- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: In WW2 we firebombed millions and then cluster bombed the rescuers
Posted on 3/8/26 at 10:00 am to GeorgePaton
Posted on 3/8/26 at 10:00 am to GeorgePaton
quote:
"It is well that war is so terrible, or we should grow too fond of it" - General Robert E. Lee
And this is why we don't avoid ANY measure to shorten the combat time. Make it something nobody wants to endure - on either side - ever again.
0
Posted on 3/8/26 at 10:00 am to Jbird
Posted on 3/8/26 at 10:01 am to SlowFlowPro
That's nice SlowHijabPro
Posted on 3/8/26 at 10:01 am to udtiger
quote:
Didn't answer a single one of my questions, which are indicative of true total war.
I described your technique. I'm not playing the bait and switch game.
Once described, I said got it. You can play that game all you want. I don't.
Posted on 3/8/26 at 10:03 am to Kikicaca
quote:
I know you don't understand my points, you are not capable.
Your points ignore the inevitability of another 1979. I made that clear.
This theoretical modern/secular government would be great. The question is if it is possible (It's an incredibly low chance AND would require a very bloody, very long civil war to get there)
This post was edited on 3/8/26 at 10:04 am
Posted on 3/8/26 at 10:05 am to SlowFlowPro
Slow you just admitted he used Parliament voted the Shah out, that is a coup.
Because like the British system the Shah holds the rulership over the Parliament like the old English system.
Because like the British system the Shah holds the rulership over the Parliament like the old English system.
Posted on 3/8/26 at 10:06 am to tigger1
quote:
Slow you just admitted he used Parliament voted the Shah out
I did not.
quote:
Because like the British system the Shah holds the rulership over the Parliament like the old English system.
Is that the system in the UK today?
Does anyone describe that progress as a "coup"? No
This post was edited on 3/8/26 at 10:07 am
Posted on 3/8/26 at 10:06 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
Didn't answer a single one of my questions, which are indicative of true total war.
I described your technique. I'm not playing the bait and switch game.
Once described, I said got it. You can play that game all you want. I don't.
You're pathetic. Because people won't accept how you have framed an issue, any effort to explore it deeper is a trick/game/pivot. You must get your arse handed to you regularly in court.
Posted on 3/8/26 at 10:06 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Have you been in a coma since 2003?
We're all pretty sure you were born in a coma, and live in a coma.
Japan would have fought to the last man, had we not ended it the way we did and crushed their will.
Many more American soldiers would have died. What some fail to understand is that many of us would not be here today, had their fathers and grandfathers had to continue to fight the Japanese for a number of additional years.
Take your contrarian shite somewhere else this morning.
Posted on 3/8/26 at 10:07 am to udtiger
quote:Not SlowIrrelevantPro!
You're pathetic. Because people won't accept how you have framed an issue, any effort to explore it deeper is a trick/game/pivot. You must get your arse handed to you regularly in court.
Posted on 3/8/26 at 10:07 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
We started this
I am totally in uncomfortable awe of such an illogical, disturbingly baseless plea for more attention on a discussion board. I don't call in naive, because you know better.
Are you that starved for increasing your 'reply' total? that you would posit such an idiotic statement.
pfffft -
Posted on 3/8/26 at 10:08 am to tonydtigr
Japan's plan was to arm the children, women and old people and to keep attacking.
They were going to arm them with spears, as they did not have the weapons.
They were going to arm them with spears, as they did not have the weapons.
Posted on 3/8/26 at 10:09 am to udtiger
quote:
Because people won't accept how you have framed an issue
No. It's the hyper specificity that you chose to try to re-frame it while pivoting.
The irony in your statement is skrong.
quote:
any effort to explore it deeper is a trick/game/pivot.
Nope. Only tricks and pivots are tricks and pivots.
You're doing it again with this comment, FWIW.
quote:
You must get your arse handed to you regularly in court.
One of my more effective techniques is pointing out bad arguments by opposing counsel, actually
Posted on 3/8/26 at 10:10 am to SlowFlowPro
You are very slow the shah has far more power than the British system of today.
You cannot vote him out.
You cannot vote him out.
Posted on 3/8/26 at 10:10 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
We started this
bullshite counselor.THEY started it.Back in 1979. We are about to finish it
Posted on 3/8/26 at 10:10 am to tonydtigr
quote:
Japan would have fought to the last man, had we not ended it the way we did and crushed their will.
Many more American soldiers would have died. What some fail to understand is that many of us would not be here today, had their fathers and grandfathers had to continue to fight the Japanese for a number of additional years.
What does this have to do with the strategy of turning people against their government in Muslim/Middle Eastern shite holes?
Posted on 3/8/26 at 10:11 am to tigger1
quote:
You are very slow the shah has far more power than the British system of today.
*had
Just like the English king had
But unlike the English/British king today
The point is over your head
quote:
You cannot vote him out.
Was the British king "voted out"?
Posted on 3/8/26 at 10:12 am to antibarner
quote:
bullshite counselor.THEY started it.Back in 1979.
Which came first: The US-led coup in 1953 or the response to that coup in 1979?
Posted on 3/8/26 at 10:13 am to SlowFlowPro
In WW2 we firebombed millions and then cluster bombed the rescuers is the subject, you are the one leading many from fact to myths you have been taught about Iran and 1953.
Which as I post you have no clue on.
The US was going to back the Shah to stop the Soviet Union from invading Iran.
Which as I post you have no clue on.
The US was going to back the Shah to stop the Soviet Union from invading Iran.
This post was edited on 3/8/26 at 10:14 am
Posted on 3/8/26 at 10:14 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This theoretical modern/secular government would be great. The question is if it is possible (It's an incredibly low chance AND would require a very bloody, very long civil war to get there)
Whether it would take long or not (I don't believe it would BTW) today's Iran IS A threat the free world and America in particular. They need to be destroyed.
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News