- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/11/19 at 10:40 am to TigerCoon
So DiFi saying that there is no evidence of bias it was ok for what the FBI did?
Posted on 12/11/19 at 10:41 am to Oddibe
quote:
So DiFi saying that there is no evidence of bias it was ok for what the FBI did?
She seems to be avoiding the Clinesmith angle like it's the plague covered in herpes lesions.
Posted on 12/11/19 at 10:43 am to Bard
Of course now she's pivoting to the Whistleblower. Which has nothing to do with this hearing.
Posted on 12/11/19 at 10:43 am to Bard
She's pivoting to the Ukraine WB now? 
Nice dodge, Di!
Nice dodge, Di!
Posted on 12/11/19 at 10:44 am to Centinel
quote:
Of course now she's pivoting to the Whistleblower. Which has nothing to do with this hearing.
Just like the last IG hearing where all the Dems talked about was "kids in cages"
Posted on 12/11/19 at 10:44 am to Bard
How the hell could Horowitz find there was no bias, that is ridiculous. Once again Horowitz saying "nothing wrong, nothing to see here" even though there was and there is the Spin out by the MSM and Dems. Unreal. We can all see what happened here.
Posted on 12/11/19 at 10:44 am to Centinel
muh-st protect the whistle-blower.
frick the leaker.
frick the leaker.
Posted on 12/11/19 at 10:44 am to Amblin
quote:
How the hell could Horowitz find there was no bias, that is ridiculous.
He found no bias in the OPENING of the investigation.
Jesus people pay attention.
Posted on 12/11/19 at 10:44 am to Bunyan
Didn't see any evidence in "FBI files".
Posted on 12/11/19 at 10:46 am to Centinel
quote:
He found no bias in the OPENING of the investigation.
This is a lesson on word smithing and euphemisms.
Posted on 12/11/19 at 10:46 am to GumboPot
quote:
Didn't see any evidence in "FBI files".
Like they would be stupid enough to log the illegal activity.
Posted on 12/11/19 at 10:47 am to GumboPot
whoever wrote her script needs to be fired.
Posted on 12/11/19 at 10:47 am to GumboPot
quote:
This is a lesson on word smithing and euphemisms.
And attention to detail for the listener.
Posted on 12/11/19 at 10:47 am to Bard
quote:
re: In-Game Thread- Justice Department IG Testifies on FISA Abuse Allegations
Boy oh Boy!!! Hung Horowitz is really bring the pain to the whole dem narrative!!!
I knew he was "the one"!!!
Posted on 12/11/19 at 10:48 am to GumboPot
quote:
Didn't see any evidence in "FBI files".
Caught that too, eh? He made sure to say his group found nothing within their mandate (which did not include the White House, Brennan, etc).
Posted on 12/11/19 at 10:48 am to Oddibe
quote:
So DiFi saying that there is no evidence of bias it was ok for what the FBI did?
I guess she didn't hear HWitz state that none of the people he interviewed admitted to bias, but when asked directly by Graham, he said there was obvious bias. I guess she missed that part.
Posted on 12/11/19 at 10:48 am to Bard
quote:
She seems to be avoiding the Clinesmith angle like it's the plague covered in herpes lesions.
Here is the question that needs to be asked.
Sharyl Attkisson??????
?
@SharylAttkisson
There were such big issues 20 yrs ago that FBI had to institute "Woods Procedures" to fix them. But as we see, FBI didn't follow Woods w/Page wiretap. So what was the point? How many other wiretaps were same? If it's downplayed as "clerical error," then what's changed in 20 yrs? LINK …
@SharylAttkisson
Does anybody think an FBI lawyer who boldly falsified docs and misrepresented-- did it just once and got caught the first time? Did FBI agents who made 17 egregious mistakes on wiretaps, omitting exculpatory evidence, only do that once and get caught the first time? LINK …
This post was edited on 12/11/19 at 10:49 am
Posted on 12/11/19 at 10:49 am to Jbird
quote:
Sharyl Attkisson??????
?
@SharylAttkisson
There were such big issues 20 yrs ago that FBI had to institute "Woods Procedures" to fix them. But as we see, FBI didn't follow Woods w/Page wiretap. So what was the point? How many other wiretaps were same? If it's downplayed as "clerical error," then what's changed in 20 yrs? LINK …
@SharylAttkisson
Does anybody think an FBI lawyer who boldly falsified docs and misrepresented-- did it just once and got caught the first time? Did FBI agents who made 17 egregious mistakes on wiretaps, omitting exculpatory evidence, only do that once and get caught the first time?
Sharyl is always on the ball.
Posted on 12/11/19 at 10:52 am to Bard
all the dems look like they are about to die. jeez
Page 11 of 30
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News