- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Judge Disregards SCOTUS, After Ruling DOGE Takeover of Institute of Peace is Illegal
Posted on 5/24/25 at 4:06 pm
Posted on 5/24/25 at 4:06 pm
Now these Marxist in black robes are refusing to follow SCOTUS rulings.
This is a ploy by the Marxist to push Trump to also not respect SCOTUS rulings, then they will propagandize the hell out of it. These folks have zero concern for this nation nor the integrity of its government.
LINK
This is a ploy by the Marxist to push Trump to also not respect SCOTUS rulings, then they will propagandize the hell out of it. These folks have zero concern for this nation nor the integrity of its government.
quote:
However, Howell, an Obama appointee, said the Supreme Court’s ruling on NLRB and MSPB firings are not relevant to this case because USIP “does not exercise executive power and thus is not part of the Executive branch.”
“[T]he President does not have absolute constitutional removal authority over USIP Board members but must comply with the statute in exercising his removal power,” Howell wrote in her 7-page ruling
LINK
9
Posted on 5/24/25 at 4:08 pm to lake chuck fan
“Lower court judges have the right to ignore SCOTUS. That’s part of our system of checks and balances.” - Slow Fani Pro
Posted on 5/24/25 at 4:08 pm to lake chuck fan
More made up bullshite from the second worst profession in America after pawn shop owners - lawyers.
Posted on 5/24/25 at 4:10 pm to thebigmuffaletta
That judge:
Posted on 5/24/25 at 4:11 pm to lake chuck fan
So, a lower court can ignore the highest court. But if Trump follows the highest court and ignores a lower court he's a tyrant.
Am I doing it right?
Am I doing it right?
Posted on 5/24/25 at 4:15 pm to KCT
quote:
So, a lower court can ignore the highest court. But if Trump follows the highest court and ignores a lower court he's a tyrant.
Am I doing it right?
It appears that your perception is correct!
I repeat my belief that this is the Marxist strategy, continually attempt to provoke Trump’s admin to respond in like and let their MSM propaganda machine to blast it.
Posted on 5/24/25 at 4:17 pm to KCT
It will be appealed and trump will win. Trump brought an army of lawyers with him. I'm assuming he kept them to handle all of the lawfare.
Posted on 5/24/25 at 4:17 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
USIP
Yet another one that Congress could nip in the bud by passing legislation that would effectively kill it.
Posted on 5/24/25 at 4:18 pm to LegendInMyMind
We don’t need laws for everything.
We just need to hang Marxist judges by their fingernails. Metaphorically of course.
We just need to hang Marxist judges by their fingernails. Metaphorically of course.
Posted on 5/24/25 at 4:18 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
“does not exercise executive power and thus is not part of the Executive branch.”
So, the USIP, unlike the other two is not part of the Executive Branch, then which branch is it a part of?
Are they still getting funded at the same level in the Big Beautiful Bill?
Posted on 5/24/25 at 4:29 pm to the808bass
quote:
We don’t need laws for everything.
Considering USIP was established by Congressional legislation, is funded by Congressional appropriation, and is managed by Senate approval......you kind of do.
Add USIP to the pile with the DoE. If breath is left in either of their corpses when Trump leaves office his efforts to dismantle them will have been a complete failure. If either is left alive, as in not fully killed by Congress, they will be resurrected.
This post was edited on 5/24/25 at 4:30 pm
Posted on 5/24/25 at 4:30 pm to LegendInMyMind
Anyone who, with a straight face, tells me that laws will fix our judicial fiasco is a fricking retard.
Posted on 5/24/25 at 4:31 pm to the808bass
quote:
We don’t need laws for everything.
We just need to hang Marxist judges by their fingernails. Metaphorically of course.
Remember how our forefathers dealt with these type of folks?? It involved tar and feathers.
Posted on 5/24/25 at 4:33 pm to the808bass
quote:
Anyone who, with a straight face, tells me that laws will fix our judicial fiasco is a fricking retard.
You're cute in saying that. The fact remains, Trump and the Republican Congress has/have the opportunity to fulfill a major part of his agenda in a real way, not a limited Executive Order way. If they can't do it, it will be a failure.
This post was edited on 5/24/25 at 4:36 pm
Posted on 5/24/25 at 4:33 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
“Lower court judges have the right to ignore SCOTUS. That’s part of our system of checks and balances.” - Slow Fani Pro
Glad to see your reliance on lying is still strong.
Posted on 5/24/25 at 4:47 pm to the808bass
I had a thread on this the other day. Her quote that this thing is sort of public, but sort of private, was pretty ridiculous.
Posted on 5/24/25 at 4:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:“Lower court judges have the right to ignore SCOTUS. That’s part of our system of checks and balances.” - Slow Fani Pro Glad to see your reliance on lying is still strong.
What is your opinion of this ruling?
Posted on 5/24/25 at 4:49 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
You're cute in saying that. The fact remains, Trump and the Republican Congress has the opportunity to fulfill a major part of his agenda in a real way, not a limited Executive Order way. If they can't do it, it will be a failure.
They don't want solutions. They've been told and primed to be angry and this is one of their outlets.
Posted on 5/24/25 at 4:50 pm to Warboo
quote:
What is your opinion of this ruling?
I'd have to read the full USSC opinion, both sides of the briefing, and the order to guess, without appellate review over this district court ruling.
I'm not familiar with litigation over this specific issue with this specific agency like I am other issues that have come before the court (14A, AEA, WKA, etc.) where I can comment more off the cuff.
Posted on 5/24/25 at 4:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
They don't want solutions. They've been told and primed to be angry and this is one of their outlets.
frick your incessant martyr horse shite.
You just got asked what your opinion is of this fricking ruling.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News