- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If you were performing at a high level
Posted on 2/23/25 at 8:54 am to The Torch
Posted on 2/23/25 at 8:54 am to The Torch
quote:
It shouldn't take someone five minutes to list five bullet points showing what they did for the week. It's called accountability
I agree. Do you feel someone should be removed if they are on leave and unaware the requirement exists?
2
Posted on 2/23/25 at 8:56 am to RogerTheShrubber
You’re a boot licker with no self-respect. I set boundaries that my employer respects because they need me more than I need them.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 8:58 am to 4cubbies
quote:
You’re a boot licker with no self-respect
Generally how low level employees feel about those actually taking pride in their output. I have never heard of a management job that doesnt require some out of schedule attention. Youre a worker, not management.
Youre a walking stereotype and will be confined to scale wages the rest of your life.
quote:
I set boundaries that my employer respects because they need me more than I need them.
Youre simply an hourly worker, not a professional.
This post was edited on 2/23/25 at 9:02 am
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:00 am to STEVED00
quote:
I agree. Do you feel someone should be removed if they are on leave and unaware the requirement exists?
Where did this “on leave” talking point that so many seem to be parroting come from? Is there any indication this even applies to anyone on leave? It would seem rather nonsensical in that context.
Was this really one of DU’s big marching order gotchas?
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:01 am to STEVED00
quote:
Do you feel someone should be removed if they are on leave
Shouldn't their manager know when they are on leave? They should also have an out-of-office auto-reply.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:03 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Where did this “on leave” talking point that so many seem to be parroting come from?
Probably from the same mill that "Muh Accountability" came from.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:03 am to TDTOM
quote:
Do you feel someone should be removed if they are on leave
Shouldn't their manager know when they are on leave?
I always have auto replies when I am out.
It seems some of these folks are still in the 20th century.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:05 am to TDTOM
quote:
Shouldn't their manager know when they are on leave? They should also have an out-of-office auto-reply.
This is one of the funniest talking points thrown out by the left to try and defend unproductive workers.
If the employee did not inform a manager or, at minimum, put an OOO reply, then that tells you all you need to know about the "production" of that employee.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:08 am to The Torch
quote:
Everyone in my department emails our supervisor daily with what we did for the day.
I've never had a management, or upper position that didnt require some attention off schedule or some kind of status report required.
Many of these people are just showing they want status, but they dont want the responsibility that comes with that status.
If you supervise people, you will always have to deal with off hours tasks. Every single time.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:10 am to RogerTheShrubber
continue to devote your life to your job while somehow simultaneously posting on here for 99.9% of every work day. I’m just a low level employee who doesn’t have time to spend all day at work posting here. Maybe I’ll be as important and busy as you one day.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:20 am to EZE Tiger Fan
quote:
Shouldn't their manager know when they are on leave?
quote:If the manager didn't know his employee was on leave then we just saved another hirer salary.
This is one of the funniest talking points thrown out by the left to try and defend unproductive workers.
If the employee did not inform a manager or, at minimum, put an OOO reply, then that tells you all you need to know about the "production" of that employee
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:22 am to NineLineBind
wtf are you guys talking about? I must have missed something.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:23 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The micromanager wasting their time with the request is still around, or at least I presumed that was the point of the exercise.
Project management is not micromanagement.
It is a normal function if management to know the status of what the employees who report to them are supposed to be working on.
This post was edited on 2/23/25 at 9:24 am
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:24 am to imjustafatkid
Do project managers typically have no clue what any of their employees do all day?
This post was edited on 2/23/25 at 9:30 am
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:27 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
Project management is not micromanagement.
Project management isn't HR sending out company-wide emails like this.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:35 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Project management isn't HR sending out company-wide emails like this.
It certainly can be.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:35 am to 4cubbies
quote:
continue to devote your life to your job
What a drama queen.
You would make a terrible manager. Your limit is worker drone.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:36 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Do project managers typically have no clue what any of their employees do all day?
Aha! Now we're getting into how are the managers providing value. Good thing they aren't immune.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:47 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
It certainly can be.
It could also be zero communication.
"It can be terrible" isn't a great point.
Page 9 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News