Started By
Message

re: Is there anything more "Deep State" than US military conflict with Iran?

Posted on 6/20/25 at 8:52 am to
Posted by Pecos Pedro
Member since Nov 2024
745 posts
Posted on 6/20/25 at 8:52 am to
I thought OP was a successful attorney with a beautiful wife and children.

Yet here is trolling a political sub forum of an SEC sports website with topic like this at 6 am.

Yikes

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476619 posts
Posted on 6/20/25 at 8:58 am to
quote:

Yet here is trolling a political sub forum



Trolling?

I know I'm biased, but this is one of the better attempts at an actual deep discussion the past few days.
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
150324 posts
Posted on 6/20/25 at 8:59 am to
quote:

Which sovereign nation has Iran invaded immediately prior to this conflict?
how are you defining the Iran-backed Shia in Iraq and Syria going after American bases. The fatemuyoun brigade. Houthis and Hezbollah in Lebanon?

Iran claiming plausible deniability is kind of out of question at this point. Or is that all deep state MIC CIA propaganda as well?
Posted by Seldom Seen
Member since Feb 2016
48737 posts
Posted on 6/20/25 at 9:00 am to
quote:

I mean, this is bordering on full on "globalist" scheme, beyond just the "Deep State" label.




Correct.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476619 posts
Posted on 6/20/25 at 9:01 am to
quote:

how are you defining the Iran-backed Shia in Iraq

Iran sending soldiers to fight in a military conflict to support the natives is not the same as an invasion of a sovereign nation.

quote:

and Syria

Syria was a proxy war between Iran and SA.

Not the same

etc.
Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
7917 posts
Posted on 6/20/25 at 9:03 am to
quote:

Iran sending soldiers to fight in a military conflict to support the natives is not the same as an invasion of a sovereign nation.


Sooo Vietnam?

Except Iran is sending the Viet Cong into South Vietnam.

Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138873 posts
Posted on 6/20/25 at 9:09 am to
quote:

There was no choice, at that point. That was a conflict we could not win. Control had been lost and we had no way to get it back.
U.S. intelligence failed to grasp that Khomeini intended to establish a rigid Islamic theocracy, not merely play a symbolic or transitional role. Hell, the DS even viewed Khomeini’s anti-communism as a possible asset.

The expectation was for a moderate, post-Shah coalition—perhaps with secular nationalists, leftists, or reformist clerics. The DS believed that,at worst, Khomeini could be "managed." But their actual fantasy was he would simply play a spiritual or figurehead role, "like Gandhi." It was as predictably stupid an assessment as anything they ever made.

Regarding your "loss of control" assertion, that culminated only after Carter’s human rights agenda pressured the Shah to liberalize at exactly the moment his regime was most vulnerable. There was no clear U.S. plan to prevent a worse regime from filling the vacuum. In a nutshell, they simply did not have a clue as to WTF they were doing.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476619 posts
Posted on 6/20/25 at 9:09 am to
quote:

Sooo Vietnam?

Except Iran is sending the Viet Cong into South Vietnam.

Vietnam but the US sending troops to support the South from the North.
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
150324 posts
Posted on 6/20/25 at 9:25 am to
quote:

Iran sending soldiers to fight in a military conflict to support the natives is not the same as an invasion of a sovereign nation.
what about sending soldiers and arms to fire off the Yemen beaches at US flagged ships?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476619 posts
Posted on 6/20/25 at 9:41 am to
quote:

what about sending soldiers and arms to fire off the Yemen beaches at US flagged ships?

That could be described as an attack on US assets outside of the US, but what does that have to do with an invasion?
Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
35034 posts
Posted on 6/20/25 at 9:41 am to
Immaculate constellation
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138873 posts
Posted on 6/20/25 at 9:45 am to
quote:

Iran sending soldiers to fight in a military conflict to support the natives is not the same as an invasion of a sovereign nation.

So you are totally discounting de facto Iranian actions via Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476619 posts
Posted on 6/20/25 at 9:47 am to
quote:

So you are totally discounting de facto Iranian actions via Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis?

Discounting? No. They use these proxies to attack plenty.

I'm distinguishing state-backed terror/action and invasion of sovereign nations
Posted by Lynxrufus2012
Central Kentucky
Member since Mar 2020
19803 posts
Posted on 6/20/25 at 9:48 am to
Viet Nam
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138873 posts
Posted on 6/20/25 at 9:49 am to
quote:

but what does that have to do with an invasion?
“… unburdened by what has been”?

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476619 posts
Posted on 6/20/25 at 9:51 am to
Again, you give an example of a terrorist attack, not an invasion.

What territory did they occupy after October 7?

quote:

“… unburdened by what has been”?

No. Understands English
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
68360 posts
Posted on 6/20/25 at 9:54 am to
See, that’s the cool thing the media and MIC does. They call every attack in the middle east Iran-backed without ever showing proof. They have never shown the cards with respect to October 7, for instance.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138873 posts
Posted on 6/20/25 at 9:54 am to
quote:

Again, you give an example of a terrorist attack, not an invasion.



Roughly six THOUSAND (6,000) Hamas combatants invaded Israel on October 7, 2023.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138873 posts
Posted on 6/20/25 at 9:58 am to
quote:

They have never shown the cards with respect to October 7, for instance.
For instance ...

“We kiss the hands of those who planned the attack”
–– Ayatollah Khamenei, Iran’s Supreme Leader
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476619 posts
Posted on 6/20/25 at 9:58 am to
quote:

Roughly six THOUSAND (6,000) Hamas combatants invaded Israel on October 7, 2023.

They entered (using language of your picture) Israel to commit a horrible terrorist attack.

What territory did they occupy? What state apparatus did they seize and control?
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram