Started By
Message

re: If There Has Ever Been A Litmus Test For Why Democracies Only Last

Posted on 4/4/25 at 11:18 am to
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
33913 posts
Posted on 4/4/25 at 11:18 am to
quote:

Imma' say it has to do with neither, but bald stupidity. You being a prime example of that theory.


I assume you’re packing your luggage for another democracy? Or is it just your shitbag that’s full?

No need to answer. We already know.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
8222 posts
Posted on 4/4/25 at 11:19 am to
quote:

Is this wrong?


Yes, but that's not my point.

My point is that you can't get both outcomes. You can choose to use tariffs to force manufacturing or you can use them to force free trade. You can't use them both ways at the same time.

quote:

Explain this...


It's pretty self evident.

Free trade = more trade globally. Dropping tariffs = more free trade.

Everyone dropping tariffs means that manufacturing jobs will continue to leave the US. If you want to use tariffs to bring jobs back, you can't drop them. You have to keep calling and raising until companies fold and bring the manufacturing back here, and then you have to keep them up to keep the manufacturing here.

quote:

Therefore, the only reason they are cheaper is they are not playing by the same rules as America.


That's completely false, particularly with China and Mexico. Their labor is cheaper because their economy is less developed. China's cost of living is 74% less than the US. They don't need as much money. $6 an hour is all it takes for the average Chinese worker to live like a factory worker here making $24 an hour. The "slave labor" bullshite is just that...it's complete bullshite.

quote:

Ergo, it's perfectly right and just to impose a tariff on these companies even if they reduce their tariffs on US goods to zero


Number one, the argument you just made is exactly why the EU and Canada and other countries are pissed off at the US for raising tariffs even though they have had higher tariffs on us for decades. It's the same argument. They feel entitled to tariff us b/c we don't have as stringent regulations that artificially drive up the cost of production.

So are you o.k. with those countries keeping higher tariffs on us using the same argument you just used to justify us keeping higher tariffs on Mexico and China?

Secondly, it doesn't matter what you or I think is "justifiable," what matters is what you can get other countries to agree to. If they are mad right now because trump wants to even up the tariffs, how do you think they'll respond when he says, "Oh, and btw, you'll be dropping your tariffs, but we won't be dropping ours?"

Sounds like a complete fantasy to me.

China would go to war with us militarily before it would allow that IMO.

Posted by GeauxBurrow312
Member since Nov 2024
2206 posts
Posted on 4/4/25 at 11:21 am to
Populism is not necessarily the problem, certain flavors certainly are (the socialist populists). This country has always had a populist streak to it (Andrew Jackson, Huey Long, McCarthy etc)

The problem is liberal boomers and their obsession with debt. In 1970, the national debt was 371 billion. In just 50 years, the national debt has grown 100x.

The US has been hollowed out to where the economy is entirely reliant on services, we dont actually make anything anymore other than tech products.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
51316 posts
Posted on 4/4/25 at 11:30 am to


It was absolute sarcasm.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
55443 posts
Posted on 4/4/25 at 11:47 am to
quote:

I said it in another topic and I'll say it here: people should be very, very skeptical when that word is used as the rationale for government action.


Or, you take the word in context of the subject...
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
149553 posts
Posted on 4/4/25 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

the Dems rolled this out, the board would be in Chernobyl Melt mode.


There would be zero defense of this had a Dem been president. None.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
25300 posts
Posted on 4/4/25 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

Or, you take the word in context of the subject...


What would that change? "Fair" can mean anything and almost always means something different to different people.
Posted by Jimmy Russel
Member since Nov 2021
559 posts
Posted on 4/5/25 at 7:57 am to
I really wanted to believe that.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram