- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
If the the NYT report is true about Schiff
Posted on 10/2/19 at 1:36 pm
Posted on 10/2/19 at 1:36 pm
Wouldn't that be criminal for Schiff?
10
Posted on 10/2/19 at 1:37 pm to BadBrad29
He will need to defend his false statements
Posted on 10/2/19 at 1:38 pm to BadBrad29
What’s the NYT report say? For those of us who don’t know
Posted on 10/2/19 at 1:39 pm to CamdenTiger
He'll need to defend conspiring with a rogue intelligence agent in an effort to over-throw a legitimately elected government.
Posted on 10/2/19 at 1:41 pm to CBLSU316
quote:
What’s the NYT report say? For those of us who don’t know
Long story short the WBer went to dems before filing the official compliment.
This post was edited on 10/2/19 at 1:43 pm
Posted on 10/2/19 at 1:41 pm to CBLSU316
That a Schiff underlining knew about the WB complaint before anyone else.
Posted on 10/2/19 at 1:42 pm to BadBrad29
He needs to recuse himself from office.
Posted on 10/2/19 at 1:44 pm to SLafourche07
I bet we learn the rules were changed AFTER they knew of this "complaint."
Posted on 10/2/19 at 1:48 pm to BadBrad29
Criminal?
Perhaps. Hard to say without further investigations.
Enough evidence to put into serious question his impartiality in hearings and substantive reason for his removal as chair?
100%.
(But then who could call into question the qualifications and honor of a man who thought it was a good idea to read a parody transcript to open an official hearing?)
Perhaps. Hard to say without further investigations.
Enough evidence to put into serious question his impartiality in hearings and substantive reason for his removal as chair?
100%.
(But then who could call into question the qualifications and honor of a man who thought it was a good idea to read a parody transcript to open an official hearing?)
This post was edited on 10/2/19 at 1:54 pm
Posted on 10/2/19 at 1:49 pm to timdonaghyswhistle
Schiff will need to be the focus of an investigation
Posted on 10/2/19 at 1:49 pm to BadBrad29
It's impossible to know without a thorough investigation. So what we have to do now is subpoena every single communication Schiff has ever made to anyone to see if there's something we can charge him with. And if he balks at that it will be considered obstruction of justice.
Check. Mate.
Check. Mate.
Posted on 10/2/19 at 1:50 pm to timdonaghyswhistle
The Democratic head of the House Intelligence Committee, Representative Adam B. Schiff of California, learned about the outlines of a C.I.A. officer’s concerns that President Trump had abused his power days before the officer filed a whistle-blower complaint, according to a spokesman and current and former American officials.
The early account by the future whistle-blower shows how determined he was to make known his allegations that Mr. Trump asked Ukraine’s government to interfere on his behalf in the 2020 election. It also explains how Mr. Schiff knew to press for the complaint when the Trump administration initially blocked lawmakers from seeing it.
…
The whistle-blower’s decision to offer what amounted to an early warning to the intelligence committee’s Democrats is also sure to thrust Mr. Schiff even more forcefully into the center of the controversy.
Posted on 10/2/19 at 1:50 pm to TideCPA
And this all should be done before one more hearing is held in his committee, as long as he remains chair.
Posted on 10/2/19 at 1:56 pm to BadBrad29
who do we think is behind this NYT Article?
Posted on 10/2/19 at 1:56 pm to BadBrad29
quote:
If the the NYT report is true about Schiff
Wouldn't that be criminal for Schiff?
I'm sure that TigerinDC will be along shortly to tell us that it doesn't matter.
Posted on 10/2/19 at 1:57 pm to Jbird
Here will be Schiff's response:
OBSTRUCTION OBSTRUCTION OBSTRUCTION INTIMIDATION CORRUPTION MASTURBATION, OBSTRUCTION OBSTRUCTION, COLLUSION, INTIMIDATION
OBSTRUCTION OBSTRUCTION OBSTRUCTION INTIMIDATION CORRUPTION MASTURBATION, OBSTRUCTION OBSTRUCTION, COLLUSION, INTIMIDATION
Posted on 10/2/19 at 1:58 pm to BadBrad29
Criminal? Maybe...Maybe not...
Definitely needs investigating and he needs to recuse himself from the impeachment inquiry(or whatever it is called since it isn't a formal inquiry).
Definitely needs investigating and he needs to recuse himself from the impeachment inquiry(or whatever it is called since it isn't a formal inquiry).
Posted on 10/2/19 at 1:58 pm to SLafourche07
quote:
He needs to recuse himself from life.
Posted on 10/2/19 at 1:58 pm to BadBrad29
I'm stunned that the NYT's reported this. There has to be some major underlying issues that are about to be divulged.
Posted on 10/2/19 at 1:58 pm to OchoDedos
quote:Agreed.
I'm stunned that the NYT's reported this. There has to be some major underlying issues that are about to be divulged.
There has to be something else going on or they are trying to get out in front of something.
This post was edited on 10/2/19 at 1:59 pm
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News