- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judges are trying to become president.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:30 am to eddieray
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:30 am to eddieray
quote:
More scapegoating from Trump. No one wants him going unchecked, not even the people that think they do.
nobody said they wanted him to go unchecked dumbass
this isnt checking though. the president absolutely has the powers to do what he has been doing under the executive branch and the powers appointed to them
he campaigned on deporting criminals and anyone here illegally. this is exactly what we voted for dumbass
1
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:30 am to Lg
quote:
Trump just cut through the GOVERNMENT red tape that everybody complains about and did what was inevitably going to happen anyway.
Trump cut through government red tape by using laws already on the books.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:30 am to Boss
That's pretty much the guy at Columbia.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:31 am to Flats
quote:
But time-wise the power they wield is extremely asymmetric.
If you're talking about injunctions, that is due to Congressional authorization, and can be scaled back by Congress. The reason this is not likely to happen is everyone wants this avenue when they're not in power (as we saw during the Biden admin).
quote:
It's like saying the guy wrongly jailed for a year turns out fine because he won his appeal. They can do political damage regardless of whether they're eventually overturned.
Congress/POTUS, not the courts, are the bodies who makes the judgment call here weighing the costs/benefits
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:31 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
I don't love unchecked executive power.
I don't either, but I also don't love unchecked judicial power.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:31 am to GumboPot
quote:
Trump cut through government red tape by using laws already on the books
But SFPs just defending the constituion for criminals like Boasberg
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:31 am to eddieray
interesting take. so you would have zero issues with Trump and his majority congress impeaching all dem appointed DC judges and replacing them with lackeys who will simply "undo" anything the Republican party doesnt like from future democrat presidents?
Answer honestly.
Answer honestly.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If you're talking about injunctions, that is due to Congressional authorization,
That doesn't make my statement any less true.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:32 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
What is wrong with a hearing or whatever on whether Trump followed this law?
That is what the histrionics ignore.
Nobody is sympathizing or defending TDA. They're just saying TDA should get a hearing prior to being deported to Venezuela.
Why is that such an emotionally-charged option for the MAGA contingent?
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:33 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
They're just saying TDA should get a hearing prior to being deported to Venezuela.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:33 am to SDVTiger
quote:
But SFPs just defending the constituion for criminals like Boasberg
Yes, when that "tape cutting" is skipping over rights. Then it's a Constitutional issue.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:33 am to lsu777
quote:
nobody said they wanted him to go unchecked dumbass
this isnt checking though. the president absolutely has the powers to do what he has been doing under the executive branch and the powers appointed to them
The game is to slow Trump down. They know he is acting legally. But if they can get him tied up in judicial review that means the less deportations Trump can make before the midterms. Dems need these illegals here to vote in precincts where they don't check ID.
It's a game.
This post was edited on 3/19/25 at 8:40 am
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:35 am to GumboPot
quote:
They know he is acting legally. But if they can get him tied up in judicial review that means the less deportations
This process to deport these TDA guys would have only been slightly delayed had he just done it traditionally.
His legal argument is also flimsy and may result in the deportations being reversed, which is not a good option, either.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:35 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Then it's a Constitutional issue
Sorry illegal criminal gang members dont fall under that despite what you lefties say
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:36 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Sorry illegal criminal gang members dont fall under that despite what you lefties say
Now you're just making shite up and lying
But it's a good segue to ask this again (Since nobody answered)
quote:
I'll ask it here, though. If we have no judicial oversight/recourse, what happens when a citizen is labeled a "terrorist" and then put on a plane in the middle of the night and shipped off to a Central American jail? Do they just have to grin and bear it?
This example is why protecting the rights of pieces of shite is important, and why most cases involving Constitutional rights in this realm involve unsavory, sometimes evil, people.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:37 am to SDVTiger
quote:I sometimes wonder when the Reactionary Right decided that Textualism constitutes "Leftism."quote:Sorry illegal criminal gang members dont fall under that despite what you lefties say
Then it's a Constitutional issue
It is a strange reversal.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:37 am to GumboPot
quote:
But if they can get him tied up in judicial review
I don't think I've ever seen a lawyer admit that this happens by design.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:38 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I sometimes wonder when the Reactionary Right decided that Textualism constitutes "Leftism."
It is a strange reversal.
He's just being inflammatory under the guise of being irrational.
He's one of the few who admits he has few, if any beliefs aligned with conservatism like limited government or decreased spending. He's one of the honest ones, in other words.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:38 am to GumboPot
quote:
The game is to slow Trump down. They know he is acting legally. But if they can get him tied up in judicial review that means the less deportations Trump can make before the midterms. Dems need these illegals here to vote in precincts were they don't check ID.
It's a game.
100% i just cant stand dudes like that when they try and misrepresent what the trump voters like
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:38 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Now you're just making shite up and lying
Lol this is like when you tried to argue that illegal criminals have the right to bear arms
Page 5 of 13
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News