Started By
Message

re: If you don’t support the Epstein files and participants brought to light…

Posted on 9/6/25 at 9:00 pm to
Posted by Jtomka
Member since Sep 2022
351 posts
Posted on 9/6/25 at 9:00 pm to
Then when you finally get your hands on the Epstein files how do you plan to imprison the people you read about? There seems to be a huge gap in there.
1) You get the files
2)
3)
.
.
.
N) Prison
How do you plan to get there?
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 9/6/25 at 9:02 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/1/26 at 1:24 pm
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
27182 posts
Posted on 9/6/25 at 9:03 pm to
quote:

Then when you finally get your hands on the Epstein files how do you plan to imprison the people you read about? There seems to be a huge gap in there.
1) You get the files
2)
3)
.
.
.
N) Prison
How do you plan to get there?


What are you talking about? I posted basically that names on a piece of paper or spreadsheet is not evidence of anything. Video used to blackmail would be very strong evidence.
Posted by Plx1776
Member since Oct 2017
18619 posts
Posted on 9/6/25 at 9:12 pm to
You should support all transparency. At same time, you should question things presented, and not take it as absolute fact.

Epstein... regarding a national narrative,
was hidden away by the msm for several years, and was only talked about after Epstein was arrested that last time. Even after msm started barely talking about it, the government kept quiet, and refused to release client lists.

Epstein. It quickly became a narrative that was only brought up as a form of political motivation. Republicans would demand it released while implying Democrats were on list. Democrats would demand it released while implying Republicans were on the list. Any Intel that is politically motivated can easily be manipulated. I want all forms of transparency.. but I won't trust everything released.
Posted by ThuperThumpin
Member since Dec 2013
9361 posts
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:14 pm to
quote:

They released 32,000+ files a couple of days ago and guess what? It's a God Damn nothing burger just like the JFK Files, MLK files and all of the other shite they have released and once again it's a nothing burger


Those were old documents, lightly redacted and recycled for the public

.
quote:

WHAT THE frick ELSE DO YOU WANT THEM TO DO?


How about the relaease of 300.plus interview notes with over 40 witness interviews from the original Epstein indictment, the full unredeacted flight logs, the surveillance tapes from all of Epstein's residence,the phone logs, the contact books, Maxwells dispatch notes of.the girls she sent to various John's, the draft 54 count indictment in Miami that got buried.
Posted by HooDooWitch
TD Bronze member
Member since Sep 2009
11301 posts
Posted on 9/6/25 at 11:21 pm to
Release the files, compare the list to the accusers list, and let the courts wash it out.

All the promises made and then coming up with excuses to no fulfill the promise once elected is bullshite!

Everyone is getting played for fools and the victims don't get their day in court?
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65819 posts
Posted on 9/6/25 at 11:29 pm to
quote:

So what we fearing here?


I'm not fearing anything. I'm pretty sure we have seen everything of consequence.

What are you fearing?
Posted by CIGAR_cigarillo
Miami
Member since Oct 2024
985 posts
Posted on 9/7/25 at 3:10 am to
So, Biden is a pedophile protector.
Posted by Blueghost1978
Metairie, LA
Member since Jan 2024
911 posts
Posted on 9/7/25 at 3:35 am to
I haven’t heard anyone claim that they’re against the victims providing the names? Maxwell even said that there wasn’t a list and she has a lot to gain. Obviously then the only way to truly know is to hear from the victims themselves. I haven’t heard of people saying don’t let them talk? Weird post.
Posted by Tunasntigers92
The Boot
Member since Sep 2014
28109 posts
Posted on 9/7/25 at 3:46 am to
quote:

I haven’t heard anyone claim that they’re against the victims providing the names? Maxwell even said that there wasn’t a list


Posted by CIGAR_cigarillo
Miami
Member since Oct 2024
985 posts
Posted on 9/7/25 at 4:23 am to
Reddit fggots are funny
Posted by CIGAR_cigarillo
Miami
Member since Oct 2024
985 posts
Posted on 9/7/25 at 4:27 am to
So, after four years of Biden, you only just now want this?

Then you support protecting pedos and child sex traffickers.

Prove me wrong.
Posted by Jtomka
Member since Sep 2022
351 posts
Posted on 9/7/25 at 7:44 am to
Why?
Posted by Jtomka
Member since Sep 2022
351 posts
Posted on 9/7/25 at 7:48 am to
quote:

It would destroy the New World Order.


How would the New World Order be destroyed? What exactly do you envision happening?
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
16402 posts
Posted on 9/7/25 at 12:12 pm to
Just can’t understand why, when trump was campaigning, he said he would expose everything, but now he says it’s a democrat hoax?

It’s clearly not a hoax. People went to jail and some even died
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
98044 posts
Posted on 9/7/25 at 12:16 pm to
He never said he was going to expose the epstein files

You clowms dont need to keep lying

The hoax is hes on the list. And we know thats a hoax

Low iq as always with you
Posted by DownHome
Below the Equator
Member since Jan 2012
11018 posts
Posted on 9/7/25 at 1:00 pm to
Look, what I am going to say will not be a popular opinion.

Do I think Epstein a POS, yes.

Do I think he was trafficking children, usure due to lack of evidence presented to the public.

There is no list, never was. It was made up because of a black address book. Prove it wrong with facts if you think different.

Black address book. Everyone who had a business or a lot of contacts had one of these at that time. Same as before, prove me wrong.

The point I am making is, everything that everyone is arguing about is made up by the general public. I also understand the argument that if they would just release everything then there is no argument.

It's been nothing but a red herring for the general public to get all worked up and distracted.

I have some thoughts on why this all of sudden exploded on the spot.
Posted by Purplehaze
spring, tx
Member since Dec 2003
2357 posts
Posted on 9/7/25 at 1:30 pm to
One thing proven, Marjorie Taylor Green, Macy and Boebert have more cojones than the rest of the male GOP congressmen combined.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 9/7/25 at 1:48 pm to
IMO, the White House (Trump and crew) are trying to protect Epstein’s former next door neighbor and current Trump handler, Howard Lutnick.

After a long week of running his Wall Street hedge fund and naked shorting companies like GME, how easy would it be for Howard to go next door and unwind with Jeffery, Prince Andrew, Ehud and sip on some $500 bottles of whiskey?

Pretty easy.


After a third glass of whiskey the night is not escalating into two or three games of harmless canasta.

Oh no, after the third glass of Pappy Van Winkle, Jeffery breaks open the 8 ball. After the 8 ball then Jeffery brings in the teen girls. It starts with massages and then ends up with child molestations. And Jeffery probably has it all on tape.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 9/7/25 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

Then you support protecting pedos and child sex traffickers. Prove me wrong.


You are not wrong. It’s amazing this even has to be debated. People have lost their fricking minds over this.
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram