Started By
Message

re: Jerome Corsi refuses Mueller’s plea deal (post Tucker interview)

Posted on 11/27/18 at 4:40 pm to
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48282 posts
Posted on 11/27/18 at 4:40 pm to
Agreed. But if you are aware of communications that appear to be exculpatory....why would you Continue to exclusively post other communications that appear to be incriminating?
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
9902 posts
Posted on 11/27/18 at 4:41 pm to
Hail posted those earlier in this thread (mid-page 4). They've already been entered into thread evidence, counselor.
This post was edited on 11/27/18 at 4:42 pm
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48282 posts
Posted on 11/27/18 at 4:44 pm to
Good. I expect you will be mindful of them as you proceed...wouldn’t want to appear biased.
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 11/27/18 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

The emails were 'stolen' should not invalidate the contents and leave nothing to be followed up on for the details revealed by the emails.

You know, that's really comical stuff coming from the people who say the Mueller investigation should not matter because the FISA warrants were obtained under suspicious circumstances (even when they were perfectly legal).

For the record, as a Democrat having seen the contents of these emails, I DIDN'T GIVE A RAT'S arse because I saw absolutely nothing illegal.

You can't say the same about Manafort, Flynn, Papadopoulas, Gates, etc, etc, etc, and ultimately you will not be able to say the same about Stone, Corsi, Trump Jr, Kushner, and Trump.
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64651 posts
Posted on 11/27/18 at 5:01 pm to
What exactly have those mentioned by name done that was illegal in connection with the election? Charges laid on them have to do with other things not related to the election.

Obama's administration has done many illegal things against political opposition. Deny and project.


Obama


But let us worry the people a boot Russian.
This post was edited on 11/27/18 at 5:03 pm
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
27449 posts
Posted on 11/27/18 at 5:01 pm to
THe only crime would be conducted by the people that actually did the hack and maybe Wikileaks has minor exposure, but Corsi and Stone are nothing more than tricksters in all of this.

Assange had been dropping hints for months about what he had. Actually, when the drop came, it came as no surprise. The fact tat Corsi and Stone figured this stuff out is not criminal nor is it treasonous

So, ummmm what did Flynn do that was criminal or illegal....meeting with Russians as NSA designate is not illegal

Manafort got popped on fudging his taxes and on a loan application ( which if uniformly applied would put anyone who has gotten a mortgage in jail)

PapaD got caught up in a POS perjury trap and it was soooooooo egregious that the judge gave him 14 days

None of the people you mentioned were in bed with Putin and the Russians. Did Trump do business with Russians on Real Estate deals .....yep he also did it with Saudis and UAE types and Euro-trash . BTW Hilldawg and Willie were doing things with Russians as well and Podesta was doing shite in Eastern Europe as well


Now, be a good dawg and go outside and use the yard to do your business
Posted by YankeeBama
Milwaukee
Member since Sep 2017
4741 posts
Posted on 11/27/18 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

You know, that's really comical stuff coming from the people who say the Mueller investigation should not matter because the FISA warrants were obtained under suspicious circumstances (even when they were perfectly legal).


Got to give it to you on this one. Good point. Either way, the content of the SC probe is being investigated to an overkill.
This post was edited on 11/28/18 at 10:16 am
Posted by OleWar
Troy H. Middleton Library
Member since Mar 2008
5828 posts
Posted on 11/27/18 at 6:08 pm to
My God, talk about overstating the threat. She claims that the Russians have discredited US intelligence services, the premise of her article does more to discredit intelligence services and law enforcement than anything I have ever read. Maybe she is a Russian agent and should be investigated.
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 11/27/18 at 6:17 pm to
Funny you didn't ispeculate on why they felt the need to lie about it all... if it was all so innocent and everything.
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
78010 posts
Posted on 11/27/18 at 6:44 pm to
Oh you
Posted by BUGAtGOAT
Munroe
Member since Oct 2015
1824 posts
Posted on 11/27/18 at 7:02 pm to
Corsi coming up in Tucker soon
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
36014 posts
Posted on 11/27/18 at 7:10 pm to
Tucker: if you subjected Mueller to the same standard as he does the targets of his investigation, you could charge him with a multitude of crimes.

This is the leviathan the Democrats want and it should frighten everyone. For all their talk about fascism and authoritarianism, the Special Counsel is the closest thing in this country to actual fascism.
Posted by flyAU
Scottsdale
Member since Dec 2010
24848 posts
Posted on 11/27/18 at 7:12 pm to
quote:

I will not lie to save my life.


Something a liar would say.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67787 posts
Posted on 11/27/18 at 7:13 pm to
Explained very well how failing a memory test can become a federal crime.
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 11/27/18 at 7:14 pm to
He lies to sell books to morons, but won't to save his life.

Suuuuuuuuuuuuure, I believe that.
Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 11/27/18 at 7:14 pm to
The best people!!!
Posted by YankeeBama
Milwaukee
Member since Sep 2017
4741 posts
Posted on 11/27/18 at 7:30 pm to
My post interview assessment:

Mueller might not have anything on him
He has definitely not met Julian Assange
He lied about “connecting the dots”, but mueller can’t prove it
Somebody gave him info
This post was edited on 11/27/18 at 7:33 pm
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
27449 posts
Posted on 11/28/18 at 9:34 am to
Dumbass, you don't understand perjury traps do you? You say it was Tuesday, a year ago......Mueller comes back and says no , we have proof that it was Monday 11 months ago. That is a perjury trap

first pageprev pagePage 7 of 7Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram