- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jamie Raskin says Congress will stop Donald Trump on J6, 2025 using the 14th Amendment
Posted on 8/5/24 at 1:33 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Posted on 8/5/24 at 1:33 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Precisely why I’ve been saying you can’t vote yourself out of communism.
0
Posted on 8/5/24 at 1:33 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
What exactly is he suggesting they will do?
More #MuhInsurrection lawfare retardation.
Posted on 8/5/24 at 1:39 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
the 14th Amendment
The new Constitution. Thanks, Radical Republicans.
Posted on 8/5/24 at 1:39 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Good luck with that, Jamie! When was Trump charged with, let alone convicted of, insurrection?
This post was edited on 8/5/24 at 3:23 pm
Posted on 8/5/24 at 1:40 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
If ever did anything so stupid and crazy, red states will secede
Posted on 8/5/24 at 1:42 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Raskin should have been an abortion.
Posted on 8/5/24 at 1:42 pm to HonoraryCoonass
quote:
It says you can’t hold any of several offices, including president, if you’d taken part of an insurrection. It was written shortly after the Civil War, with southerners in mind. It’s also why, during, and immediately after January 6th, all the dimocratixes and the media remarkably and “independently” came up with the exact same descriptor for the riot…….it was an “insurrection.”” They chose that word purposely. They were laying the groundwork for what we are seeing here
Thank you. Didn't Colorado already try this?
Posted on 8/5/24 at 1:52 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
An Insurrection, no?
Posted on 8/5/24 at 1:53 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
This would be a really smart play on their part... I don't think it would end like they think it would...
Posted on 8/5/24 at 2:00 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
I have some bad news for this dude.
If Trump manages to beat the machine and win in November and congress pulls some frickery to try to prevent Trump from taking office, there likely isn’t enough protection in the world for him and his ilk.
If Trump manages to beat the machine and win in November and congress pulls some frickery to try to prevent Trump from taking office, there likely isn’t enough protection in the world for him and his ilk.
This post was edited on 8/5/24 at 2:07 pm
Posted on 8/5/24 at 2:08 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
Colorado already try this?
They did, and SCOTUS said it was up to Congress to remove him, not the state court system. So Raskin et al will try to remove him even if he wins.
Posted on 8/5/24 at 2:09 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
Didn’t Colorado try this?
Sort of. The CO Supreme Court used the 14th to keep him off the ballot in CO. In Trump v Anderson, the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously ruled in Trump’s favor reversing the CO decision and its interpretation of the 14th Amendment. Legislatively, there are some things that Congress could accomplish that might make the 14th Amendment applicable, but that would be extremely unlikely to even get out of committee in the House much less passed by the House and Senate.
Posted on 8/5/24 at 2:09 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
What exactly is he suggesting they will do?
Pass legislation pursuant to the Amendment, likely specifically-tailored to what Trump did
Posted on 8/5/24 at 2:10 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
Didn't Colorado already try this?
The state did via their state voting laws. The USSC said this was not valid and Congress had to pass a law (as they have before). No other body can pass a law pursuant to the 14A to rely on the power of this specific clause.
Posted on 8/5/24 at 2:11 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:They have lost their minds.
Section 3 of the 14th Amendment is a part of the U.S. Constitution that gives Congress the authority to bar public officials, who took an oath of allegiance to the U.S. Constitution, from holding office if they "engaged in insurrection or rebellion" against the Constitution or gave aid or comfort to its enemies1234. This section was enacted after the Civil War to prevent former Confederate officials from returning to power
Raskin goes on to say it is all the SCOTUS' fault.
Are these people from the same planet?
This post was edited on 8/5/24 at 2:13 pm
Posted on 8/5/24 at 2:12 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Raskin could tell me water was wet and it would make me want to consult a chemist just to make sure.
Posted on 8/5/24 at 2:14 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Funny that the x link posted has 666 replies, number of the beast
Posted on 8/5/24 at 2:16 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
They wouldn't get enough votes
Posted on 8/5/24 at 2:19 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
So... he expects Trump to beat Kamala.
Posted on 8/5/24 at 2:20 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:
Good luck with that, Jamie? When was Trump charged with, let alone convicted of, insurrection?
Has anyone been charged with insurrection from Jan 6th?
I thought most people were charged woth trespassing.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News