s article completely tone-deaf.

Surprisingly, of all the subjective psychiatric mental disorders Clancy had been diagnosed with, ADHD was not one of them. But like Clancy’s diagnoses of depression, anxiety, bipolar I and II when it comes to ADHD, there just is no objective identifiable abnormality. The fact is there is no blood test, scan, or biomarker that identifies any sort of ADHD brain malfunction that can be targeted for treatment. It is also a fact that all ADHD diagnosing depends on verbal communication about personal history and behavior.


https://joehoft.com/ablechild-adhd-superpower-new-psychiatric-drug-pipeline-target
This post was edited on 8/31/26 at 2:16 pm
Posted by Wolfwireless
Member since Aug 2024
5638 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 2:26 pm to
They said in the video that even if pronounced not guilty, the judge is going to order her institutionalized.
It seems that's a bare minimum of 40 days, under evaluation.
If she or her attorney fail to prove that she's not crazy, or that she hasn't recovered, she is in for at least a year, where she will then come up for review yearly.

I don't see a whole lot of hope in that. The prosecutor making the point that she only "heard the voice" telling her to do this, ONLY at the point of time that she did this.
Her tune about all of this is going to flip, as soon as she's hospitalized.

Her suicide attempt left her paralyzed and in a wheel chair. So she at least brought one consequence upon herself in all of this.
This post was edited on 8/31/26 at 2:42 pm
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
104002 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 2:27 pm to
This is why women shouldn’t be allowed to make any important decisions in anything

They’re way too easily manipulated emotionally
Posted by LSUisSEC
Member since Oct 2011
261 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 2:28 pm to
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
104002 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

Just a few days ago another crazy bitch was acquitted of stabbing and drowning her two little boys due to "post partum psychosis." Hormones are now justification for murder.


Jesus.

One could make the argument that any murder is due to some type of mental illness, hormonal or emotional reaction, or personality disorder. No normal happy person just says “hey I’ll think ill kill someone today, that’ll be fun”
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
41802 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 2:31 pm to
Exactly.
Posted by Wolfwireless
Member since Aug 2024
5638 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

One could make the argument that any murder is due to some type of mental illness, hormonal or emotional reaction, or personality disorder. No normal happy person just says “hey I’ll think ill kill someone today, that’ll be fun”


This really is a dangerous precedent.
What other group is out there unders heavy meds, under mental disorders, and have proven themselves dangerous?
Trannies.
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
56305 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 2:49 pm to
I first predicted last week that it will be a hung jury. It will be up to the State for a re-trial.
Posted by LEOPOLD2
Member since Aug 2026
57 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 2:55 pm to
I was just saying yesterday or the day before on this board that I was surprised it wasn't being discussed because I think it's got massive political implications. Not the actual decision but the mere fact that so many women lost their fricking minds
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
83697 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 3:05 pm to
This woman is pointing out how disastrous this is for women. Even says it makes “repeal the 19th” look like a reasonable argument.


Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted by Ten Bears
Florida
Member since Oct 2018
5252 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

When you call this woman crazy you’re calling all women crazy


So what’s your point?
Posted by roadGator
DeBoar’s dome
Member since Feb 2009
159677 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 3:08 pm to
It’s El Gaucho

There is no point other than to troll.
Posted by Placekicker
Florida
Member since Jan 2016
14448 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 3:08 pm to
[quote]One could make the argument that any murder is due to some type of mental illness, hormonal or emotional reaction, or personality disorder. [\quote]

True. If she gets off, could this be a new legal precedent to give anyone the license to kill under the auspice of mental illness, hormonal imbalance, or emotional reaction?

I mean, a lot of murders are emotional reactions to situations.

Could this be society’s “get out of jail free” card for murder?
Posted by Houag80
Member since Jul 2019
20133 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 3:10 pm to
I could solve this punishment quickly....with a handgun and a walk out back.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
83697 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

Could this be women’s “get out of jail free” card for murder?


FIFY
Posted by jp4lsu
Member since Sep 2016
7281 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 3:13 pm to
So the Yates B!tch that drowned her kids didn't get off for post partum psychosis. Will she get a retrial now?
Why didn't she get the same treatment as Clancy?
Posted by BhamTigah
Lurker since Jan 2003
Member since Jan 2007
17957 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 3:14 pm to
I never really understood the insanity plea as it relates to murder.

If you kill someone, it is either self-defense or you're not mentally right. To kill someone (other than self-defense), especially your own children, requires an element of insanity. That doesn't mean your arse shouldn't fry.
Posted by DrrTiger
Gulf of America
Member since Nov 2023
2666 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

I could solve this punishment quickly....with a handgun and a walk out back.


She's only paralyzed from the waist down. She still has feeling in the upper body. At a bare minimum, let's fix that.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram