- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If Ford just made up her story ...
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:38 pm to texridder
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:38 pm to texridder
quote:
why did she say there was a witness present? Why didn't she say it was just her and Kavanaugh alone?
OK fair enough...she said there was a witness present in an attempt to make her seem credible. If she says it was just her and Kavanaugh, it's a total he said/she said. Witnesses provide validity to a story. Unfortunately for her, the two witnesses she has named have said it never happened. Also, it's not helpful that the story keeps changing.
Now, answer my questions please.
quote:
Please reconcile this for us. Either no one knew or everyone knew...if everyone knew why wasn't this found during his 6 extensive FBI checks??
BTW, I've been through multiple background checks in my 30 year career...I know how this works...just sayin'.
1
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:38 pm to Scruffy
quote:
It happened at some place, at some time, in some year, not sure in any of those details, but it happened at and during them.
Why have a made-up witness then?
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:39 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Texridder is a lawyer I'm told.
The first thing they teach you in law school is to call a witness that doesn't corroborate your story at all, and then say "The Defense rests your honor. We called a witness."
LAWYERED
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:39 pm to texridder
quote:
But likely it will not be resolved one way or the other the way it's going.
And that is the whole point. How have you not figured this out?
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:39 pm to Lobo Apple Sauce
Because Anita Hill’s accusations regarded a time while CT was a government employee. Ford accusations are about a high school party that may or may not have happened at an unspecified time roughly 30 years ago.
This post was edited on 9/19/18 at 3:40 pm
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:40 pm to texridder
quote:
he should at least have to put his denial on the record under oath - be at risk in case he's not telling the whole truth.
What would they ask him under oath to deny, since we are still waiting on the date and location of the alleged event?
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:41 pm to texridder
You must have missed my answer so I'll post it again:
quote:
I'll bite:
Because naming a "witness" would appear to make her story more believable.
It probably took a cursory review of a yearbook or conversations with people who knew Kavanaugh in high school to figure out who he was friends with. Then you go through the names and find someone who doesn't appear to be very trustworthy and name him. Hope that he either hates Trump and wants to play along or will come across as untrustworthy and, at best, be neutral.
Liars usually provide more information than necessary, but since she couldn't pigeonhole herself on location, date, or any other concrete facts, she could provide a "witness".
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:41 pm to texridder
quote:
still can't believe they don't want Judge to testify.
The same reason the fbi won’t touch her allegation. Because an allegation is not evidence. She doesn’t get to send Congress and the fbi on snipe hunts every time she cooks up a new witness. She’s changed her story several times already.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:41 pm to Godfather1
quote:Screen name should be Lobo Hot Sauce since she carries it in her purse.
Yes, Mrs. Clinton. We’re already familiar with your views on this.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:41 pm to texridder
Because it was Judge’s book that gave her the idea for the whole fabrication. It would have just felt wrong not to include him.
Mentioning Judge directs everyone’s attention to his book, and the anecdotes there in turn are supposed to lend credibility to her tall tale.
Mentioning Judge directs everyone’s attention to his book, and the anecdotes there in turn are supposed to lend credibility to her tall tale.
This post was edited on 9/19/18 at 3:42 pm
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:41 pm to texridder
quote:
Why have a made-up witness then?
You think you've got yourself a real "gotcha" with this, don't you?
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:41 pm to texridder
quote:
Why have a made-up witness then?
Why does her reasoning matter?
The witness said it NEVER HAPPENED.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:42 pm to texridder
quote:As others have said, she puts two MALES on the spot in a he said she said involving a me too situation.
Why have a made-up witness then?
You progressives are so ate up by your sexism towards males that you would take her side no matter what. The inconsistencies that she spews or the lack of facts that she gives don’t matter. It’s a woman vs two males, and one is a Republican! Rabble rabble rabble!
Not to mention that they are both famous members of the same class which makes them both recognizable.
And as others have stated Judge’s book was supposed to give her story credence.
This post was edited on 9/19/18 at 3:45 pm
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:44 pm to texridder
quote:
why did she say there was a witness present? Why didn't she say it was just her and Kavanaugh alone? And why did she say that the witness was Mark Judge, Kavanaugh's friend?
So this is the new DU-issued talking point? Good to know.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:45 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Texridder is a lawyer I'm told.
By whom? I don’t think I’ve ever seen him say it. I think he just lets everyone believe it. There are a lot of dumbasses in law school....but I still say there is no way he is a lawyer. So Tex. How bout it. You a lawyer or no?
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:45 pm to texridder
Because Judge has written about partying in his younger days and they’ve been friends since high school, so it gives her story some modicum of a basis in the universe (otherwise would have zero) to try to tie her claim to Kav and to Judge’s stories.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:45 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
By whom?
Hail Hail to Michigan keeps referencing that tex melt is a lawyer
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:46 pm to BeeFense5
I heard from a reliable source that Tex finished in the bottom 5% of his class at Southern Law
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:47 pm to notslim99
And its the most illogical talking point I've ever read.
It borders on insane.
Think about it.
She named a witness so that must lend credibility to her claim.
It is IRRELEVANT that the witness she named says it never happened.
Think about how batshit crazy that is.
Let's put it this way:
You are a lawyer. Your client is on trial for murder. You call 5 witnesses. All 5 witnesses say your client murdered the person. You then argue to the jury that your client must be not guilty, or else why would they call 5 witnesses?
It borders on insane.
Think about it.
She named a witness so that must lend credibility to her claim.
It is IRRELEVANT that the witness she named says it never happened.
Think about how batshit crazy that is.
Let's put it this way:
You are a lawyer. Your client is on trial for murder. You call 5 witnesses. All 5 witnesses say your client murdered the person. You then argue to the jury that your client must be not guilty, or else why would they call 5 witnesses?
Posted on 9/19/18 at 3:47 pm to texridder
BLM: Cop shot a killed a black dude named Cricket!
Cop: Yeah. He threatened me.
BLM: No way. Cricket was on his way to college!
Cop: Well, his buddy Dookie Shoes was there, too
BLM: Oh...you named a witness. I guess you are correct. Have a nice day officer
Cop: Yeah. He threatened me.
BLM: No way. Cricket was on his way to college!
Cop: Well, his buddy Dookie Shoes was there, too
BLM: Oh...you named a witness. I guess you are correct. Have a nice day officer
Page 5 of 22
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News