- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is anyone using strategy of waiting on the REAL VACCINE?
Posted on 8/6/21 at 9:01 am to JJJimmyJimJames
Posted on 8/6/21 at 9:01 am to JJJimmyJimJames
No. I am waiting on a disease that endangers me first... Before taking a vaccine that endangers me.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 9:02 am to MSWebfoot
Their issues have been from a raw material shortage. They're simply not ready yet for mass distribution.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 9:26 am to JJJimmyJimJames
It might be better for you to get Thorazine first.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 9:29 am to TerryDawg03
quote:
sn’t the J&J a more traditional vaccine rather than the mRNA ones from Pfizer and Moderna?
If the J&J were available locally I’d probably get it. Otherwise I’ll wait for Novavax.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 9:32 am to jonnyanony
quote:WRONG!
You're free to wait, but it absolutely is a vaccine and I really have no idea how this weird talking point started propagating.
A vaccine is a non-infectious agent that induces an immune response to a potential pathogen.
A vaccine is and always has been:
"A vaccine is a biological preparation that provides active acquired immunity to a particular infectious disease. A vaccine typically contains an agent that resembles a disease-causing microorganism and is often made from weakened or killed forms of the microbe, its toxins, or one of its surface proteins."
There is no dead virus or attenuated virus in this one.
The communist themselves said during ELECTION THEFT 2020 that no one should take a completely approved non-experimental product.
The "weird talking points" ARE ALL YOURS...
as is all the dishonesty in your support of totalitarianism control.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 9:33 am to Indefatigable
quote:
So you’ve never taken any vaccine?
A real FDA approved vaccine, yes. A non FDA approved gene therapy, no.
quote:
What recourse are you talking about?
That there is no recourse. The user takes on all risks and signs off on any ability to hold another party (designer or facilitator) accountable in criminal or civil courts.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 9:34 am to BigJim
quote:oh take some cyanide or a 9mm to the back of YOUR throat, dumbazz
It might be better for you to get Thorazine first.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 9:34 am to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
There is no dead virus or attenuated virus in this one.
You added a stipulation that is not part of the actual definition.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 9:35 am to jonnyanony
quote:This is the course of the stupid.. Avoid the original then declare some insignificant point as though it meant something.
You added a stipulation that is not part of the actual definition.
Original description stands, clown. Your childish "nah nah nah na na" not so much.
This post was edited on 8/6/21 at 9:38 am
Posted on 8/6/21 at 9:36 am to jonnyanony
quote:
A vaccine is a non-infectious agent that induces an immune response to a potential pathogen.
That’s a very recent and more generic definition than the traditional one. The definition was changed, recently, to bring mRNA shots under the umbrella.
The definition for a very long time has been:
quote:
A preparation of a weakened or killed pathogen, such as a bacterium or virus, or of a portion of the pathogen's structure that upon administration to an individual stimulates antibody production or cellular immunity against the pathogen but is incapable of causing severe infection.
This post was edited on 8/6/21 at 9:37 am
Posted on 8/6/21 at 9:40 am to TheHarahanian
quote:Yes.
That’s a very recent and more generic definition than the traditional one. The definition was changed, recently, to bring mRNA shots under the umbrella.
However that does not remove the ALSO original definition:
"A vaccine typically contains an agent that resembles a disease-causing microorganism and is often made from weakened or killed forms of the microbe, its toxins, or one of its surface proteins."
Posted on 8/6/21 at 9:44 am to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
This is the course of the stupid.. Avoid the original then declare some insignificant point as though it meant something.
Original description stands, clown. Your childish "nah nah nah na na" not so much.
You doin' ok?
Posted on 8/6/21 at 9:44 am to JJJimmyJimJames
"Typically" is in that definition, man.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 9:53 am to jonnyanony
quote:You are a childish dullard. Get a clue and cease with the "weird talking points".
"Typically" is in that definition, man.

Posted on 8/6/21 at 9:55 am to Gifman
Yeah, that is what I have read. It really does seem to be the best option with mandates coming so fast. I wish it had rolled out sooner.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 10:07 am to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:When did this happen?
experimental therapeutic shots everyone is threatened with
Posted on 8/6/21 at 10:09 am to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
You are a childish dullard. Get a clue and cease with the "weird talking points".
Sorry I interrupted your weird little attachment to something blatantly false.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 10:10 am to JJJimmyJimJames
There is no "real" vaxx coming.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 10:48 am to Indefatigable
quote:
So you’ve never taken any vaccine?
I've had maybe one flu vaccine between gradeschool and now. Won't do it again.
Certainly haven't ever taken a vaccine developed in a few months. A vaccine where the manufacturers are immune from any negative consequences they cause. That is the recourse I'm talking about.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 10:50 am to JJJimmyJimJames
I'm waiting for a traditional flu-like vaccine, which I will only get if I'm forced to by my employer.
Popular
Back to top
