- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Iran Gets No Money
Posted on 6/19/26 at 11:51 am to AlterEd
Posted on 6/19/26 at 11:51 am to AlterEd
quote:Yes he was but he was about JFKjr. being his running mate in 2020. So of hendoes come back, Vance could get the boot. And, you are BoarEd. We all know.
BoarEd was banned from here long before Vance became VP. So, you are, in fact, lying
1
Posted on 6/19/26 at 11:53 am to Jake88
quote:
Yes he was
Thanks for confirming that you're lying.
Again, I ask, why lie about some shite that has nothing to do with the topic of this thread instead of participate in the discussion?
This post was edited on 6/19/26 at 11:54 am
Posted on 6/19/26 at 11:53 am to blueboy
quote:
And the retard roller coaster ride continues.
How is this affecting your daily life?
I know that sounds like an a-hole question.. but I feel we have more important things going on here... just wanted to edit this post to not sound like such a prick..
This post was edited on 6/19/26 at 1:14 pm
Posted on 6/19/26 at 11:53 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:don't you know the art of the deal!
Why even sign the MOU or brag that he resolved this?
Posted on 6/19/26 at 11:57 am to AlterEd
Good. Now finish the freaking job.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 12:00 pm to AlterEd
It's not a lie, I was extrapolating a silly belief you held to current times. It was brought up because you come up with so many mental gymnastics, rationalizations and fantasies that your opinions can only provide amusement.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 12:05 pm to Jake88
quote:
It's not a lie, I was extrapolating
You contradict yourself. Yes, you did lie.
And I ask for a third time. Why lie about things that have nothing to do with the topic at hand instead of just discussing the topic like a rational adult? Why are you derailing this thread? You have offered nothing of substance, which is typical of you.
This post was edited on 6/19/26 at 12:06 pm
Posted on 6/19/26 at 12:10 pm to AlterEd
I was making a joke that I was still out there waiting for JFKjr. Relax. I have offered background on your beliefs that provides context to some of your posts in this thread about a purposeful grand plan to split the regime. I'll quit "derailing" now.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 12:11 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Iran Gets No Money
I think that remains to be determined.
If you believe the Associated Press, below is the language from article 6 of the MOU.
AP LINK
“6. The United States of America undertakes with regional partners to develop a definitive mutually agreed plan with at least USD 300 billion for the reconstruction and economic development of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The mechanism for the implementation of this plan will be finalized as part of a final deal within 60 days. All required licenses, waivers and permissions needed for the relevant financial transactions will be granted by the United States of America.”
That stated, it’s just an MOU. It’s not a final agreement. Also, given the language above, if Iran does get the money, it’s not clear from where that money will be sourced.
We will find out more over the next couple of months.
This post was edited on 6/19/26 at 12:14 pm
Posted on 6/19/26 at 12:17 pm to Bunk Moreland
It is amazing that no matter what Trump does or says, there will be people like you that will piss and moan that it was some grand catastrophe.
This post was edited on 6/19/26 at 12:17 pm
Posted on 6/19/26 at 12:21 pm to BeeFense5
quote:
How does anyone take this poster serious with this
You can't
You just have to laugh and enjoy the ride
He spent more time telling you he wasn't going to tell you his thoughts than he could have just telling you his thoughts, mind you.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 12:22 pm to TigerAxeOK
quote:
I can distinctly recall posters on this board calling the Afghanistan withdrawal "an overwhelming success with unfortunate casualties".
Who? What thread?
Since you remember this "distinctly" and all
Posted on 6/19/26 at 12:22 pm to AlterEd
Trump is starting to get a little embarrassing, not gonna lie
Posted on 6/19/26 at 12:25 pm to i am dan
quote:
How is this affecting your daily life?
Paid for gas lately?
Not concerned about the global eocnomy?
Posted on 6/19/26 at 12:26 pm to AlterEd
Community noted!
Posted on 6/19/26 at 12:26 pm to AlterEd
quote:
I think you end up seeing the IRGC fight each other.
quote:Moderate leaning (pragmatists) and hardliners historically hold ideological differences within their leadership largely over their own economy and politics (IRGC is like a ‘country within a country). There is no real distinction like this within their fighting forces. The difficulty in eradicating the IRGC in the context of this war is by design. Their units are greatly decentralized and widespread, and commanders are given great autonomy.
I still think you see the IRGC split into two factions (moderate leaning vs zealots).
Your theory would require several difficult factors. One would be that the aggression of their shared enemy has not united them around their flag and they would actually fight each other. Another would be the logistics of coordinating similar ideologues into a cohesive fighting force. If this were to somehow happen, supply lines and the insane terrain would be a great hurdle. Then, a great number of clerics, parliament members, and other government divisions would have to coordinate support for their ‘team’ without being killed.
These same factors would apply to their supporting forces and reservists. To be noted, clerics are embedded within all their ranks to enforce ideology and strict adherence to command. And one of the greatest hurdles is that by design hardliners hold all the levers of powers within their individual divisions.
If this still were somehow possible, while Hezbollah is viewed as a proxy, IRGC commanders are embedded in their leadership and these are not moderates. They would certainly join in the fray. Rebel factions internally and externally could possibly create more chaos and additional rivals.
If ALL these things fell into place, it would likely not be a ‘couple of month’ resolution, but more likely a protracted civil war lasting years that could spill over into the surrounding Arab nations. The destruction of infrastructure and civilian casualties would be immense and create a humanitarian and migration crisis never before seen. I am only recalling these scenarios from various articles and books I have read over the years.
Personally, I am hoping that you are correct in your scenario and REALLY hoping and praying that I am wrong in mine. (Apologies for the wall of text BTW.)
Posted on 6/19/26 at 12:26 pm to AlterEd
But "muh pallets of cash!!!!" Waaaaaaahhhhh!!!!
Posted on 6/19/26 at 12:26 pm to GoblinGuide
quote:Teump’s padding his Nobel Peace price stats. “Ended 28 wars!”
This will mark the 28th time this year that Iran is finished.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 12:27 pm to AlterEd
quote:Im old enough to remember when regime change was going to happen in under three weeks.
I think we will be looking at a much different Iran in two months time.
Posted on 6/19/26 at 12:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Paid for gas lately?
Maybe you should up your fees.
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News