- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/14/26 at 9:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
At least I can read
Congrats. I did not read the OP Link. I am merely going off of the last 10 years of seeing what our government, under the Deep State has become.
There are no laws if you are on their side.
Eric Holder? LOL No harm no foul.
Hunter Laptop? No harm no foul.
Russian Hoax? No harm no foul.
Ukraine phone call? No harm no foul.
J6 when PDJT requested NG and Pelosi refused? No harm no foul.
Indicting PDJT supporters while allowing leftists even more egregious actions? No harm no foul.
I could go on and on.
Keep sniffing your own farts and thinking you know it all.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 9:49 pm to ninthward
Prison is only for Conservatives/Republicans...
Posted on 7/14/26 at 9:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
No one believes anything you say.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 9:51 pm to G2160
quote:
No one believes anything you say.
They should start listening to me
quote:
In aone-sentence order, a three-judge panel from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals turned back a request for a rehearing of a case it decided in February arguing that Mueller should have been nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. Separately, the D.C. Circuit on Monday alsodenied a petition for a rehearing before the full court.
At issue is a case challenging Mueller’s authority brought by Andrew Miller, who refused to testify before a federal grand jury under subpoena about his former employer, the longtime Trump adviser Roger Stone.
Miller’s attorneys moved to quash the subpoena by citing alleged flaws in Mueller’s appointment butlost in a unanimous opinion that found no flaw in Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s May 2017 decision to put the special counsel on the job investigating Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 9:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
Stopped reading when I saw you linked a 2019 article to make some point about a 2024 ruling on the constitutionality of Jack smith.
Going to be tough to argue how this proves you’re right, but I know this is a hill you’re prepared to die on.
Going to be tough to argue how this proves you’re right, but I know this is a hill you’re prepared to die on.
Page 8 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News