- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If Trump ends income taxes for those under $200k per year..
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:13 pm to jclem11
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:13 pm to jclem11
quote:
most regressive form of taxation - consumption taxes - which distortionally affect poor folks.
Paying taxes on what you consume is not regressive.
quote:
The poor can barely afford to survive on their meager incomes
There really aren’t many poor in this country that aren’t poor by choice.
quote:
So tax cuts for the wealthy and ownership class who already own most of the wealth in America? Your statement is a vague, meaningless platitude.
The rich pay the VAST majority of taxes as it is. Your jealousy of them is what is meaningless
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:16 pm to Diego Ricardo
quote:
raise taxes. Any argument beside that w/r/t deficits and public debt is fairy tale fantasies that hang with the best of the left's.
Laffer curve.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:18 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Laffer curve.
The laffer curve idiocy that you believe in is one of the reasons we are in so much debt
They definitely have not found the sweet spot to maximize revenue
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:56 pm to SaintsReportExile
I think it should be all of us or none of us. If the CEO is paying money in, the bank clerk should be too. Once you remove the cost/benefit analysis from the voting booth, it just becomes 88% voting to take the 12%'s money.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 3:01 pm to jclem11
quote:
Taxes are the price to pay for living in an organized society. Most folks don't want to live in your lolbertarian fantasy world.
Agreed that Taxes are the price to pay for a government. The method of taxation does not have to be income taxation. It’s been allowed by a passive citizenry.
If we shift from an income tax base to a consumption tax base, it will attract wealthy productive citizens. Why would we not want that?
The wealthy hardly get any return for carrying the load. They are responsible for the majority of the income tax that is received by the government and what do they get on reform? Curses. Politicians like Obama, Hillary, Biden, Bernie, AOC, Warren all curse the wealthy. They blame the wealthy. They get little in return for their income theft in the way of service from the government.
As for it being unfairly burdensome on the poor, we still have social systems to care for our poor. It doesn’t have to be eliminated. And it can be levied differently on different products. Food doesn’t need to be taxed the same as televisions or cars.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 3:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Always with the pompous, pretentious, condescending, arrogant, smug, better-tha-thou comments. But you're not a liberal, you just act like one right?
And that's in the academic, 2nd grade civics version
Posted on 4/28/25 at 3:28 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote: Isnt it essentially that anyone under 100,000 isnt paying any taxes anyway...
quote:
What?![]()
SFP, you don't seem to be too familiar with tax code. The above is pretty close to actual.
$100,000 of W2 income, MFJ, with 4 dependents not only doesn't pay any Fed Income Tax, they get a check for $458.
Three kids and $87,000 income is no tax FIT.
So no, not 'anyone' (need to have dependents), but it is fairly common.
LINK
Posted on 4/28/25 at 3:40 pm to Powerman
quote:
The laffer curve idiocy
P‘Man isn’t great at the maths.
Popular
Back to top

0





