re: Judge Blocks Federal Firings during government shut down

Sounds like you need to read the last two weeks of PT to get caught up dude. You keep asking for repeat info that has been hashed out for a week. Or maybe you’re the new contrarian alter.

Well, if it isn’t “well sourced” why come on here and ask about something? Maybe do some research instead of playing gotcha with everyone

frick that. Trump needs to continue on his path and not wait on the courts.
Put the pressure on the other side, eventually if SCOTUS rules against him, let em sort it out later. The elected office of the president is the only elected official that all legally registered voters have the opportunity to vote for. Trump won the electoral and popular vote. Trump speaks for the majority of the people.

quote:

---

Presidential Authority to Eliminate Federal Jobs:Executive Branch Management:The president has plenary authority to organize and manage the executive branch, including restructuring agencies, reallocating resources, or reducing staff, as long as these actions align with existing laws and congressional appropriations.
This stems from the president’s role to "faithfully execute" the laws (Article II, Section 3), which includes overseeing federal agencies and their workforce.

Mechanisms for Eliminating Jobs:Executive Orders: The president can issue executive orders to streamline agencies, merge functions, or reduce staffing levels. For example, an order could mandate a hiring freeze or direct agencies to identify "unnecessary" positions.
Reorganization Plans: The president can propose reorganizing federal agencies to eliminate redundant roles, though significant reorganizations may require congressional approval under certain statutes.
Budgetary Influence: The president can propose budgets that reduce funding for specific agencies or programs, effectively forcing workforce reductions. However, Congress holds the power of the purse and must approve budgets.
Reduction in Force (RIF): The president can direct agencies to implement RIFs, following procedures set by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), to eliminate positions deemed unnecessary

---

+4,000 government workers have been terminated so far, what the hell does this judge think she can do? Give them their jobs back? Cut payroll checks to keep paying them? WTH?

According to Dr. Turkey, they can lay off all the non-essentials, then if the judiciary interferes and wins, different people can be hired, because it’s only the positions that have to be reinstated.

I don’t know if it’s true but if I need to “cite” something, then the ignorant can go listen to his podcast.

quote:

---

Let me ask you something - Did you give a flying frick about any federal civil servant before this administration’s toxic & false rhetoric about them?

---

My wife is a FCS. So yes I do give a flying frick before and after the obiden admins toxic and false rhetoric.

quote:

---

Probably not I would guess. What have they done to you? As another poster said, it’s pretty pathetic that you would celebrate someone losing their livelihood. They didn’t ask for this.

---

You guessed wrong. They have done nothing….i mean literally…most of them do nothing. [

quote]WH. We are not partisan.[/quote]

Ok chief lol. Some are not. Most are.

What's sad is that the government workers are sitting at home unable to work and not getting paid because the radical left is demanding that the Dims stand up to Trump and use the CR as a means to resist him.

I wish Trump would not give them any wiggle room...he keeps shouting out the stage directions during the play. Let the OMB cut the programs and then let them try and make it out to be political. Trump starts off by telling the Dems that he is going to fire Gov. workers who work in programs they like. This is going to make it harder for him to win in court.

can we get a link to the actual order from the Judge?

The President should have a a fast track to SCOTUS to stop these rogue leftie judges from halting progress that was voted for.

We need a ruling from SCOTUS on the narrow issue of whether district court rulings apply outside of their districts. I went to law school. I practice in Federal court often. When I go into the EDLA with a citation from another district or circuit, I do so for persuasive purposes only. I never expect to judge to look at it as binding.

E.g. I do not understand how a judge in shithole Portland can have any authority over anything tyat happens in Texas.