1
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jamie Raskin promises Dems will go after corporations and law firms that helped Trump
Posted on 11/5/26 at 9:55 am to FredBear
Posted on 11/5/26 at 9:55 am to FredBear
quote:
Does that include Omar?
Ask BoarEd, he made 19 threads about it. But we'll find out!
They still haven't told us what evidence they have (or what they found)...
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Posted on 11/5/26 at 9:55 am to udtiger
quote:
Did I miss something?
quote:
US Senate Conviction Threshold: Removing a president or official from office via impeachment conviction requires a two-thirds supermajority vote, which equals 67 votes
Posted on 11/5/26 at 9:55 am to mwade91383
quote:
Lawfare is bad. Rooting out corruption is good.
The problem is the other side jsut pretends everything is the former when the truth is closer to the latter
Lawfare is creating a law, just to target an individual.
Lawfare is using courts to stop the execution of long standing law as the enforcement of these laws are being carried out.
Only one party has done these things.
Posted on 11/5/26 at 9:56 am to Ailsa
The hunt is on! 
Posted on 11/5/26 at 9:56 am to mwade91383
quote:
They still haven't told us what evidence they have
You seem to act as if you are important enough to know
Posted on 11/5/26 at 9:57 am to CleverUserName
You're obfuscating. We both know why but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt one more time anyway...
Simple question, do you think criminals should be let off the hook if it doesn't reduce costs for Americans?
Simple question, do you think criminals should be let off the hook if it doesn't reduce costs for Americans?
Posted on 11/5/26 at 9:59 am to mwade91383
quote:
To be clear: is corruption bad? If we find it, should we go after it?
If not, how do we ever deter it in the future?
Federal Democrat judges blocked every DOGE fraud investigation they could.
I wonder why.
This post was edited on 11/5/26 at 10:00 am
Posted on 11/5/26 at 9:59 am to mwade91383
quote:
To be clear: is corruption bad? If we find it, should we go after it?
Yes, go after all of it. Voter Fraud, money laundering through NGO's, insider trading, kickbacks, conspiracies against government officials, enriching one's family illegally, securing government contracts illegally, extorting foreign governments, using one's office/position to sell access. And anything else regardless of party should be prosecuted.
Having said that, The Dems just campaigned that Trump was using the DOJ for retribution. This was a winning political tactic.
Now the Dems look to employ the same methods against Trump and whoever else they feel like going after. Politically, it will backfire.
The vast majority of people that switched from voting for R's to D's this time want relief economically. If they see a constant Dog and Pony show in Congress, and no relief, they will turn on the Dems.
Posted on 11/5/26 at 9:59 am to Ailsa
Good way to chase corporations over seas.
Smart move.
Smart move.
Posted on 11/5/26 at 10:01 am to UtahCajun
quote:
You seem to act as if you are important enough to know
He's being purposely obtuse. What he really means is he wants what he considers the other side to be investigated, not his side
Posted on 11/5/26 at 10:01 am to Ailsa
quote:
If they have 67 seats...which they will in january...unless something changes, they can overrule a veto.
They won't be close to 2/3 majority.
Posted on 11/5/26 at 10:02 am to Ailsa
I keep reading and hearing “corruption”, but not of what Trump is accused.
And just how did companies help Trump? Help him do what?
And just how did companies help Trump? Help him do what?
Posted on 11/5/26 at 10:02 am to mwade91383
quote:
Simple question, do you think criminals should be let off the hook if it doesn't reduce costs for Americans?
Yes
Do you?
Posted on 11/5/26 at 10:04 am to mwade91383
quote:
You're obfuscating. We both know why but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt one more time anyway...
I'm obfuscating by asking what the dems are doing to actually perform the promises they made continually to get elected? And have repeated as a priority since the election? Really?
Why is the question so hard to answer? I asked it multiple times yesterday with zero replies and now several today.
quote:
Simple question, do you think criminals should be let off the hook if it doesn't reduce costs for Americans?
Did you just ask this question with a straight face? Don't you fall on the side of a political party that wants to dismantle part of Homeland Security because they are arresting people that have broke the law? If not multiple laws?
Posted on 11/5/26 at 10:05 am to i am dan
DOGE failed spectacularly for three reasons.
1) Completley whiffing on the actual cost drivers (fraud was miniscule by %, they looked for it, A LOT)
2) staff by completley unqualified hacks. Sorry you thought a 19yo named BiG Balls was going to solve our complex financial proglems, that your own damn fault.
3) Trying to blatantly illegaly circumvent Congress.
Acting like DOGE was some victim and not just destined to fail from the get go is delusional nonsense, given what we know now....
1) Completley whiffing on the actual cost drivers (fraud was miniscule by %, they looked for it, A LOT)
2) staff by completley unqualified hacks. Sorry you thought a 19yo named BiG Balls was going to solve our complex financial proglems, that your own damn fault.
3) Trying to blatantly illegaly circumvent Congress.
Acting like DOGE was some victim and not just destined to fail from the get go is delusional nonsense, given what we know now....
Posted on 11/5/26 at 10:06 am to Wildcat1996
quote:
I keep reading and hearing “corruption”, but not of what Trump is accused.
And just how did companies help Trump? Help him do what?
Donations or moving back to the US from overseas to run their businesses and increase our GDP?
Posted on 11/5/26 at 10:06 am to mwade91383
You own this mother fricker. You guys always overplay....like clockwork.
Posted on 11/5/26 at 10:08 am to CleverUserName
Yes, you're intentionally ignoring the subject of the thread itself.
Why don't you start a new thread about it, maybe then you'll get the emotional validation you so desperatley seek....
Why don't you start a new thread about it, maybe then you'll get the emotional validation you so desperatley seek....
Posted on 11/5/26 at 10:09 am to FatAndTired
quote:
They can't do anything without the Executive.
Congressional investigations
Posted on 11/5/26 at 10:10 am to Ailsa
quote:
quote:
Did I miss something?
quote:
US Senate Conviction Threshold: Removing a president or official from office via impeachment conviction requires a two-thirds supermajority vote, which equals 67 votes
I fricking know that. Dems aren't going to have 67 votes (at least not on their own) which is what you post stated would happen in January.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News