Started By
Message

re: Judicial Watch: 900,000 illegal aliens voted in midterms. New numbers out of TX and PA

Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:09 pm to
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

Now how can they gather evidence when the Voter Fraud Commission isn't given access to voter information?

so it's ok to just pull numbers out of the air? sounds like something a liar might do

Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167605 posts
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

so it's ok to just pull numbers out of the air? sounds like something a liar might do
are you serious, Clark? Tom and Judical Watch are lawyers. They aren't going to pull numbers out of their arse without evidence. I imagine Tom meant nation wide-so far.
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
52562 posts
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:11 pm to
Why not?


Doing investigations without proof of a crime seems to be acceptable these days.
Posted by victoire sécurisé
Member since Nov 2012
5662 posts
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

It is however highly suggestive that irregularities occurred on a massive scale in 2016.


Then why couldn’t the PACEI produce that evidence when it counted in front of a judge?

And no, your anecdote wasn’t “highly suggestive” of anything. It doesn’t mean voter rolls were purged, any more than it means illegals were voting en masse.

You’re using that anecdote as proof to support your previously held belief that polls are being compromised, despite numerous failed attempts to produce substantial supporting evidence when it matters, under judicial review.
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

Why not?

If lying isn't a problem for you, I can't really think of another reason. But as far as convincing people who care about facts goes, I like the following quote:

“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.” – Christopher Hitchens
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
117599 posts
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

If this stat is true, how does so many illegal individuals cheat the system to be able to register to vote in the first place?


I've explained this before. The illegal voter simply goes into the poll near closing time. The clerk is in on the deal. That's why it only happens in heavily Dem districts that are run by corrupt Dems.

Juan: 'Who hasn't voted yet?'
Clerk: 'Richard Groat.'
Juan: 'That's me.'
Clerk: 'Sign here and go right in.'

This continues until 100% of the registered voters have been signed off as voting.

Since it takes a long time the Dems continually argue for extended voting times.
Posted by victoire sécurisé
Member since Nov 2012
5662 posts
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

Tom and Judical Watch are lawyers. They aren't going to pull numbers out of their arse without evidence.


Lawyers are well-known for their honesty and evenhanded dealings. :rofl:
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

Tom and Judical Watch are lawyers. They aren't going to pull numbers out of their arse without evidence

is their claim exactly what the thread title claims? if so, did they present some good evidence of it? i clicked on op and found nothing better than a video of some waxface dude talking instead of actual evidence
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
97057 posts
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

so it's ok to just pull numbers out of the air?


'Member that term "Trump colluded with Russia?"

I do.
Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
21240 posts
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.” – Christopher Hitchens
Yeah, the Kavanaugh hearings proved that. That was nothing more than a witch hunt once again by the left that blew up in their face, again.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:18 pm to
900,000?

The majority responses on this thread prove that PT Barnum was entirely correct.

The Texas AG (a REPUBLICAN) recently released a report indicating that about 50,000 people who "might" not have been citizens voted in an election over a period of about 25 years.

That is a couple of thousand per year ... or about 1/100th of one percent of the people who have voted in Texas.

900,000. (shakes head)
This post was edited on 3/19/19 at 2:30 pm
Posted by timdonaghyswhistle
Member since Jul 2018
21070 posts
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:19 pm to
Add another 0 and you are probably damn close to the actual national number.
Posted by hawkeye007
Member since Feb 2010
6297 posts
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:19 pm to
So what your really saying is Texas with the toughest voter ID laws in America had massive voter fraud? I love how with out one source of confirmed information everyone on this board believes this . Talk about fake news . I think the state of Texas might have something to say with half a million people voting illegally in elections in that state. I tried to google to find any article to back this up but to my surprise i found nothing coming out of the state of Texas. We all know Texas is state full of liberals who will stop at nothing to insure that all illegals have the right to vote.

Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59474 posts
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:20 pm to
Anonymous sources aren’t adequate anymore?
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
66703 posts
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

Then why couldn’t the PACEI produce that evidence when it counted in front of a judge?

And no, your anecdote wasn’t “highly suggestive” of anything. It doesn’t mean voter rolls were purged, any more than it means illegals were voting en masse.

You’re using that anecdote as proof to support your previously held belief that polls are being compromised, despite numerous failed attempts to produce substantial supporting evidence when it matters, under judicial review.
Are you a US citizen? If you are, your attitude completely baffles me. When I hear stories like the one I shared my attitude is, hmmm, I want that investigated because I want to ensure that only US citizens are voting in US elections.

You? I don't know wtf your angle is or your point is.

Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
21240 posts
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

You? I don't know wtf your angle is or your point is.
Lemmings going to lemming...
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
52562 posts
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:25 pm to
You say there's not evidence, a simple internet search will prove otherwise.


It's the extent which is unknown, and will always be unknown without a proper investigation.
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

'Member that term "Trump colluded with Russia?"

if it turns out that that investigation was initiated and green-lighted based on the same process of 100% making up shite out of thin air, it will come to light.

what it sounds like though is that you're ok with that type of process, under certain circumstances.
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

ou say there's not evidence, a simple internet search will prove otherwise.


the ol' evergreen copout
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59474 posts
Posted on 3/19/19 at 2:28 pm to
You miss his point. Nobody disputes there are a handful of illegals that voted. No one disputes that. The question is: to what extent.

That differs from trump...where there is still zero evidence of collusion.

You support an investigation on the latter and not the former. Your motivation may not be pure.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram