Started By
Message

re: Iran targets Diego Garcia

Posted on 3/21/26 at 7:37 am to
Posted by Swamp Angel
West Georgia Chicken Farm Territory
Member since Jul 2004
10147 posts
Posted on 3/21/26 at 7:37 am to
quote:

So it is more accurate going east because its traveling with the Earth's rotation or it travels further going west because the earth is rotating opposite of its trajectory


It's not so much accuracy as it is capability. A missile launched in an easterly direction from near the equator has the advantage of a nearly 1,000 MPH boost provided by the rotation of the earth in that direction. A missile fired in a westerly direction has to overcome the effect of the earth's easterly rotation in order to reach it's target. Of course, that's just a quick explanation of it and the velocities mentioned would be expected at or near the equator. Moving further north or south from the equator would lessen the effect though.
Posted by RoyalWe
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2018
4898 posts
Posted on 3/21/26 at 7:43 am to
quote:

Obviously their capabilities are limited, but they are still a danger.
Indefatigable will be glad to know that there is a reason why we are still dropping bombs.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
16300 posts
Posted on 3/21/26 at 7:44 am to
Bravo, I was thinking backwards.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37137 posts
Posted on 3/21/26 at 7:45 am to
quote:

Should have let it hit since the UK was there and they are NATO. Use that to drag them in the war. Modern day Pearl Harbor.

Diego Garcia isn’t covered by the North Atlantic Treaty
This post was edited on 3/21/26 at 8:01 am
Posted by Aguga
Member since Aug 2021
3966 posts
Posted on 3/21/26 at 7:46 am to
If that’s true they are running out of options.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
49502 posts
Posted on 3/21/26 at 7:49 am to
quote:

It's not so much accuracy as it is capability.

the 'mission' also feeds into that.

IF you are interested in putting the object into orbit, then the easterly rotation of the earth definitely assists in getting to orbital velocity.

BUT if you are interested in hitting an object to the east on the surface, the easterly launch doesn't help much unless you are going orbital along the way. Your target is moving away from you just as fast as the speed you 'gain' by launching easterly.

You can hit a target that is west of launch site by just putting the thing high in the air and then slowing down to let the target rotate below you.

Much more complicated than that simple description - all based on the performance characteristics of the hardware involved.

edit - should have said 'out of the atmosphere' instead of 'high in air'
This post was edited on 3/21/26 at 7:52 am
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
16300 posts
Posted on 3/21/26 at 7:49 am to
quote:

If that’s true they are running out of options.


I think so too, I'm sure we ID'ed the launch site and they knew we would.

Now where were those ICBMs launched from?
Posted by RoyalWe
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2018
4898 posts
Posted on 3/21/26 at 7:50 am to
quote:

Firing a long-range missile in an easterly direction is MUCH easier than firing it a long distance in a westerly direction due to the earth's rotation.
I was curious as to how much easier it is to fire a rocket easterly and while significant, it's only like 5-7% of initial velocity advantage (i.e. ~15,000 mph rocket speed versus ~900 mph Earth rotation contribution depending on distance to equator.

Helpful, yes. Game-changing? No.

EDIT: I see SwampAngel updated his response before I wrote this. A westbound missile does not fight a spinning Earth like a headwind. The missile, launch pad, and atmosphere are already moving east together so there's no "wind resistance" from Earth's rotation. It's only an energy cost to cancel the initial ~800 mph velocity gap and then add westward velocity.
This post was edited on 3/21/26 at 7:55 am
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
22706 posts
Posted on 3/21/26 at 7:55 am to
quote:

We're being told that their military is defeated. How is it that they're able to keep firing off these missiles?


Imagine you are their military and you are bleeding out in a foxhole. You happen to find a few firecrackers to throw towards your superior enemy force before you bleed out.

You know when you toss those firecrackers, you will reveal your position to the enemy which will result in a tomahawk strike on your foxhole.

What is your move, boy?
Posted by Cuz413
Member since Nov 2007
11092 posts
Posted on 3/21/26 at 7:56 am to
quote:

The 2500 mi intermediate range missiles puts all of Europe within the terrorists reach.

Muh no imminent threat.


Sounds like Europe should have taken action.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
36569 posts
Posted on 3/21/26 at 7:58 am to
Dude just wants their military to somehow defeat or score significant blows against our military, for the mere purpose of having the opportunity to gloat about a Trump “misstep.” It’s quite a few of them around here, sadly enough.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
16300 posts
Posted on 3/21/26 at 7:59 am to
Damn, y'all are taking me back to physics. It's been too many moons to run with the big dogs. But I know at 1 click a 6.5prc will hit high going east and low going west

But I had my reasoning based on the earth moving under the projectile - completely ignoring the velocity difference.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37137 posts
Posted on 3/21/26 at 8:00 am to
quote:

Indefatigable will be glad to know that there is a reason why we are still dropping bombs.

Not a good one.
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
19927 posts
Posted on 3/21/26 at 8:02 am to
quote:

I don't think we intentionally lied. I think we've judged them prematurely.

Obviously their capabilities are limited, but they are still a danger.


You are so right "we" did judge them prematurely. When "we" said, oh we have been hearing for decades they are close to nuclear, oh they are not a threat, oh its just a middle east problem..........hmmmmmmm
Posted by RoyalWe
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2018
4898 posts
Posted on 3/21/26 at 8:04 am to
quote:

Not a good one.

In your informed assessment. I'll defer to Trump's assessment since he has more information and more closely represents my views.
Posted by TulsaSooner78
Member since Aug 2025
2710 posts
Posted on 3/21/26 at 8:10 am to
quote:

I’m being told that the IRGC “will rain down hail and defeat the US”


Well, this is the time of year for hail storms.
Posted by TulsaSooner78
Member since Aug 2025
2710 posts
Posted on 3/21/26 at 8:14 am to
quote:

Now where were those ICBMs launched from?


The launch would have been detected by a satellite, right?
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
19927 posts
Posted on 3/21/26 at 8:15 am to
quote:

Diego Garcia isn’t covered by the North Atlantic Treaty




"an attack on one is considered an attack on all". I would think dropping a bomb on a UK base would fulfill that definition. NATO is not defined by geographic territory.
Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
68769 posts
Posted on 3/21/26 at 8:15 am to
Always be skeptical of statements made in the middle of a controversial war…
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
40304 posts
Posted on 3/21/26 at 8:17 am to
Wait.


The earth is round and spins?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram