- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge ruled that migrants flown to Martha’s Vineyard can sue charter flight company
Posted on 4/2/24 at 4:40 pm to dgnx6
Posted on 4/2/24 at 4:40 pm to dgnx6
quote:
told you this would backfire.
There's no backfire. Sanctuaries, activist organizations and judges have been exposed. This is going to get worse for them. The end result is that they're going to try and force the invaders to stay in places like Florida and Florida is then going to completely deny them benefits, medical care, entry into schools etc. The federal government has no power to force states to face this burden or shoulder the harmful effects of an invasion that the federal government has set upon the states - they have effectively declared war on our nation. This is a guaranteed L for the federal government.
0
Posted on 4/2/24 at 5:07 pm to chili pup
quote:
I'm asked why I sent them there, I am saying "because I want to make sure they are living better and taken care of". Martha's Vineyard is such a lovely and caring place
Sanctuary city status.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 5:44 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Yeah, that didn't make sense to me. I've been wondering how Ron is dodging some type of kidnapping charges or false imprisonment claims. I'm guessing the illegals are signing a waiver?
As others have mentioned, DeSantis won his motion to dismiss. Just about all the other plaintiffs, including Montgomerie and Perla Huerta won their motion to dismiss. Vertol ( the charter company) won their motion on dismissing three counts, but still must face the lawsuit on the other counts. Full decision hosted on LCR
DeSantis has a number of potential protections available. If the other alleged conspirators would face legal jeopardy, it would probably be in Texas as that is where most of their conduct took place.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 6:05 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
The one where a state or municipality declares themselves to be a SANCTUARY for illegal immigrants
Don't think this won't be hammered at the trial.
Also, I suspect this judge has some MV connections for which he should have recused.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 6:17 pm to udtiger
If I am a private company hired to transport passengers- they must prove actual knowledge that the actions I took were with full knowledge of the misrepresentations made to the people suing.
How would I know what transpired.
This case ends with a whimper
How would I know what transpired.
This case ends with a whimper
Posted on 4/2/24 at 6:25 pm to loogaroo
quote:
The court also said that “Unlike ICE agents legitimately enforcing the country’s immigration laws ... the Court sees no legitimate purpose for rounding up highly vulnerable individuals on false pretenses and publicly injecting them into a divisive national debate.”
The question should be, which state should be burdened with unwanted illegal immigrants. Why would Martha's Vineyard be exempt and Florida be responsible?????
And how can people who are not American citizens be afforded the right to our court system?????
Looking forward to how this plays out
Posted on 4/2/24 at 6:28 pm to lake chuck fan
Martha's Vineyard is still a sanctuary city. Send them more. Lawfare be damned.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 6:33 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
The question should be, which state should be burdened with unwanted illegal immigrants. Why would Martha's Vineyard be exempt and Florida be responsible? And how can people who are not American citizens be afforded the right to our court system?????
Looking forward to how this plays out
Biden can fly these frickers across our international border and into whichever state he wants to burden, but states can't ship them across state lines? You're right, this will be interesting.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 6:57 pm to dafif
Seems like the court has already determined the facts
quote:
the Court sees no legitimate purpose for rounding up highly vulnerable individuals on false pretenses a
Posted on 4/2/24 at 7:07 pm to David_DJS
Migrants dodged a bullet by not getting that chef job at Obamas.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 7:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I think the claims are based in people alleging they were promised jobs and shelter at the new location.
Did MV not claim that they were a sanctuary place for said illegals? Did they not openly advertise it? Sounds like they need to be named in the suit correct.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 7:15 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
They’re not “Florida cases”. Landing in Mass. creates “minimum contacts” for purposes of International Shoe case.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 7:25 pm to VOR
quote:
VOR
Martha's Vineyard is a sanctuary city. Why did they call the military on the illegal aliens that landed there?
Posted on 4/3/24 at 7:27 am to Rebel
Posted on 4/3/24 at 7:29 am to Strannix
quote:
Did MV not claim that they were a sanctuary place for said illegals?
"Martha's Vineyard" was not a party to the transactions/conversations in Texas or Florida.
This is a dumb take.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News