- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I'm sorry I didn't believe you progressives before the election....
Posted on 10/12/17 at 7:32 pm
Posted on 10/12/17 at 7:32 pm
It seems there is a rape culture with white males c9vering it up and burying the stories.
I didn't understand that you meant it was the liberal elites who were raping women and children.
You should have been more specific, it wasn't intuitive considering you keep voting for these criminals
I didn't understand that you meant it was the liberal elites who were raping women and children.
You should have been more specific, it wasn't intuitive considering you keep voting for these criminals
9
Posted on 10/12/17 at 7:33 pm to CptBengal
10/5 women get raped on college campuses
Posted on 10/12/17 at 7:36 pm to CptBengal
Well thankfully those leftist rags like the New York Times and the New Yorker brought it to light. And thankfully those leftist hacks like Jake Tapper and Rachel Maddow (she usually is though) helped bring NBC's attempt to hide the truth to light as well.
This post was edited on 10/12/17 at 7:37 pm
Posted on 10/12/17 at 7:39 pm to buckeye_vol
I mean Bill O'Reilly is as right wing as it gets.........
Posted on 10/12/17 at 7:39 pm to buckeye_vol
You just gave NYT credit for the story they sat on for 13 years
Posted on 10/12/17 at 7:41 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
Well thankfully those leftist rags like the New York Times and the New Yorker brought it to light. And thankfully those leftist hacks like Jake Tapper and Rachel Maddow (she usually is though) helped bring NBC's attempt to hide the truth to light as well
The new York times killed this story in 2004 and 2007. Tapper isn't a hack. And nbc refused to run this story, which was lead by an nbc reporter.
This is a cover up man. I know you love your tribe, but they covered for a rapist. For years.
This post was edited on 10/12/17 at 7:42 pm
Posted on 10/12/17 at 7:41 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
Well thankfully those leftist rags like the New York Times and the New Yorker brought it to light.
How many women got raped in those 13 years?
frick you rape apologist
Posted on 10/12/17 at 7:42 pm to buckeye_vol
I’d like a list of things NBC is responsible for producing so I can boycott them from here on.
I’ve already quit watching the Golf Channel.
I’ve already quit watching the Golf Channel.
Posted on 10/12/17 at 7:42 pm to LSUTIGER in TEXAS
quote:The sat in a poorly researched story that was mostly about an executive procuring escorts for Weinstein in Europe. And it was based on circumstantial evidence, at best.
You just gave NYT credit for the story they sat on for 13 years
I don't care if Weinstein pays for sex, but I so care if he's forcing and coercing women into sex. That's not the same story at all.
Posted on 10/12/17 at 7:45 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
The sat in a poorly researched story that was mostly about an executive procuring escorts for Weinstein in Europe. And it was based on circumstantial evidence, at best.
I don't care if Weinstein pays for sex, but I so care if he's forcing and coercing women into sex. That's not the same story at all.
This is a complete lie. An nbc had confessions of women on tape, and still wouldn't publish it. Damn, you libs really stick together, even actual rape doesn't get you to call each other out. Amazing
Posted on 10/12/17 at 7:45 pm to CptBengal
quote:Again. They were not the same story. It was likely researched and largely about escorts.
How many women got raped in those 13 years?
frick you rape apologist
Posted on 10/12/17 at 7:46 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
Again. They were not the same story. It was likely researched and largely about escorts.
This is a lie. They had the story.
Posted on 10/12/17 at 7:49 pm to FutureRATeammember
quote:Well I'm not talking about NBC in the post you're quoting. NBC sat (or tried to squash) THIS story, about Weinstein abusing women.
This is a complete lie. An nbc had confessions of women on tape, and still wouldn't publish it. Damn, you libs really stick together, even actual rape doesn't get you to call each other out. Amazing
The 2004 NYT's story was about an executive in Italy procuring escorts, and the evidence was essentially rumors and the fact that he was unqualified to be an executive. That's not strong evidence for the escort story, but even then, that's not the same story.
This post was edited on 10/12/17 at 7:52 pm
Posted on 10/12/17 at 7:51 pm to CptBengal
quote:I don't know, but the pertinent question is, how many Russian escorts got paid to have sex with him?
How many women got raped in those 13 years?
quote:Pointing out the difference between records and rape makes me a rape apologist? I didn't take you for a feminist.
frick you rape apologist
Posted on 10/12/17 at 7:52 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
The 2004 NYT's story was about an executive in Italy procuring escorts, and the evidence was essentially rumors and the fact that he was unqualified to be an executive. That's not strong evidence for the escort story, but even then, that's not the same story.
This is a lie. They had the story. They wouldn't run it. Man, this is sick. Why cover for them? What's it to you? Rape enabling is bad, no matter which party does it. In this case democrats were protecting democrats. Just call it for what it is. It's not like the other side won't pull some sleazy crap soon.
Posted on 10/12/17 at 8:02 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
I don't know, but the pertinent question is, how many Russian escorts
Collusion?
Posted on 10/12/17 at 8:06 pm to CptBengal
Prog Filth
Posted on 10/12/17 at 8:07 pm to FutureRATeammember
quote:No they didn't.
This is a lie. They had the story. They wouldn't run it.
quote:I'm not covering for them. I'm just stating the facts as presented from the reporter (Sharon Waxman), whose facts didn't support what she was trying to imply. It's not the same story, and if she had followed the one lead she had that would had that is in line with the story (a victim who wouldn't go on record and had signed an NDA) maybe she would have gotten the story. Instead she focused on escorts.
Man, this is sick. Why cover for them? What's it to you?
They paid for her to go after Weinstein. Yet when she can back with a story about an executive procuring escorts, with no hard evidence of even that, they didn't publish the escort part of the story. Why would they pay for her to go after him? Could it be that they weren't going to risk a purely researched story about escorts, which isn't that big of a deal anyways?
But nope. Instead you ignore those FACTS, and when I present the FACTS, I'm accused of being a rape enabler and rape apologist.
When facts result in accusations of rape enabling, I expect that to he coming from an SJWer feminist. Why act like them?
This post was edited on 10/12/17 at 8:14 pm
Posted on 10/12/17 at 8:10 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
buckeye_vol
Your hole is deep enough - quit digging.
Posted on 10/12/17 at 8:13 pm to el Gaucho
10/10 that major in liberal arts
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News