- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jack Smith Court Filing-If Trump reelected, will incite to murder Democrat politicians
Posted on 1/5/24 at 4:40 pm to cajunangelle
Posted on 1/5/24 at 4:40 pm to cajunangelle
Based on what???? Jack Smith opinion? These fricking communist are stupid. We're about to find out where we the people stand. Do we belong to the rich corporations or do we stand on the constitution?
0
Posted on 1/5/24 at 5:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
..and here is SFP to frick up another thread.
I find him to be both stupid and obnoxious- both very bad qualities
I can't tell you how many threads the idiot posts in and then halfway through responding you find out he/she/it has not read the article or premise. Just some stupid argumentative comments
Posted on 1/5/24 at 5:16 pm to cajunangelle
I mean is that really a bad thing?
Posted on 1/5/24 at 5:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm not deflecting. You're confused and I'm trying to help you.
You're as helpful as Oweo walking an old lady across the street
Posted on 1/5/24 at 5:22 pm to cajunangelle
This is projection and it's inviting someone to do this because it makes the left appear as if that is their desired course of action. Why else would they bring up something like this, if they didn't have it planned themselves?
When you put an animal into a corner, it either cowers or attacks. How long before the American people, especially those that have been targeted by the left, decide to attack?
It's almost like a provocation by the left. These are deranged, evil people.
I think we can all see their game though - they want to push and push, violate the Constitution, target political opponents, and then when the violent pushback comes they want to be able to target half the nation as "insurrectionists" and so forth, so they can go full draconian.
It's manufactured. It's theater. It's a pathological lust for power.
When you put an animal into a corner, it either cowers or attacks. How long before the American people, especially those that have been targeted by the left, decide to attack?
It's almost like a provocation by the left. These are deranged, evil people.
I think we can all see their game though - they want to push and push, violate the Constitution, target political opponents, and then when the violent pushback comes they want to be able to target half the nation as "insurrectionists" and so forth, so they can go full draconian.
It's manufactured. It's theater. It's a pathological lust for power.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 5:29 pm to cajunangelle
If you didn’t have a reason to vote for Trump, this should do the trick
Posted on 1/5/24 at 5:29 pm to dafif
quote:
I can't tell you how many threads the idiot posts in and then halfway through responding you find out he/she/it has not read the article or premise
I've even read the actual brief
Posted on 1/5/24 at 5:30 pm to POTUS2024
quote:
Why else would they bring up something like this, if they didn't have it planned themselves?
I explained in detail
Posted on 1/5/24 at 5:35 pm to cajunangelle
I wouldn’t be opposed to what MAGA espousing what Jack Smith is afraid of.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 5:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
you better high-tail it to X twitter, look what is trending...
Danger to our democracy
quote:Lunatic fringe
Politics · Trending
Hillary Clinton
81K posts
Politics · Trending
Satan
43.1K posts
Politics · Trending
Liar
92.8K posts
Politics · Trending
Pelosi
30.2K posts
Danger to our democracy
Posted on 1/5/24 at 5:48 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
The goose-stepping communazis and TDS laden sky screamers idolize Jack Smith.
SlowFag probably has Jack Smith’s picture right next to his Saint Mueller candle on the nightstand. The dude worships lawfare.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 5:53 pm to thebigmuffaletta
boosie outright said lawfare bloggers were fair minded, and only he (and possibly dollbaby) were brilliant enough to see their wonderful nuance as fair moderate case findings.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 6:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
Thanks for proving my point perfectly
Posted on 1/5/24 at 6:18 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
SlowFag probably has Jack Smith’s picture right next to his Saint Mueller candle on the nightstand
Yes the guy who was always out in front saying that Trump was not an asset of Russia and this was an invention of Democrats worships Mueller
quote:
The dude worships lawfare.
