Started By
Message

re: Indians- WTH is their problem?& what would be their vision of this land w/o white man

Posted on 10/13/25 at 5:39 pm to
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
38783 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 5:39 pm to
White people are too diverse to recognize.


-NPR
Posted by Jaydeaux
Covington
Member since May 2005
19558 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 5:39 pm to
Hanging out hoping white dudes take mission trips to dig them a well.
Posted by deltadummy
Member since Mar 2025
1735 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 5:42 pm to


Gold!
Posted by BamaScoop
Panama City Beach, Florida
Member since May 2007
56742 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 5:44 pm to
It would be like the majority of Africa. I however think that there is nothing wrong with how the Indians lived their life.
Posted by DownSouthJukin
1x tRant Poster of the Millennium
Member since Jan 2014
31478 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 5:45 pm to
quote:

You should read the book 1491, about pre-European America. Their societies were far more advanced than you might think. By the time Europeans arrived en-mass most of their communities had been decimated by disease, so it was like arriving in medieval Europe right after a more intense version of the Black Death.


Didn’t most disease come post-Columbian contact? Smallpox, measles, etc.? Didn’t that have the greater affect on their populations? What pre-Columbian diseases were so devastating that they caused a total collapse of Native American cultures and societies to a point that they were more or less Paleolithic or Neolithic societies before Columbus arrived?

I’m honestly interested. Native American societies, as far as I have been educated, were practicing human sacrifice and bludgeoning each other with blunt objects and bows and arrows before Columbus arrived. Was there a Native American enlightenment period that we have not been educated upon? Why didn’t Western Europe totally lose its society and culture after bouts with the bubonic plague?
This post was edited on 10/13/25 at 5:51 pm
Posted by toratiger
susukino
Member since Aug 2008
3396 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 5:46 pm to
quote:

They had horses and that was it.



Their only beast of burden were dogs.


They never thought to capture a bison calf and try and tame it to be use to carry or ride.
Posted by cadillacattack
the ATL
Member since May 2020
9677 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 5:47 pm to
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
72009 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

What exactly were they going to do with “their land”?

"Their land" is a fallacy no matter who is laying claim. Land is only "yours" as long as you can keep and defend it.

Or, in today's time, as long as international support is on your side.
This post was edited on 10/13/25 at 5:51 pm
Posted by llfshoals
Member since Nov 2010
20617 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

I think the Indians would have us still living in teepees & skinning buffaloes for clothes.
Plains Indians, my ancestors were a bit more civilized. Don’t get me wrong, we’d happily kill anyone we felt like and steal anything in sight.

What’s mine is mine and what’s yours is negotiable isn’t new.

The trail of tears had an alternative, we didn’t take it and so misery and death ensued, as it always did throughout history. I’m not mad about it, we lost, and the losers get what they get.

My family chose the alternative. We accepted the white mans ways and aren’t in some shithole on a reservation. Go visit the Navajo one sometime to see what poor looks like.

So yes, this land is better off and a great nation emerged.
Posted by Tom288
Jacksonville
Member since Apr 2009
21336 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

Indians- WTH is their problem?& what would be their vision of this land w/o white man


I'm not concerned with the opinions of the losers. If their civilizations were so great, they'd still be free to be waging nonstop wars & committing countless atrocities upon one another to this day.
Posted by rltiger
Metairie
Member since Oct 2004
1977 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 6:00 pm to
North American natives were nowhere near advanced as they were in Central and South America. The abundance of natural resources in North America made survival a lot easier and allowed for nomadic hunter gatherer tribes to easily thrive without real advancements. There was no urgency to advance civilizations, just wander and survive. Millions of buffalo, deer, elk, etc.., corn, beans, squashes, berries, pawpaws. Ducks, turkeys, and other fowl.

Europeans made it even better.


Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
33006 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

They had horses and that was it.
They didn’t even have horses until the Spaniards brought them in the 1600’s.
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
53716 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

What exactly were they going to do with “their land”?


Dude . . . Casinos - one on every block.
Posted by Boomdaddy65201
BoCoMo
Member since Mar 2020
4145 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 6:10 pm to
quote:

Native Americans were still living in the stone age when Europeans arrived


From the end of the ice age until about 1525 they were walking everywhere they went. The entirety of their world was what they could load on their backs.

The great horse culture’s of the Comanche, Sioux, & Kiowa never takes place if not for stray or stolen Conquistador stock.
Posted by BoudinChicot
Member since Sep 2021
2205 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 6:11 pm to
This. Its kind of an apples to oranges comparison.

On a human advancement level, of course the world is better off with Euro America. Every single technological innovation we enjoy today is thanks to this legacy.

In terms of best system for survival, its not quite so clear cut. Those baws got to hunt and fish all day in the most bountiful environment imaginable. There's a reason why many white folks went 'native' and left the confines of civilization to go and live with the tribes. Obviously the inverse happened as well, with Indians that preferred to live in the white man's world.

Neither group is morally superior or inferior.
Posted by Bamanjo
Member since Sep 2025
219 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 6:11 pm to
Yes, but the first contact often occurred long before the mass migration of Europeans. After first contact the diseases spread rapidly, and by “second contact” the communities were devastated.

Also, responding to others, the Mayans did use copper for jewelry. They had writing and cities with estimated populations of 250k people. The Inca had stoned paved roads, canals, aqueducts.
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
17324 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 6:12 pm to
They would have died off years ago, those that didn’t die during Indian raid, massacres or diseases that their smoke pipes couldn’t cure
Posted by Jimbeaux
Member since Sep 2003
21387 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 6:15 pm to
The victim mentality is a big part of some native American cultures, or at least with the Indian equivalent of university professors. I’ve been wondering how far and wide this mentality spreads throughout Native Americans.

I don’t see it too much with the Chitimacha Tribe folks I know in South Louisiana, but my old high school buddy married a Native American lady in Washington state (I don’t know the tribe), and she’s full-on WOKE. Insufferable.
Posted by Bamanjo
Member since Sep 2025
219 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 6:15 pm to
But not to sugar coat, there was also human sacrifice in certain societies. Especially the Aztecs. As to why they didn’t domestic their native animals to the same extent, you could read a very famous book called Guns, Germs, and Steel. It offers several hypotheses which seem plausible to me.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78346 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 6:15 pm to
shite they would have just hunted and fished and smoked weed

thankfully we
showed up and introduced casinos and whiskey
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram