- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I'm sorry I didn't believe you progressives before the election....
Posted on 10/12/17 at 8:16 pm to Sody Cracker
Posted on 10/12/17 at 8:16 pm to Sody Cracker
quote:When presenting facts is "hole digging," and it's coming from those who despite the SJWers; then clearly the mentality is far more pervasive than we ever thought. That's disturbing.
Your hole is deep enough - quit digging.
0
Posted on 10/12/17 at 8:19 pm to CptBengal
Excellent point
Time to hold them accountable
For raping women and raping due process and free speach rights
Time to hold them accountable
For raping women and raping due process and free speach rights
This post was edited on 10/12/17 at 8:20 pm
Posted on 10/12/17 at 8:20 pm to CptBengal
If these big named starlets were treated this way can you imagine all the wannabes that came through the offices of these shmucks and what they had to do with them only to NOT get hired?
Posted on 10/12/17 at 8:24 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
buckeye_vol
Been a hard working "non partisan" running interference in multiple threads the last few days.
ROFLMAO
It's times like these when our resident non partisan contrarians show us who they really are.
ROFLMAO
Posted on 10/12/17 at 8:28 pm to buckeye_vol
Hollywood Liberals are Champions of Women’s Rights, except when they are complicit & protect rape/pedo’s to further their career.
Posted on 10/12/17 at 8:33 pm to ShortyRob
quote:Non-partisan? I hope Weinstein, and all left-wing hacks in Hollywood and beyond are roasted for this (and more than that for Weinstein).
Been a hard working "non partisan" running interference in multiple threads the last few days.
I hope NBC is roasted and people are fired for trying to stop the story.
All I'm saying is that the 2004 NYT's story was NOT THE SAME STORY, and the reporter herself couldn't even make a strong case for the evidence firm this different story.
Her primary argument that this guy was procuring prostitutes was that he was unqualified for that job and third party reports. No paper trial; no money trail; not a single person who was directly involved, either helping procure the escorts and not even the efforts themselves. I'm not a journalist, let alone investigating it like she was, and I can think of a number of sources of evidence that could have built a stronger case than anything she had.
quote:seriously. I'm criticizing Weinstein, the leftist Hollywood enabling of him, NBC for trying to stop this story, but because I defend against lies regarding the 2004 NYT's story WITH FACTS, I'm a contrarian showing who I really am?
It's times like these when our resident non partisan contrarians show us who they really are.
Well what or who am I? I expected cptbengal to resort to this, but I expected you would at least address the facts of my argument instead of acting just like him, just with nicer insults.
This post was edited on 10/12/17 at 8:39 pm
Posted on 10/12/17 at 8:35 pm to el Gaucho
quote:
10/5 women get raped on college campuses
We used to just call those girls sluts...
Posted on 10/12/17 at 8:40 pm to CptBengal
Liberalism is a fricking disease. Anyone defending this piece of shite and his enablers needs to be sterilized so they can't fricking reproduce. The Liberal Trash has polluted the gene pool enough as it is.
Posted on 10/12/17 at 8:49 pm to buckeye_vol
Worship at the altar of TPA. He could very well be correct.
I got short AMZN right before 7PM CST. Dark pool. I had seriously considered a SSF, but too much margin involved, and One Chicago is very difficult, probably impossible to get to overnight. Also a minimum 5 contract bid, so that's 20% in margin, or a lot of money. That's also playing with a bunch of institutions essentially financing and hedging borrowed and lent securities. I found one lone open bid at 993 at 8:30ish. Dangerous play. I hope TPA is correct. Otherwise, not good for me.
I got short AMZN right before 7PM CST. Dark pool. I had seriously considered a SSF, but too much margin involved, and One Chicago is very difficult, probably impossible to get to overnight. Also a minimum 5 contract bid, so that's 20% in margin, or a lot of money. That's also playing with a bunch of institutions essentially financing and hedging borrowed and lent securities. I found one lone open bid at 993 at 8:30ish. Dangerous play. I hope TPA is correct. Otherwise, not good for me.
Posted on 10/12/17 at 9:08 pm to Iowa Golfer
quote:You know. I first thought you are just either a really odd or really dumb poster because your posts often made know sense within context of the topic (like this one) or who you were talking to.
Worship at the altar of TPA. He could very well be correct.
I got short AMZN right before 7PM CST. Dark pool. I had seriously considered a SSF, but too much margin involved, and One Chicago is very difficult, probably impossible to get to overnight. Also a minimum 5 contract bid, so that's 20% in margin, or a lot of money. That's also playing with a bunch of institutions essentially financing and hedging borrowed and lent securities. I found one lone open bid at 993 at 8:30ish. Dangerous play. I hope TPA is correct. Otherwise, not good for me.
But now I think you just may be a smart guy who has trouble navigating the basic technology that is second nature to most of us. And I'm also guessing that it doesn't come natural because you didn't grow up in it. So maybe you're, what, 60+?
Posted on 10/12/17 at 9:10 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
buckeye_vol
haha why do you try with these dudes so hard
half of them can't fricking read, the other half just hate you
Posted on 10/12/17 at 9:10 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
You know. I first thought you are just either a really odd or really dumb poster because your posts often made know sense within context of the topic (like this one) or who you were talking to.
His post makes compete sense of you invest money beyond the basic markets
fricking rape apologist
Posted on 10/12/17 at 9:14 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
The sat in a poorly researched story that was mostly about an executive procuring escorts for Weinstein in Europe. And it was based on circumstantial evidence, at best
I feel sorry for you.
Posted on 10/12/17 at 9:16 pm to buckeye_vol
Ugly crawfishing and splitting hairs. Dude, this was just terrible behavior that went on for decades. The protection of this shite goes right up to the top of the Democratic Party and their biggest financial supporters. It’s Bill Clinton all over again.
There’s absolutely no defense. None. I hope that you are blessed with daughters one day.
I thought that you were a little better than this. I don’t agree with you most of the time but you raise salient points and debate fairly intelligently. But this is a disgusting spear to throw yourself upon.
You know what this bastard did. Arguing who reported what and when is just a pathetic tactic.
Just stop. You are now defending yourself instead of, rightfully, enthusiastically declaring this man’s abhorrent behavior as disgusting. Regardless of which fricking reporter reporter broke a whore story or a rape story or when. This has been an open secret. For years.
The Democratic Party protected this man and the Hollywood elite gave him their highest awards, all the while, knowing that he was a rapist.
There’s absolutely no defense. None. I hope that you are blessed with daughters one day.
I thought that you were a little better than this. I don’t agree with you most of the time but you raise salient points and debate fairly intelligently. But this is a disgusting spear to throw yourself upon.
You know what this bastard did. Arguing who reported what and when is just a pathetic tactic.
Just stop. You are now defending yourself instead of, rightfully, enthusiastically declaring this man’s abhorrent behavior as disgusting. Regardless of which fricking reporter reporter broke a whore story or a rape story or when. This has been an open secret. For years.
The Democratic Party protected this man and the Hollywood elite gave him their highest awards, all the while, knowing that he was a rapist.
Posted on 10/12/17 at 9:18 pm to BRgetthenet
quote:
I’ve already quit watching the Golf Channel.
and the Weather Channel except when absolutely necessary.
Posted on 10/12/17 at 9:18 pm to Pettifogger
I dont hate him. I just think he's more insane than most of the rest of us.
Posted on 10/12/17 at 9:21 pm to buckeye_vol
No No.
ThinePreparedAni could be correct. And I'm short AMZN. I just thought you would appreciate how I did it since you're in finance. Or graduated from the LSU Graduate School of Banking. Or something. And once upon a time you told me I had no idea about a carry trade, and iosh knew more about economics than I do. Which he probably does. But I'm betting he isn't shorting shares on dark pools. Pretty good for a pig farmer from Iowa.
I bet this is all connected to the FBI coverup in Las Vegas. I'll ask next time I play traditional, big board baccarat at the Mansion.
Go Cubbie Go!
ThinePreparedAni could be correct. And I'm short AMZN. I just thought you would appreciate how I did it since you're in finance. Or graduated from the LSU Graduate School of Banking. Or something. And once upon a time you told me I had no idea about a carry trade, and iosh knew more about economics than I do. Which he probably does. But I'm betting he isn't shorting shares on dark pools. Pretty good for a pig farmer from Iowa.
I bet this is all connected to the FBI coverup in Las Vegas. I'll ask next time I play traditional, big board baccarat at the Mansion.
Go Cubbie Go!
Posted on 10/12/17 at 9:26 pm to LSU Patrick
quote:What was the focus of the 2004 story? In addition, what was the evidence and how strong was the evidence?
I feel sorry for you.
And then, how does those relate to the current story? Specifically what were the connections, and how strong were the connections?
You all seem so sure I'm wrong, or worse, yet nobody has addressed a single point I've made about the 2004 story, nor have they even provided support at all.
There had been a lot of insults though. And if people are so confident that I'm wrong to resort to insults, then assuredly they have the evidence and argument to justify it. Right?
Posted on 10/12/17 at 9:28 pm to buckeye_vol
You keep trying to spin out of this and seem "non partisan
It's a joke. Just like Polly, another failed persona.
It's a joke. Just like Polly, another failed persona.
Posted on 10/12/17 at 9:33 pm to Iowa Golfer
quote:I'm not in finance, just like I wasn't in finance last time you said I was in finance.
I just thought you would appreciate how I did it since you're in finance.
quote:I've never discussed a carry trade in my entire life. In fact, I had to look it up to know what it means, but or does make a lot of sense.
And once upon a time you told me I had no idea about a carry trade,
quote:Iosh is a sharp guy, and knows a lot about ecomics, but I've never even thought of him as an economics expert, let alone argued with you about it.
and iosh knew more about economics than I do.
quote:OK. I take back my post. We've had some good discussions lately, and you hadn't confused me with anyone on months. So that's why I said you probably just had difficulty with the technology. But now we're back to an odd mix up again. I don't get it.
I bet this is all connected to the FBI coverup in Las Vegas. I'll ask next time I play traditional, big board baccarat at the Mansion.
Page 2 of 4
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News