- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I’ll say it again… Kari Lake is a trash candidate
Posted on 11/8/24 at 8:23 am to Homesick Tiger
Posted on 11/8/24 at 8:23 am to Homesick Tiger
quote:
That is a result, not a reason. I asked you for reasons of your disdain for her.
Her losing is the reason!
Her losing means there’s 1 less R senate seat! It’s the reason there’s not an R governor fixing their voting laws!
1
Posted on 11/8/24 at 8:24 am to themunch
quote:
She lost?
Not yet.
quote:
the votes are in?
According to the AP over a half a million ballots are still left to count in Maricopa County alone and apparently the-left-to-be-counted votes in Maricopa County are from KL leaning precincts.
Posted on 11/8/24 at 8:25 am to Undertow
quote:
You’re going to have to do better than that. That’s not a real reason. Start with what she’s wrong about or what specific missteps she may have made.
"She loses every time, even when she clearly should win" is a valid reason. Actual results are the most valid reason. She doesn't have any entitlement to be nominated unless someone can prove she shouldn't be.
Posted on 11/8/24 at 8:25 am to Tridentds
quote:
If she is so toxic how is she getting roughly 50% of the vote? Sounds like your personal dislike of her is clouding your judgement to be honest.
She’s toxic, because she’s not getting 52% of the vote like Trump. It means there’s 2% of people who have REPEATEDLY signaled they will not vote for her, these 2% of people are apparently the critical tipping point of whether she can win or lose.
This is simple stuff guys
Posted on 11/8/24 at 8:26 am to RogerTheShrubber
So dis tulsi she toxic too
Posted on 11/8/24 at 8:27 am to ole man
quote:
So dis tulsi she toxic too
A socialist.
Posted on 11/8/24 at 8:28 am to OBReb6
quote:
So your argument is the cheat machine is more threatened by lake than Trump
Senators are there for six years not four and once they get in they almost never lose re-election. If Lake were to get in she could easily be there for 12 to 18 years or more. Being a senator would also give her another launch pad to run for governor again at some point.
Posted on 11/8/24 at 8:28 am to MintBerry Crunch
And it sounds like you are a Trash Poster
Posted on 11/8/24 at 8:29 am to OBReb6
quote:
Her losing is the reason!
Once again, what is the reason for the result of her losing?
Posted on 11/8/24 at 8:30 am to OBReb6
quote:
Because the voters of Arizona keep rejecting her. It is extremely simple
You mean the voting machines
Posted on 11/8/24 at 8:31 am to Seldom Seen
quote:
Senators are there for six years not four and once they get in they almost never lose re-election. If Lake were to get in she could easily be there for 12 to 18 years or more. Being a senator would also give her another launch pad to run for governor again at some point.
So you’re saying a bunch of fake ballots were filled out that voted against Lake but FOR Trump?
ETA sorry I had my wording backwards at first
This post was edited on 11/8/24 at 8:36 am
Posted on 11/8/24 at 8:31 am to MintBerry Crunch
quote:
She’s toxic in Arizona and needs to be blocked from running again
^^^closet leftist who will say white men have problems with strong women, then trashes a strong woman.
Posted on 11/8/24 at 8:31 am to MintBerry Crunch
She lost by 17,000 votes in the Gov race full of irregularities. She’s either going to win or lose by about as many votes in the Senate race. That doesn’t signify trash candidate. A trash candidate would be getting pummeled.
Posted on 11/8/24 at 8:32 am to LaMigra
quote:
You mean the voting machines
Answer this question I posted on the first page
quote:
And I don’t want to hear muh chear arguments or claims. It makes no sense that Trump can win a state, and then the Republican senate nominee doesn’t. Even if there was a bunch of cheating, the only reason the vote share isn’t 1:1 is because a huge number of the LEGITIMATE ballots split the ticket. A theoretical fake ballot would OBVIOUSLY vote against both Trump and Lake.
Posted on 11/8/24 at 8:33 am to Homesick Tiger
quote:
Once again, what is the reason for the result of her losing?
She's not good at running in the general for statewide office.
Let me turn the question around - why is Kari Lake having trouble beating one of the most liberal members of congress, an open border a-hole, in a border state that's less than 30% Dem? Oh, and in an election cycle where 65% of voters passed a proposition to compel state-level immigration enforcement.
This post was edited on 11/8/24 at 8:38 am
Posted on 11/8/24 at 8:35 am to The Boat
quote:
She lost by 17,000 votes in the Gov race full of irregularities. She’s either going to win or lose by about as many votes in the Senate race. That doesn’t signify trash candidate. A trash candidate would be getting pummeled.
It signals that she isn’t good enough. This is an election that the entire electorate was motivated to go right, and she’s still struggling.
I’m not claiming she’s trash, I’m claiming she isn’t good enough for Arizona to win. It’s been proven twice. If she ends up winning I’ll be happy, but it sucks that it has to be this close. If she loses it will be abundantly clear that she needs to move on.
Posted on 11/8/24 at 8:35 am to The Boat
quote:
She lost by 17,000 votes in the Gov race full of irregularities. She’s either going to win or lose by about as many votes in the Senate race. That doesn’t signify trash candidate. A trash candidate would be getting pummeled.
Well, you forgot to mention that before Lake's opponent there had been only one Democrat since 1982 to win the governor's race. So "losing by 17K votes" really isn't the best metric to make this judgment on.
Posted on 11/8/24 at 8:35 am to MintBerry Crunch
Shed be a fantastic Senator
Posted on 11/8/24 at 8:36 am to OBReb6
Yes that is what I am saying.
I am telling what happened in an actual election.
I do not think for a moment the elections favored a R governor and then pissed on the president R and senate R.
I am telling what happened in an actual election.
I do not think for a moment the elections favored a R governor and then pissed on the president R and senate R.
This post was edited on 11/8/24 at 8:39 am
Posted on 11/8/24 at 8:37 am to themunch
That doesn’t make a lot of sense. In fact it makes no sense
This post was edited on 11/8/24 at 8:39 am
Page 3 of 7
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News