- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It’s baffling how Chinese construction has defied post 911 physics.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 2:31 pm to Sassafrasology
Posted on 11/29/25 at 2:31 pm to Sassafrasology
quote:
Building 7 was not hit by a plane.
No, It was hit by a 110 story tall building instead.
Facts matter. And it was likely worse, because rather than impacting just one or two floors from an airplane, WTC7 had 11 floors structurally compromised when WTC1 fell into it
1
Posted on 11/29/25 at 2:36 pm to GhostOfFreedom
quote:
I can only imagine the ground vibrations and flying debris as the towers came down. I am surprise any surrounding buildings within a block, survived.
NIST simulated Building 7 collapse using an FEM program called LS-DYNA. They still refuse to this day to release the .k files for peer review.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 2:47 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
No, a couple of columns bowing will pull the structure above it down.
Oh, so the beams are weak enough to collapse but strong enough to take down other parts that aren't damaged.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 2:47 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
No, It was hit by a 110 story tall building instead.
Facts matter. And it was likely worse, because rather than impacting just one or two floors from an airplane, WTC7 had 11 floors structurally compromised when WTC1 fell into it
I've seen the damage, it was minimal and did no damage to it's core.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 2:49 pm to 3down10
quote:
Oh, so the beams are weak enough to collapse but strong enough to take down other parts that aren't damaged.
There are videos that show this. Instead of trying to guess, go watch one.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 2:52 pm to Sassafrasology
They must not have been recently purchased by a jewish fella who immediately insured them at 3 times their value!
Posted on 11/29/25 at 2:56 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
There are videos that show this. Instead of trying to guess, go watch one.
I know what the claim is, I've been following this topic for almost 25 years.
You repeat the same stupid shite as everyone else, and at the end of the day you'll just keep making appeal to authority fallacies.
Because at the end of the day the NIST investigation wasn't an investigation it was a coverup that manipulated things as much as possible in order to fit the existing narrative of the day.
Which is why they didn't even remotely research the possibility of controlled demolition claiming no evidence despite the FEMA report showing evidence.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 2:57 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Go watch videos of the propaganda I've accepted as fact.
No.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 2:57 pm to 3down10
quote:
You repeat the same stupid shite as everyone else,
Evidently not, since you mischaracterized my earlier posts so badly.
There are videos and articles that explain the structural integrity issue.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 3:16 pm to 3down10
quote:
No.
Because you believe what you choose to believe.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 3:31 pm to UncleLogger
quote:
Oh shite. You must to stick to the government provided 9/11 narrative here. Anything undermining that is verboten.
The earth is flat
Posted on 11/29/25 at 3:34 pm to 3down10
One more time
Towers 1 & 2 were designed differently than all other buildings, with no central columnar support.
WTC #2, despite being hit later, collapsed first. Because more floors above the impact area equaled more mass pushing down on the weakened support structures.
Towers 1 & 2 were designed differently than all other buildings, with no central columnar support.
WTC #2, despite being hit later, collapsed first. Because more floors above the impact area equaled more mass pushing down on the weakened support structures.
This post was edited on 11/29/25 at 3:36 pm
Posted on 11/29/25 at 3:36 pm to 3down10
Are you claiming that the buildings were brought down in a controlled demolition? I’m sure that you are but I’d like to get that clarified.
ETA: never mind. Here it is:
So who put the explosives up there and when did they do it?
ETA: never mind. Here it is:
quote:
Which is why they didn't even remotely research the possibility of controlled demolition claiming no evidence despite the FEMA report showing evidence.
So who put the explosives up there and when did they do it?
This post was edited on 11/29/25 at 4:02 pm
Posted on 11/29/25 at 3:45 pm to Sassafrasology
Dude, two wide body jets full of jet fuel punched holes straight thru the upper structures of the towers.
They destroyed numerous structural beams of the towers, then started a raging inferno inside of it, causing the top sections to collapse in on itself.
They destroyed numerous structural beams of the towers, then started a raging inferno inside of it, causing the top sections to collapse in on itself.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 3:57 pm to Sassafrasology
You’re on to some thing!!!!
Posted on 11/29/25 at 4:05 pm to Sassafrasology
To be fair a jet flying at 500mph didn't ram it.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 4:26 pm to RogerTheShrubber
So the heated, striped and weakened column managed to pull down and bow the non heated, non striped and non weakened ones?
Posted on 11/29/25 at 4:29 pm to Sassafrasology
........and who builds a massive dam (Three Gorges Dam) and doesn't anchor the thing in bedrock.
That thing is literally waiting for the perfect storm.
.....and all them nuke plants downstream from that dam.
Ho Lee Fuk
That thing is literally waiting for the perfect storm.
.....and all them nuke plants downstream from that dam.
Ho Lee Fuk
Posted on 11/29/25 at 4:30 pm to Sassafrasology
Except their bridges are collapsing so there's that.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 4:33 pm to Vise
quote:Yes dumbass. When one strudturall member fails, it's load transfers to the others. Overloading them, until they fail, thus overloading more members.
So the heated, striped and weakened column managed to pull down and bow the non heated, non striped and non weakened ones?
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News