- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Judges strike down Trump administration student loan forgiveness overhaul
Posted on 7/1/26 at 1:26 pm
Posted on 7/1/26 at 1:26 pm
quote:
Two federal judges on Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from implementing new restrictions on a student loan forgiveness program that would have barred public service workers from receiving debt relief if their employers are deemed to have a “substantial illegal purpose.”
The rulings, issued by Biden-appointed judges in Massachusetts and Washington, D.C., came just one day before the new eligibility rules were set to take effect.
The Trump administration had sought to add new rules to the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program as part of its targeted overhaul of government programs that do not align with the administration’s priorities.
quote:
In Massachusetts, U.S. District Judge Myong Joun struck down the changes, finding the agency lacked legal authority and could potentially violate the First Amendment, as well as threaten to force the administration’s viewpoints on employers.
“The Department cannot create new criminal prohibitions through rulemaking,” Joun wrote in his opinion, adding: “Indeed, the record further demonstrates ?that the ?Final Rule has already chilled protected speech.”
quote:LINK
U.S. District Judge Amir Ali in Washington, D.C., separately struck down the rule in a case brought on by four nonprofits that advocate for immigration rights, among other issues.
Under Secretary of Education Nicholas Kent said the agency is evaluating next steps for its “commonsense policy.”
“The Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program is intended to support Americans who serve the public good, not to subsidize organizations that engage in terrorism, facilitate illegal immigration, or support the mutilation of children,” he said in a statement.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 1:29 pm to Jbird
When will the Supreme Court step in and stop this madness ?
The skunk democrats did this on purpose to object everything Trump does.
Such bullshite
The skunk democrats did this on purpose to object everything Trump does.
Such bullshite
Posted on 7/1/26 at 1:30 pm to Jbird
Do (R)'s have ANY federal judges?
Posted on 7/1/26 at 1:31 pm to Jbird
U.S. District Judge Myong Joun and U.S. District Judge Amir Ali
Posted on 7/1/26 at 1:32 pm to RummelTiger
quote:
Do (R)'s have ANY federal judges?
Certainly makes one wonder a lot of times.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 1:34 pm to Jbird
I would be issuing 50 EO's a day to fight this lawfare. EOfare vs lawfare might get the public to take notice, finally, of what the MSM (Lying Media) will not tell them.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 1:34 pm to RummelTiger
quote:
Do (R)'s have ANY federal judges?
Trump appointed a lot in his first term. So yes.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 1:37 pm to Jbird
The planned onslaught continues. Trump is being blocked at every turn. They are desperately trying to run out the clock on him.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 1:39 pm to Powerman
quote:
Trump appointed a lot in his first term. So yes.
It was said in jest, P-dog.
Just seems like every time something makes sense, a (D) fed judge comes along and takes a dump all over it.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 1:40 pm to Placekicker
quote:
Trump is being blocked at every turn.
Then he should hire better lawyers. Trumps EOs are written poorly with little legal research. They are expressions of what 'should be' in the admin's eyes without any actual legal strategy on how to get there.
Happened to the muslim ban, tariffs, birthright. He keeps getting shot in the foot by his own shitty lawyers.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 1:41 pm to atlgamecockman
quote:
Then he should hire better lawyers. Trumps EOs are written poorly with little legal research. They are expressions of what 'should be' in the admin's eyes without any actual legal strategy on how to get there.
Happened to the muslim ban, tariffs, birthright. He keeps getting shot in the foot by his own shitty lawyers.
Yeah...that's the reason.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 1:43 pm to Jbird
Amir Ali and Myong Juon? That’s the Democrat Party in a nutshell
Posted on 7/1/26 at 1:47 pm to RummelTiger
Yeah it's that the judges are nakedly partisan
Look, if you bring a suit, judges are going to rule on the merits/facts. If something contravenes the law, even if it's something that 'should be', we're still a nation of laws.
Congress should be doing something, anything and they're not. That's the problem. That and ideologues running the show at the white house who don't have any strategy of how to implement changes rather than just preaching about how things ought to be and making declarative EOs that contravene the existing law.
Look, if you bring a suit, judges are going to rule on the merits/facts. If something contravenes the law, even if it's something that 'should be', we're still a nation of laws.
Congress should be doing something, anything and they're not. That's the problem. That and ideologues running the show at the white house who don't have any strategy of how to implement changes rather than just preaching about how things ought to be and making declarative EOs that contravene the existing law.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 1:49 pm to atlgamecockman
The supreme Court has slapped the Boasberg class already.
Posted on 7/1/26 at 1:50 pm to atlgamecockman
It must be swell living in a World where judges aren’t partisan lol on a scale of 1-10, how stupid are you?
Posted on 7/1/26 at 1:53 pm to atlgamecockman
quote:
judges are going to rule on the merits/facts.
This one has already been proven false, see Boasberg, James
Posted on 7/1/26 at 1:58 pm to atlgamecockman
quote:
Yeah it's that the judges are nakedly partisan
At least we agree.
Popular
Back to top
8












