Started By
Message

re: John Kasich's GOP in Ohio rejects him! LMAO!

Posted on 12/28/18 at 10:48 am to
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 10:48 am to
quote:

I picture you


What's your position on tandem kayaks?
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55615 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Doesn't make sense - I shoot a guy because he was about to kill me - and I am supposed to prove he intended to kill me??

My defense is self-defense - If you think I killed him for any other reason then prove it.


Well ole JohnnyU wants you to be guilty of MURDER unless you can PROVE that it was not. Guilty until proven innocent.

Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167305 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 10:50 am to
So where in Ohio are you from? If you can't name a roundabout city/near the town then I call BS.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 10:50 am to
I'm a sucker for a good callout thread.

Keep the fans happy and what not.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
98000 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 10:50 am to
quote:

Kasich 2020


"I never said this" - displacedcuckey
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
89022 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 10:50 am to
quote:

Kasich lacks any self awareness if he thinks he will have any sort of mass support if he runs for President in 2020.


The political scene in this country is literally overrun with people lacking in self-awareness. See She Guevara as a prime example.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167305 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 10:51 am to
pink kayaks, fuschia scooters, we see how ya roll.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103968 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 10:51 am to
The Mailman’s son always fails to deliver.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167305 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 10:51 am to
quote:

Kasich 2020



"I never said this" - displacedcuckey
yet he owns it today.
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
77894 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 10:53 am to
He's such a nice guy
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 10:53 am to
It's been two years and you still don't know why you were wrong about that? Really?
Posted by thebigmuffaletta
Member since Aug 2017
15711 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 10:53 am to
One of the rare times I disagree with you.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 10:54 am to
quote:

So where in Ohio are you from?


Nice try, creeper.
Posted by ILeaveAtHalftime
Member since Sep 2013
2889 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 10:56 am to
quote:

My defense is self-defense - If you think I killed him for any other reason then prove it.


Traditionally in most if not all states you would still have to prove your affirmative defense, as the other poster pointed out. The prosecutor has the burden of proving that you killed the guy beyond a reasonable doubt, not proving your motive for doing so. Self-defense is an affirmative defense, the person asserting an affirmative defense has the burden of proving it. That's standard across both civil and criminal law.

This law seems awkward in that the prosecutors now have to prove a negative. aka "You didn't kill him in self defense", once the defendant pleads not guilty. Do they have to do that in every case or only ones where defendants plead self defense? Does this lead to a situation where prosecutors are going to have to prove other negatives as well i.e. you aren't mentally ill, etc. etc. These defenses have always been borne by those who plead them, proving a negative beyond a reasonable doubt is almost impossible in many circumstances

I'm not fundamentally opposed to such a change, it just seems odd and it is unusual for prosecutors to have to do that. Perhaps the way the actual law is written makes it more intuitive.

ETA: It is nice to watch Kasich get overridden though
This post was edited on 12/28/18 at 11:01 am
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
77894 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 10:57 am to
quote:

So where in Ohio are you from?


Columbus would be a solid guess.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138872 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 11:00 am to
quote:

That must be a horrible feeling. To have veto power just to get vetoed.
Not as hard as a homeowner being burdened with $100K in attorney fees because he shot an intruder in his home, while an overzealous prosecutor forces him to PROVE the perp was shot in self-defense.
Posted by ILeaveAtHalftime
Member since Sep 2013
2889 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 11:02 am to
quote:

Not as hard as a homeowner being burdened with $100K in attorney fees because he shot an intruder in his home, while an overzealous prosecutor forces him to PROVE the perp was shot in self-defense.


His legal fees aren't going to change, there will still be a trial.

Also, how will this be limited to self defense? Why not force the prosecutors to positively rule out all affirmative defenses if this is the rationale?
This post was edited on 12/28/18 at 11:04 am
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167305 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 11:03 am to
quote:

Not as hard as a homeowner being burdened with $100K in attorney fees because he shot an intruder in his home, while an overzealous prosecutor forces him to PROVE the perp was shot in self-defense.
Posted by biggsc
Member since Mar 2009
34777 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 11:03 am to
John and Jeb are weak
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167305 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 11:07 am to
Yeah some proggie dem town with cucks that says THEE OHIO STATE.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram