- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jack Smith Court Filing-If Trump reelected, will incite to murder Democrat politicians
Posted on 1/5/24 at 9:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 1/5/24 at 9:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
....... wut
Tough to understand with Biden’s dick in your mouth, huh?
Posted on 1/5/24 at 9:19 pm to BBONDS25
quote:I get that. And I'm starting to understand why SCOTUS didn't take up the issue.
SFP and I back different candidates. But he is correct here. The court must consider the precedent set. Even if absurd.
quote:Fair point.
Yep. Blanket immunity leads to absurd results. The argument needs to be tightened.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 9:19 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
Tough to understand with Biden’s dick in your mouth, huh?
Again....wut?
You may be experiencing a psychological break and may need to seek immediate medical attention
Posted on 1/5/24 at 9:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You may be experiencing a psychological break and may need to seek immediate medical attention
Nope, you were hit with your own stupid logic and you can’t respond because you know an honest response destroys the metal gymnastics you’re trying here.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 9:26 pm to Houag80
quote:
He is truly a lunatic.
Well, he’s a leftist so that’s to be expected.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 9:27 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
And I'm starting to understand why SCOTUS didn't take up the issue.
SCOTUS completely anticipates having to take up the matter, in due time.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 9:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
I suppose this isn't political, perfectly normal legal proceeding huh? Trump saved the NYCity ice skating rink. Brought tremendous business;but now he is banned and has to Pay $270M yeah thats nornal, sure sure--explain this away.
Here is you looking for the needle in the haystack
waiting for your honest, thoughtful, nuance of a convoluted fricked-up answer

Here is you looking for the needle in the haystack
waiting for your honest, thoughtful, nuance of a convoluted fricked-up answer

This post was edited on 1/5/24 at 9:32 pm
Posted on 1/5/24 at 9:54 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
you were hit with your own stupid logic and you can’t respond because you know an honest response destroys the metal gymnastics
Posted on 1/5/24 at 9:59 pm to cajunangelle
The frustration comes from his camp getting hit with bizarre legal theories over non crimes or weak allegations, having to go before adversarial courts and make arguments, like immunity for example, that are potential legal rabbit holes, themselves. It’s like “collusion” all over again.
I’d like to see the SCOTUS come out strong in the Colorado decision and hopefully send a signal to Smith and these Soros DAs that the lawfare will ultimately fail on appeal.
Whether Trump is president or not, these tactics have to be forcefully rejected with consequences, or else they’ll continue doing it to whoever happens to be the rights biggest political champion at the time. Then we just become Russia… if we are not already there.
I’d like to see the SCOTUS come out strong in the Colorado decision and hopefully send a signal to Smith and these Soros DAs that the lawfare will ultimately fail on appeal.
Whether Trump is president or not, these tactics have to be forcefully rejected with consequences, or else they’ll continue doing it to whoever happens to be the rights biggest political champion at the time. Then we just become Russia… if we are not already there.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 10:45 pm to cajunangelle
I was already going to vote for him, you don’t have to sell me on it.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 11:52 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
Jack Smith Court Filing-If Trump reelected, will incite to murder Democrat politicians
I can't figure out if this statement is supposed to bolster or errode support for Trump
Posted on 1/6/24 at 3:06 am to cajunangelle
As always, passive aggressive projection; Smiih doing to Trump exactly what he accuses Trump off. Yet the dupes and useful idiots will lap it up and scream for Trump’s murder. They are taking this Nation to a total collapse. Like this Forum hasn’t know that Cloward-Piven is real, for years. Lord have mercy on them who love. The coming time will be hard.
Posted on 1/6/24 at 5:13 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Just keeps getting funnier
I know, right?
Government standards and policy create absurd results every day.
Posted on 1/6/24 at 7:56 am to cajunangelle
quote:
will incite to murder Democrat politicians
shouldnt be limited to democrats only…
Popular
Back to top

1











