- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jack Smith lied to Congress under oath
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't have to plead
I must be getting you confused with another poster with a similar name who is constantly getting dragged.
This post was edited on 7/14/26 at 8:28 pm
1
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't have to plead. You conceded and prove that I was right yourself
No counselor, he did concede anything. He just noted your vigor for being right even though you are not. He also noted that anyone that is correct/right never has to work to prove it. Your post count alone proves that you try to prove yourself “right”. Listen to me chief, just because you think you are “right” does not equate to the majority thinking you are “right”. In fact, your arguments here would indicate that you have a loosing record.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:37 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Smith was specifically asked about *toll records* obtained from *Members of Congress.* He accurately said those records didn’t include message content.
Grassley's docs relate to texts of *WH officials,* obtained via *NARA,* which happened to include exchanges w/ congresspeople.
Someone else pointed this out earlier.
Another fail
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:38 pm to G2160
quote:
who is constantly getting dragged.
I'm not.
People like you fail, and then claim victory and use language like that to cover for your failure.
You're this meme, but real
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:38 pm to uggabugga
Will Trump n Co continue to be cowardly lions and not arrest him?
Asking for the country.
Asking for the country.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:39 pm to idlewatcher
Probably not in the make believe way you think it should happen.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:41 pm to uggabugga
quote:
Jack Smith swore under oath that he didn't spy on text messages belonging to members of Congress. Today: New evidence confirms he spied on dozens of members of Congress, myself included.
lock his arse up then...
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:49 pm to Warboo
The reason he is melting is because he previously posted that anyone who suggested that Jack smith was illegally spying on people was absurd, and now Jack smith has been caught illegally spying on people.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:51 pm to G2160
quote:
The reason he is melting
Says the guy who got proven wrong and has engaged in multiple ad homs.
quote:
because he previously posted that anyone who suggested that Jack smith was illegally spying on people was absurd,
Like this.
Straw man and ad hom all in one.
The sign of actual melting
quote:
and now Jack smith has been caught illegally spying on people.
This post was edited on 7/14/26 at 8:51 pm
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:51 pm to G2160
quote:
The reason he is melting is because he previously posted that anyone who suggested that Jack smith was illegally spying on people was absurd, and now Jack smith has been caught illegally spying on people.
I know, hell everyone here knows. He is a joke and still keeps doubling down.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:54 pm to Warboo
whatcha going to do Paulie??? nothing
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:57 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Being right pretty much all the time by definition means I'm rarely wrong.
Dude, put down the bong and don't drink the water.
From Mike Davis on Truth Social who is a very successful Constitutional Attorney, unlike you.
???? Mike Davis ????
@mrddmia
Mike Davis: Jack Smith lied. He said that he did not get their text messages, and now we know from Chuck Grassley's oversight and Ron Johnson's oversight that Jack Smith did get text messages. Jack Smith needs to be indicted and put in prison.
·
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:57 pm to SlowFlowPro
You think they’ll call it the Deep State when Jack isn’t prosecuted for this because of the technicalities you and I have highlighted for them?
Posted on 7/14/26 at 9:10 pm to uggabugga
OK, so I'll wait and see if anything happens before I get excited.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 9:11 pm to boosiebadazz
there is a certain Nuance on here that I think people might be skipping over.
for the DOJ to subpoena call logs from cellular providers that is a very specific subpoena with a very specific focus.
To also receive text messages would require the cellular providersto download the contents of the users phone, segregate them into text messages and then provide those text messages to the DOJ. That would be a completely separate subpoena with a very specific focus.
I think that what we may be scratching around here is Smith through his office at the FBI, actually spying on these 44 people, capturing their text messages, probably through the NSA and then trying to use the call log subpoena as cover for the data that they illegally had.
The way Congress would differentiate this is to have someone from the cellular providers comment on how the legal mechanisms were put in place to force them to gather the text messages. Download them and then provide them in file files for the DOJ review.
Text messages and call logs are two separate files
for the DOJ to subpoena call logs from cellular providers that is a very specific subpoena with a very specific focus.
To also receive text messages would require the cellular providersto download the contents of the users phone, segregate them into text messages and then provide those text messages to the DOJ. That would be a completely separate subpoena with a very specific focus.
I think that what we may be scratching around here is Smith through his office at the FBI, actually spying on these 44 people, capturing their text messages, probably through the NSA and then trying to use the call log subpoena as cover for the data that they illegally had.
The way Congress would differentiate this is to have someone from the cellular providers comment on how the legal mechanisms were put in place to force them to gather the text messages. Download them and then provide them in file files for the DOJ review.
Text messages and call logs are two separate files
This post was edited on 7/14/26 at 9:13 pm
Posted on 7/14/26 at 9:12 pm to Speckhunter2012
quote:
From Mike Davis o
Do you realize how many things he's made a fool of himself over the past 8 years?
Posted on 7/14/26 at 9:17 pm to supatigah
quote:
Smith through his office at the FBI, actually spying on these 44 people, capturing their text messages, probably through the NSA
How many people would be in on this and what kind of paper and electronic trail would it create? That’s always the problem with grand conspiracies- too many lackies would have to be involved.
The clip of Smith shows him being asked specifically about toll records. Toll records record incoming number, outgoing number, call length, and times of connect and disconnect. No content. That’s what he said.
There’s suggestion that what Grassley is talking about are NARA records where WH officials’ comms were kept and produced and congresspeople showed up in there.
That would explain the discrepancy and how/why Jack was not lying about something so simple and easily proven/disproven with the toll records.
This post was edited on 7/14/26 at 9:20 pm
Posted on 7/14/26 at 9:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
as someone who is involved currently in two separate legal proceedings that have required me to be subpoenaed for my phone records. I can tell you that the way to do that directly is to subpoena the phone and the phone owner provides the phone to a forensic company to download.
My phone was subpoenaed and I provided it twice. this established a chain of custody that the information was actually on my phone.
To have the contents of my phone be acquired without me participating in it requires the provider or a third-party monitoring system like the FBI OR NSA gather the data and pull the phone info without me knowing it
the calls logs could have easily been subpoenaed, to get text messages is much more difficult
My phone was subpoenaed and I provided it twice. this established a chain of custody that the information was actually on my phone.
To have the contents of my phone be acquired without me participating in it requires the provider or a third-party monitoring system like the FBI OR NSA gather the data and pull the phone info without me knowing it
the calls logs could have easily been subpoenaed, to get text messages is much more difficult
Posted on 7/14/26 at 9:18 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
How many people would be in on this and what kind of paper and electronic trail would it create? That’s always the problem with grand conspiracies- too many lackies would have to be involved.
would have required top down approvals, Mr. Smith is in a very tricky situation
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News