- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It’s becoming clear there is no whistleblower
Posted on 10/1/19 at 9:56 am to Spirit Of Aggieland
Posted on 10/1/19 at 9:56 am to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
there are negotiations that the WB will testify
Yes. The air quoted Whistleblower probably also has a “fear of flying” (quotations deliberate).
0
Posted on 10/1/19 at 9:56 am to Spirit Of Aggieland
You think they are above this after the Russian asset lie?
Come on man.
They told you.
By any means necessary.
#resist
Coordinated messaging from DNC to DNC press hit squad.
It's all there to see in plain sight.
Come on man.
They told you.
By any means necessary.
#resist
Coordinated messaging from DNC to DNC press hit squad.
It's all there to see in plain sight.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 9:57 am to Scruffy
quote:
Now the whistleblower is claiming to have first hand knowledge, which is counter to the entire written complaint.
It doesn't have to be 100% first hand or second hand. The complaint suggests most of the info is second hand, and now the whistleblower says some is first hand. I mean, I know most and some are really ambiguous at this stage, but I don't think it's fair to say that the whistleblower is contradictory based on the language used.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 9:59 am to roadGator
Well, it it’s weekend at Bernie’s then we have a problem.
I think if it’s CIA then we also have a problem because that seems unsettling.
I think if it’s CIA then we also have a problem because that seems unsettling.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:00 am to cahoots
First hand = there was a phone
Second hand = OMB, OMB, OMB
All it takes to be a whistle blower it seems.
If Rs had done this to King Hussein you people would be apoplectic.
But...
Second hand = OMB, OMB, OMB
All it takes to be a whistle blower it seems.
If Rs had done this to King Hussein you people would be apoplectic.
But...
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:01 am to Spirit Of Aggieland
And even if the “whistleblower” testified that doesn’t mean it isn’t an actor playing a role
No more far fetched than the rest of this horse shite
No more far fetched than the rest of this horse shite
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:05 am to roadGator
quote:
All it takes to be a whistle blower it seems.
If Rs had done this to King Hussein you people would be apoplectic.
But...
Do you think the whisteblower is contradictory or not? Forget everything else for a second
This post was edited on 10/1/19 at 10:06 am
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:07 am to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
I think if it’s CIA then we also have a problem because that seems unsettling.
Really? Unsettling?
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:09 am to cahoots
quote:With literally no info as to what they are referring to as being first hand, no idea who this person is and if they even had access to anything, and the complaints statements of consistent 2nd hand sources prior to the now 180 degree change that appeared today, yes, yes I do think he is contradictory.
Do you think the whisteblower is contradictory or not?
This post was edited on 10/1/19 at 10:12 am
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:20 am to Spirit Of Aggieland
......was he????? Because the complaint had another State guy on the phone and he has denied it, in fact he was not at the White House. I hope Pompeo tells them to all frick off and does not show up....and sends boxes of Popeyes Chicken with sides on the day of the hearing.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:30 am to Scruffy
quote:
Now the whistleblower is claiming to have first hand knowledge, which is counter to the entire written complaint.
Scruff, the word just prior to the weekend is that this whistleblower was working in the White House and was a CIA person assigned there. I am going to wager that this person and others KNEW that Trump had migrated a lot of transcripts to the secure server to avoid glory hounding staff from accessing it and leaking it. Prior to the change in the rules/law, this person could not announce this stuff because he/she would have been arrested....dismissed. But once the law was changed, it cvould be used as a whistle blower thing. They ( Schiff & Co) had been waiting for this. If you read the complaint they had been preparing for this since February when Mueller & Co. were leaking out that the report may not be what Democrats, et al were looking for.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:38 am to cahoots
Yes. He's contradicting the WH by suggesting something nefarious was done.
You are honest enough to admit that this is just another bullet fired from the left.
I used to hope Rs were above this. Now I want them to escalate. But they won't because they really aren't that different than Ds.
Frick all the lifetime pols on either side.
We are fools and are getting what we deserve.
You are honest enough to admit that this is just another bullet fired from the left.
I used to hope Rs were above this. Now I want them to escalate. But they won't because they really aren't that different than Ds.
Frick all the lifetime pols on either side.
We are fools and are getting what we deserve.
This post was edited on 10/1/19 at 10:48 am
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:43 am to TBoy
quote:
Yes. The report came from inside the White House. The Democrats don't secretly control the Trump administration.
oh you mean the same white house where wiretapping conversations were had by high ranking officials in the executive to spy on Trump and his admin? THAT THAT White House? how silly
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:46 am to Spirit Of Aggieland
quote:
Alright, if it somehow is proven that there is no actual WB, and the whole thing was coordinated without someone initiating it, then I agree that would be yet another coup attempt.
Fixed. YW.
This post was edited on 10/1/19 at 10:48 am
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:48 am to Eli Goldfinger
I knew as soon as the whistleblower's report and the transcript of the actual phone call were released.
Bongino has once again done some explosive work on the subject, the whole thing is a big joke and a slap in the face to any non-Dem American. It's that blatant.
Add that to Schiff's antics at the hearings and his tweet that predates the whistleblower by 2 weeks but says the exact same info. It's clear he had already heard the same rumor back then, and then 2 weeks later a super-secret individual steps forward to blow the whistle and all of DC lights the torches?
Just read the whistleblower's 9 page report, it was clearly originally written with legal counsel and appears as more than one writer given the different styles throughout.
There's some frickery afoot for sure. Why would someone want to turn what was ACTUALLY said in the call into this fiasco? It's not like you can mishear a couple words and come up with the accusation. Hmmmmm...
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:57 am to roadGator
quote:
Yes. He's contradicting the WH by suggesting something nefarious was done.
That's not what we're talking about dude
quote:
You are honest enough to admit that this is just another bullet fired from the left.
The dishonesty is that you guys are saying it's contradictory to say most of your info is second hand but that some of it is not. That's not contradictory.
Trump is also not being honest about whether second hand info is permissible or whether some rule about that changed. Again, dishonesty.
This is the part where you try to pretend that two wrongs make a right and your side is being honest about everything.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:59 am to cahoots
quote:
The dishonesty is that you guys are saying it's contradictory to say most of your info is second hand but that some of it is not. That's not contradictory
I never said that so...
This is where you pretend that there is no coordinated effort to remove trump by any means necessary?
Posted on 10/1/19 at 11:01 am to TBoy
quote:It was 2nd hand hearsay. Good grief.
The report came from inside the White House.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 11:02 am to Scruffy
quote:
Now the whistleblower is claiming to have first hand knowledge, which is counter to the entire written complaint
Isn't this the IG saying that the whistleblower did have at least some first hand information?
Posted on 10/1/19 at 11:04 am to roadGator
quote:
I never said that so...
Well that's what the thread is about so
quote:
This is where you pretend that there is no coordinated effort to remove trump by any means necessary?
I don't think it's possible for the public to know what's going on now. Too many moving parts. One thing I do know is that Trump and Republicans are being completely dishonest about the whistleblower and the rules governing complaints. That is fact.
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News