No one has even defined what this is for me to make a decision about
Posted on 1/5/24 at 6:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I read the brief and confirmed this is exactly what he was doing
Confirmation bias, not confirmation.
quote:
These are all examples to show how extreme/absurd the position Trump's attorney argue re: Presidential immunity.
No, these are things that are put into the brief, deliberately, to be inflammatory, dramatic, and fear mongering. They bear all the hallmarks of projection, and are aligned with the words and behavior of the left, to include office holders. We even have a direct quote from Biden saying he will use the full power of his office and the Constitution to make sure Trump does not take power again, and yet Smith wants to parade examples to tell us that under Trump, things could get extreme? No one is buying what Smith is selling.
quote:
Nobody is arguing Trump "will" do any of this stuff.
That is exactly what they are suggesting, by just throwing it out there. This is exactly how the left characterizes Trump every single day and poof, there it is in a court filing.
It is mendacious to pawn off this scheme, pretending this brief is anything but a dog whistle.
The Trump administration and people on the right have been physically attacked by the left, and there have been direct calls from politicians to "get in their face and tell them they are not welcomed" etc, along with Biden's declaration, and the DOJ has not once issued even an opinion or cautionary note on this behavior and how office will not spare someone from prosecution for activities or incitement - yet you want us to believe the DOJ is now concerned about Trump, or that they are legitimately concerned about this list of hypotheticals? No, no one is buying any of this tripe.
These are deranged, maniacal, evil pieces of garbage who found their way into high places within our government. Their mental illness and evil disposition are on full display.
As much as I despise Trump for being lazy, stupid, and not having the sack to do the job but only the lust for winning an election, the man is being targeted and is the subject of political persecution. That is the only characterization for this.
It's worse than pathetically ironic that Smith has the balls to invoke phrases like 'bedrock commitment to the rule of law', as his Department violates law and Constitution with impunity and de facto immunity because they are the ones that should be prosecuting such behavior, and magically, they seem to evade that every time. Violate provisions of FISA, no problem. Profound levels of misconduct with the Ted Stevens case, no problem. Fabricate terrorism cases, no problem. It's never a problem when the DOJ and FBI do it, and it's never a problem when the left does it, but for someone not on the left, then there's a problem. Thomas Mackey has to go to prison for years, for a meme but the 51 intel "professionals" face...nothing.
This is not about justice. This is about power and the sadistic desire to inflict evil upon others. You know this but you can't seem to muster the integrity to call it what it is.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 6:23 pm to cajunangelle
Lmao wow. This is the guy they are hanging their hopes on? There goes any shred of credibility he may have had.
I am actually (no gif) shocked by this.
I am actually (no gif) shocked by this.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 6:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
“Lawfare” seems pretty self explanatory, at least to me. I interpret it as the practice of using “law” as a weapon of political warfare. The term “law” is where there might be some varying definitions I suppose.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 6:41 pm to davyjones
quote:
The term “law” is where there might be some varying definitions I suppose.
Weapon is the bigger one.
It denotes some sort of fraud or impropriety. How do we determine that?
This usually goes off the rails here but I'll try again: what if Trump is guilty of the (a?) crimes he's accused of? Can a prosecution be illegitimate or improper if the Defendant is guilty?
Then it becomes a question of how we determine this. I think a lot of people have issues with the jury doing it. THAT creates a lot of subjectivity and lots of subjectivity makes a definition difficult.
This post was edited on 1/5/24 at 6:42 pm
Posted on 1/5/24 at 6:51 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
Jack Smith Court Filing-If Trump reelected, will incite to murder Democrat politicians
Like real Americans need more incitement to go after Nazis.
Posted on 1/5/24 at 6:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
? Can a prosecution be illegitimate or improper if the Defendant is guilty?
quote:
Then it becomes a question of how we determine this. I think a lot of people have issues with the jury doing it. THAT creates a lot of subjectivity and lots of subjectivity makes a definition difficult.
Then objectivity in prosecution is paramount in a credible system.
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News