- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: J.D. Vance wants people with kids to be in a lower tax bracket than people without kids.
Posted on 7/26/24 at 5:28 pm to TrueTiger
Posted on 7/26/24 at 5:28 pm to TrueTiger
quote:Like most they have no idea what's in the tax code, or how basic accounting works. They just know how to rage when some influence tells them to.
This is actually our current tax code.
Nothing better than guy who takes 30% in pre-tax deductions and deductable health care. and HMITC, student loan interest deduction, crying about "tax breaks for millionairs and billionaires".
Posted on 7/26/24 at 5:30 pm to the808bass
quote:
Letting people who have kids keep more of their money than they would normally give to the government is not “taxing people just because they don’t have kids.”
Why shouldn’t everyone just keep more of their money than choosing this characteristic as a winner? Would it be a conservative spot if descendants of the Clintons kept more of their own money?
Posted on 7/26/24 at 5:31 pm to GumboPot
There is a need for some administrators, but we don’t need fricking 30 different nurses in bullshite spreadsheet-reporting positions getting 60k/year
Posted on 7/26/24 at 5:31 pm to nugget
So JD wants a baby mama with 5 kids to get rewarded? It’s an asinine position.
Posted on 7/26/24 at 5:32 pm to nugget
quote:Where did anyone argue that only people with kids should pay less taxes? Did I miss that? Or did you just make that part up?
Why shouldn’t everyone just keep more of their money than choosing this characteristic as a winner?
Posted on 7/26/24 at 5:32 pm to Ancient Astronaut
Holy shite. You guys are actually making me defend this guy 
Posted on 7/26/24 at 5:33 pm to LSU Grad Alabama Fan
Well first of all no one ever have to pay one penny in income tax.
But I’m perfectly fine with this.
In fact I’m all for it and would be even if I didn’t have kids.
But I’m perfectly fine with this.
In fact I’m all for it and would be even if I didn’t have kids.
Posted on 7/26/24 at 5:34 pm to Ancient Astronaut
quote:
So JD wants a baby mama with 5 kids to get rewarded?
I can't understand getting all upset that people that actually pay taxes, paying slightly less taxes is outrageous incentivizing... but the free healthcare, food, and everything the government pays for isn't.
This is the thing y'all want to rage over?
Posted on 7/26/24 at 5:35 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:quote:
Should the mortgage interests deduction be allowed?
We're taxing people for not buying a home!
Posted on 7/26/24 at 5:37 pm to LSU Grad Alabama Fan
Stupid shite!
They already get tax breaks for carpet crawlers.
How stupid do both of you have to be???????
They already get tax breaks for carpet crawlers.
How stupid do both of you have to be???????
Posted on 7/26/24 at 5:38 pm to Ancient Astronaut
quote:
So JD wants a baby mama with 5 kids to get rewarded? It’s an asinine position.
Bru. Baby mamas with five kids aren’t paying taxes.
Posted on 7/26/24 at 5:39 pm to nugget
quote:
Why shouldn’t everyone just keep more of their money than choosing this characteristic as a winner?
I have already advocated for that in this thread. Welcome to three pages ago.
Posted on 7/26/24 at 5:39 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Did I miss that?
Yes, you did. If you give a tax credit to only a specific group of people, as opposed to everyone, then the ones you’re not giving a credit to pay more taxes.
Posted on 7/26/24 at 5:40 pm to nugget
quote:
Yes, you did. If you give a tax credit to only a specific group of people, as opposed to everyone, then the ones you’re not giving a credit to pay more taxes.
You need to find a lawyer to sue whatever high school awarded you a diploma. There’s some obvious malfeasance on their part.
Posted on 7/26/24 at 5:40 pm to nugget
quote:Nah. You can be a proponent of both.
Yes, you did. If you give a tax credit to only a specific group of people, as opposed to everyone, then the ones you’re not giving a credit to pay more taxes.
Posted on 7/26/24 at 5:40 pm to the808bass
I want the good nugget back.
Posted on 7/26/24 at 5:41 pm to the808bass
But you also want to choose who gets to keep extra and who effectively pays a larger share
Posted on 7/26/24 at 5:42 pm to the808bass
This is their hero. Trying to use a hammer.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 7/26/24 at 5:42 pm to the808bass
quote:
I want the good nugget back.
I’ll fall back in the party line. Sorry, comrade
Posted on 7/26/24 at 5:43 pm to LSU Grad Alabama Fan
we already are in a lower bracket when you have children.....tax credits.
Whats the fuss?
Whats the fuss?
Popular
Back to top



0



