- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/18/25 at 3:05 pm to Eurocat
Massive blow, blow is massive.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 3:29 pm to Eurocat
quote:
A panel of federal judges
I have never seen a panel of two federal district judges and one Fifth Circuit judge. Where is this procedure? Anyone know how the hell this kind of panel is constituted?
Posted on 11/18/25 at 3:35 pm to TBoy
I found the statute. I had never heard of this before.
quote:
28 U.S. Code § 2284 - Three-judge court; when required; composition; procedure
(a) A district court of three judges shall be convened when otherwise required by Act of Congress, or when an action is filed challenging the constitutionality of the apportionment of congressional districts or the apportionment of any statewide legislative body.
(b) In any action required to be heard and determined by a district court of three judges under subsection (a) of this section, the composition and procedure of the court shall be as follows:
(1) Upon the filing of a request for three judges, the judge to whom the request is presented shall, unless he determines that three judges are not required, immediately notify the chief judge of the circuit, who shall designate two other judges, at least one of whom shall be a circuit judge. The judges so designated, and the judge to whom the request was presented, shall serve as members of the court to hear and determine the action or proceeding.
(2) If the action is against a State, or officer or agency thereof, at least five days’ notice of hearing of the action shall be given by registered or certified mail to the Governor and attorney general of the State.
(3) A single judge may conduct all proceedings except the trial, and enter all orders permitted by the rules of civil procedure except as provided in this subsection. He may grant a temporary restraining order on a specific finding, based on evidence submitted, that specified irreparable damage will result if the order is not granted, which order, unless previously revoked by the district judge, shall remain in force only until the hearing and determination by the district court of three judges of an application for a preliminary injunction. A single judge shall not appoint a master, or order a reference, or hear and determine any application for a preliminary or permanent injunction or motion to vacate such an injunction, or enter judgment on the merits. Any action of a single judge may be reviewed by the full court at any time before final judgment.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 3:40 pm to DVNO
quote:Good God, do you not realize that Texas and California are in different federal Circuits?
will these same judged stop California since they voted to redraw district maps?
Posted on 11/18/25 at 3:47 pm to goatmilker
quote:I express no opinion regarding the merits of this particular case, but it would seem that you are unfamiliar with the federal Voting Rights Act.
Texican issue like all redistricting is a State issue.
This post was edited on 11/18/25 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 11/18/25 at 3:48 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
Judge will claim the Tex was racial and Cal was political...see how that works??
Posted on 11/18/25 at 3:48 pm to bbvdd
quote:That will depend upon whether any of those maps violate the VRA.
does that mean that the CA redistricting is thrown out as well? What about Illinois, MA, CT, NJ, etc???
Posted on 11/18/25 at 3:49 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
VRA is outdated. And now worthless.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 3:52 pm to Jbird
quote:And unconstitutional, in my opinion. But that and a nickel will not buy you any coffee at Starbucks.
VRA is outdated. And now worthless.
It is still the law.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 3:52 pm to Eurocat
lol stall ball by the activist judges
Posted on 11/18/25 at 3:55 pm to Eurocat
quote:
No I don't, but it is definitely a blow to his plans to get more GOP via redistricting in fact he doesn't hide that is what is trying to do.
You'll never be a woman. Just a fat man in a wig.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 3:56 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
Sadly true.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 3:58 pm to Eurocat
quote:
in fact he doesn't hide that is what is trying to do.
Why should he? so does
California
Illinois
Massachusetts
Hell even Louisiana was gerrymandered by Democrats. Look at the map.
None of them hid what they were doing.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 4:11 pm to back9Tiger
Posted on 11/18/25 at 4:14 pm to KCT
quote:
Don't you live in NYC? If so, did you vote for Mamdani?
Nope. I live in the state, but not the city. If I did live in the city I would have voted for Cuomo (holding my nose) or Sliwa (a publicity hound but better than the other two), Just like a nation cannot exist without strict borders, a city cannot exist without law and order.
This post was edited on 11/18/25 at 4:17 pm
Posted on 11/18/25 at 4:17 pm to CleverUserName
quote:
Meanwhile, a court just ruled that Mississippi was required to redraw districts to make some minority majority districts.
The SCOTUS will soon rule against districts drawn for racial purposes.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 4:18 pm to Timeoday
I agree with you.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 4:56 pm to Eurocat
It's ok for Democrats to gerrymander for overwhelming minority districts, do dare do it for Republicans
Posted on 11/18/25 at 4:59 pm to Eurocat
quote:.... all unspecified?
That effort, Brown said, began on July 7, with a letter from DOJ’s Civil Rights Division that was “challenging to unpack … because it contains so many factual, legal, and typographical errors.”
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News