re: Judge blocks Trump’s Postal Service regulation on mail-in ballots

And don't forget the friggin senate has to approve these frickin turds

quote:

---

Nasty miserable b*tch blocks Trump’s Postal Service regulation on mail-in ballots

---

quote:

---

I corrected your title

---

quote:

---

Judge blocks Trump’s Postal Service regulation on mail-in ballots

---

This was inevitable. Talwani was the original Judge involved in the injunction. But as the Postal Service had not yet published its actual rules implementing the order, SCOTUS said she'd acted too soon. Once the rules were published, it was an automatic trigger for re-issuance of the injunction.

Dems will lock this thing up in court long enough so that implementation problems will come into the mix. The courts will then rule that there is not "enough time" for implementation. The game is to run out the clock on the 2026 election. At 70 days out from the election, this should be pretty easy work for the Democrats to stave off.

She did it again or is this a different version from the other day?

quote:

---

The issue is at the core of leftist manipulation of elections as the blue states refuse to comply with DHS and Social Security cross-checks for voter eligibility prior to sending out mail-in ballots.

The blue states do not want their voter rolls cross-checked to verify citizenship status and voter eligibility. We can only guess the number of illegal aliens on the voter rolls.

---

SCOTUS already ruled on this. The dems are trying to run out the clock and say there isn't time before midterms. Alls states have to do is submit from their SOS a list of the mail in ballots.

Why are the democrats afraid of basic transparency? This goes no where but they are trying to run out the clock.

NOW

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

. LAWFARE: Federal Judge Again Blocks USPS Mail Ballot Requirement

She went to Radcliffe. That in itself should disqualifying for a federal judgeship.