- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: John Cleese: “I Prefer Cultures That Don’t Tolerate Female Genital Mutilation”
Posted on 5/31/19 at 8:49 am to Centinel
Posted on 5/31/19 at 8:49 am to Centinel
quote:
Male circumcision is in no way, shape, or form comparable to female genital mutilation.
One is done for hygienic reasons, the other is done to remove the ability for a female to receive pleasure from sex to keep them "pure".
One is done because they are afraid you can't wash your dick off in a shower? Impressive.
2
Posted on 5/31/19 at 8:50 am to zatetic
Agree or disagree. I don't really care. But to compare the two is utter bullshite.
Posted on 5/31/19 at 8:51 am to NC_Tigah
John Cleese better high-tail it out of the country. Scotland Yard will have a warrant out for him by the end of the day.
Posted on 5/31/19 at 8:59 am to Centinel
quote:
But to compare the two is utter bullshite.
Disagree. It is complete nonsense to do either one. Hygiene excuse is bullshite. Do you think people are retarded enough to be able to clean the rest of their body but not their dick? Practical brain dead level of thought. They should just tell you they cut the clit off for hygiene because apparently you would believe that.
Posted on 5/31/19 at 9:00 am to zatetic
quote:
It is complete nonsense to do either one.
That may be true. But only one is done to permanently remove the ability to feel sexual pleasure.
quote:
They should just tell you they cut the clit off for hygiene because apparently you would believe that.
Oh, I see. You're just a fricking idiot.
Posted on 5/31/19 at 9:01 am to NC_Tigah
Some cultures are better than others. Know what I mean nudge nudge!
Posted on 5/31/19 at 9:02 am to zatetic
Sorry you have a funny looking pecker that girls find ugly.
Posted on 5/31/19 at 9:06 am to NC_Tigah
Posted on 5/31/19 at 9:09 am to zatetic
quote:
zatetic
Posted on 5/31/19 at 9:16 am to Centinel
quote:
But only one is done to permanently remove the ability to feel sexual pleasure.
Do you honestly not think there is any ramifications for cutting part of your dick off in sexual pleasure. This isn't even going into the trauma inflicted on a baby with forced circumcision. I get it is done for religious purpose and if you are a follower of that then that is fine. But you don't cut off part of your body for hygiene in the possible case you wind up with something later. That's like those gals that cut off their boobs because they may get cancer at some point. If you aren't doing it for religion in the past it was used to mark you a slave.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-47292307
"Through its absence I can certainly verify it is the most erogenously sensitive area of the penis and male body overall," he wrote.
He felt male circumcision should be known as "male genital mutilation" - a view shared by a growing anti-circumcision movement.
"If someone were to amputate your clitoris you may begin to be able to understand how this feels."
"Where I once had a sexual organ I have now been left with a numb, botched stick," he wrote. "My sexuality has been left in tatters."
He estimated he had been stripped of 75% of the sensitivity of his penis.
Posted on 5/31/19 at 9:18 am to zatetic
Caaaaaaaaptaaaaain Ouuuuuuuutlier!
Millions of males in this country are circumcised with zero impact to their ability to feel sexual pleasure.
Every single female who has their clitoris removed can no longer feel sexual pleasure. Forever.
Your comparison is bullshite. Period.
Millions of males in this country are circumcised with zero impact to their ability to feel sexual pleasure.
Every single female who has their clitoris removed can no longer feel sexual pleasure. Forever.
Your comparison is bullshite. Period.
Posted on 5/31/19 at 9:19 am to zatetic
quote:
zatetic
So are you saying all of this because you are not cut?
Posted on 5/31/19 at 9:20 am to TigerBait1971
I'm sure no one here chose to be circumcised. So I'm not casting stones at anyone for what was done to them. And I get it, people would be really defensive about something they have no control over. It is like making fun of someone for things outside of their control... there is no reason to do that...
Posted on 5/31/19 at 9:21 am to zatetic
quote:
That's like those gals that cut off their boobs because they may get cancer at some point.
Wow, you are a stupid bastard. They do it pre-emptively if they've undergone testing and have been found with the hereditary trait that causes breast cancer.
After that statement, you can be ignored as a reactionary who doesn't really know anything.
Posted on 5/31/19 at 9:22 am to zatetic
quote:
I'm sure no one here chose to be circumcised. So I'm not casting stones at anyone for what was done to them. And I get it, people would be really defensive about something they have no control over. It is like making fun of someone for things outside of their control... there is no reason to do that...
You'll be hard pressed to find a male who has been circumcised as a baby, regret that decision.
Sorry you weren't.
This post was edited on 5/31/19 at 9:25 am
Posted on 5/31/19 at 9:23 am to NC_Tigah
I prefer cultures who do not practice ANY genital mutilation...Here's staring you trannies down!
Posted on 5/31/19 at 9:24 am to Centinel
quote:
Every single female who has their clitoris removed can no longer feel sexual pleasure. Forever.
Listen, I'm not arguing that female mutilation is good. I'm saying they are both very bad. If you want to say female is worse that is perfectly fine. I get the outlier comment, as most are done when they are a baby so can't comprehend what you never had. If you were always blind you can't comprehend sight fully. But if you became blind later in life you would know what you lost.
Posted on 5/31/19 at 9:26 am to zatetic
quote:
I'm saying they are both very bad.
They are both not "very bad". Again, millions of males in this country are circumcised with zero negative impact of any kind.
Only one is very bad with permanent physical damage, which is why equating the two is asinine.
Posted on 5/31/19 at 9:26 am to zatetic
quote:
I'm saying they are both very bad
You are arguing apples and oranges. There is no comparison.
quote:
. I get the outlier comment, as most are done when they are a baby so can't comprehend what you never had. If you were always blind you can't comprehend sight fully. But if you became blind later in life you would know what you lost.
What are the long term negative affects of circumcision? Not counting outliers.
What are the long term negative affects of genital mutilation? Not counting outliers.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News