Started By
Message

re: If Trump ends income taxes for those under $200k per year..

Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:13 pm to
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59466 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

most regressive form of taxation - consumption taxes - which distortionally affect poor folks.


Paying taxes on what you consume is not regressive.

quote:

The poor can barely afford to survive on their meager incomes


There really aren’t many poor in this country that aren’t poor by choice.

quote:

So tax cuts for the wealthy and ownership class who already own most of the wealth in America? Your statement is a vague, meaningless platitude.


The rich pay the VAST majority of taxes as it is. Your jealousy of them is what is meaningless
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59466 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

raise taxes. Any argument beside that w/r/t deficits and public debt is fairy tale fantasies that hang with the best of the left's.


Laffer curve.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173743 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:18 pm to
quote:


Laffer curve.

The laffer curve idiocy that you believe in is one of the reasons we are in so much debt

They definitely have not found the sweet spot to maximize revenue
Posted by TigerBaitOohHaHa
Member since Jan 2023
2070 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 2:56 pm to
I think it should be all of us or none of us. If the CEO is paying money in, the bank clerk should be too. Once you remove the cost/benefit analysis from the voting booth, it just becomes 88% voting to take the 12%'s money.
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
16407 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

Taxes are the price to pay for living in an organized society. Most folks don't want to live in your lolbertarian fantasy world.



Agreed that Taxes are the price to pay for a government. The method of taxation does not have to be income taxation. It’s been allowed by a passive citizenry.

If we shift from an income tax base to a consumption tax base, it will attract wealthy productive citizens. Why would we not want that?
The wealthy hardly get any return for carrying the load. They are responsible for the majority of the income tax that is received by the government and what do they get on reform? Curses. Politicians like Obama, Hillary, Biden, Bernie, AOC, Warren all curse the wealthy. They blame the wealthy. They get little in return for their income theft in the way of service from the government.

As for it being unfairly burdensome on the poor, we still have social systems to care for our poor. It doesn’t have to be eliminated. And it can be levied differently on different products. Food doesn’t need to be taxed the same as televisions or cars.

Posted by RollTide4547
Member since Dec 2024
4723 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

And that's in the academic, 2nd grade civics version
Always with the pompous, pretentious, condescending, arrogant, smug, better-tha-thou comments. But you're not a liberal, you just act like one right?
Posted by MidWestGuy
Illinois
Member since Nov 2018
2002 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

quote: Isnt it essentially that anyone under 100,000 isnt paying any taxes anyway...

quote:

What?



SFP, you don't seem to be too familiar with tax code. The above is pretty close to actual.

$100,000 of W2 income, MFJ, with 4 dependents not only doesn't pay any Fed Income Tax, they get a check for $458.

Three kids and $87,000 income is no tax FIT.

So no, not 'anyone' (need to have dependents), but it is fairly common.


LINK
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59466 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

The laffer curve idiocy




P‘Man isn’t great at the maths.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram