- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judicial Watch: 900,000 illegal aliens voted in midterms. New numbers out of TX and PA
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:09 pm to bamarep
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:09 pm to bamarep
quote:
Now how can they gather evidence when the Voter Fraud Commission isn't given access to voter information?
so it's ok to just pull numbers out of the air? sounds like something a liar might do
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:11 pm to 90proofprofessional
quote:are you serious, Clark? Tom and Judical Watch are lawyers. They aren't going to pull numbers out of their arse without evidence. I imagine Tom meant nation wide-so far.
so it's ok to just pull numbers out of the air? sounds like something a liar might do
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:11 pm to 90proofprofessional
Why not?
Doing investigations without proof of a crime seems to be acceptable these days.
Doing investigations without proof of a crime seems to be acceptable these days.
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:15 pm to L.A.
quote:
It is however highly suggestive that irregularities occurred on a massive scale in 2016.
Then why couldn’t the PACEI produce that evidence when it counted in front of a judge?
And no, your anecdote wasn’t “highly suggestive” of anything. It doesn’t mean voter rolls were purged, any more than it means illegals were voting en masse.
You’re using that anecdote as proof to support your previously held belief that polls are being compromised, despite numerous failed attempts to produce substantial supporting evidence when it matters, under judicial review.
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:15 pm to bamarep
quote:
Why not?
If lying isn't a problem for you, I can't really think of another reason. But as far as convincing people who care about facts goes, I like the following quote:
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.” – Christopher Hitchens
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:16 pm to QJenk
quote:
If this stat is true, how does so many illegal individuals cheat the system to be able to register to vote in the first place?
I've explained this before. The illegal voter simply goes into the poll near closing time. The clerk is in on the deal. That's why it only happens in heavily Dem districts that are run by corrupt Dems.
Juan: 'Who hasn't voted yet?'
Clerk: 'Richard Groat.'
Juan: 'That's me.'
Clerk: 'Sign here and go right in.'
This continues until 100% of the registered voters have been signed off as voting.
Since it takes a long time the Dems continually argue for extended voting times.
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:16 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
Tom and Judical Watch are lawyers. They aren't going to pull numbers out of their arse without evidence.
Lawyers are well-known for their honesty and evenhanded dealings. :rofl:
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:17 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
Tom and Judical Watch are lawyers. They aren't going to pull numbers out of their arse without evidence
is their claim exactly what the thread title claims? if so, did they present some good evidence of it? i clicked on op and found nothing better than a video of some waxface dude talking instead of actual evidence
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:17 pm to 90proofprofessional
quote:
so it's ok to just pull numbers out of the air?
'Member that term "Trump colluded with Russia?"
I do.
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:18 pm to 90proofprofessional
quote:Yeah, the Kavanaugh hearings proved that. That was nothing more than a witch hunt once again by the left that blew up in their face, again.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.” – Christopher Hitchens
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:18 pm to cajunangelle
900,000?
The majority responses on this thread prove that PT Barnum was entirely correct.
The Texas AG (a REPUBLICAN) recently released a report indicating that about 50,000 people who "might" not have been citizens voted in an election over a period of about 25 years.
That is a couple of thousand per year ... or about 1/100th of one percent of the people who have voted in Texas.
900,000. (shakes head)
The majority responses on this thread prove that PT Barnum was entirely correct.
The Texas AG (a REPUBLICAN) recently released a report indicating that about 50,000 people who "might" not have been citizens voted in an election over a period of about 25 years.
That is a couple of thousand per year ... or about 1/100th of one percent of the people who have voted in Texas.
900,000. (shakes head)
This post was edited on 3/19/19 at 2:30 pm
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:19 pm to cajunangelle
Add another 0 and you are probably damn close to the actual national number.
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:19 pm to cajunangelle
So what your really saying is Texas with the toughest voter ID laws in America had massive voter fraud? I love how with out one source of confirmed information everyone on this board believes this . Talk about fake news . I think the state of Texas might have something to say with half a million people voting illegally in elections in that state. I tried to google to find any article to back this up but to my surprise i found nothing coming out of the state of Texas. We all know Texas is state full of liberals who will stop at nothing to insure that all illegals have the right to vote.
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:20 pm to hawkeye007
Anonymous sources aren’t adequate anymore?
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:20 pm to victoire sécurisé
quote:Are you a US citizen? If you are, your attitude completely baffles me. When I hear stories like the one I shared my attitude is, hmmm, I want that investigated because I want to ensure that only US citizens are voting in US elections.
Then why couldn’t the PACEI produce that evidence when it counted in front of a judge?
And no, your anecdote wasn’t “highly suggestive” of anything. It doesn’t mean voter rolls were purged, any more than it means illegals were voting en masse.
You’re using that anecdote as proof to support your previously held belief that polls are being compromised, despite numerous failed attempts to produce substantial supporting evidence when it matters, under judicial review.
You? I don't know wtf your angle is or your point is.
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:23 pm to L.A.
quote:Lemmings going to lemming...
You? I don't know wtf your angle is or your point is.
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:25 pm to 90proofprofessional
You say there's not evidence, a simple internet search will prove otherwise.
It's the extent which is unknown, and will always be unknown without a proper investigation.
It's the extent which is unknown, and will always be unknown without a proper investigation.
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:26 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
'Member that term "Trump colluded with Russia?"
if it turns out that that investigation was initiated and green-lighted based on the same process of 100% making up shite out of thin air, it will come to light.
what it sounds like though is that you're ok with that type of process, under certain circumstances.
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:27 pm to bamarep
quote:
ou say there's not evidence, a simple internet search will prove otherwise.
the ol' evergreen copout
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:28 pm to 90proofprofessional
You miss his point. Nobody disputes there are a handful of illegals that voted. No one disputes that. The question is: to what extent.
That differs from trump...where there is still zero evidence of collusion.
You support an investigation on the latter and not the former. Your motivation may not be pure.
That differs from trump...where there is still zero evidence of collusion.
You support an investigation on the latter and not the former. Your motivation may not be pure.
Popular
Back to top



3









