- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If Ford just made up her story ...
Posted on 9/20/18 at 8:27 pm to blackrose890
Posted on 9/20/18 at 8:27 pm to blackrose890
quote:
Look NC she/he still hasn't acknowledged my post that called him out and answered its questions.
What page is your post on?
1
Posted on 9/20/18 at 8:28 pm to texridder
18
Posted on 9/20/18 at 8:30 pm to the808bass
quote:
On the first page, four people gave answers.
On the second page, three people gave answers.
On the third page, two people answered.
On the fourth page, two people answered.
On the fifth page, six separate answers are supplied.
On the sixth page, six separate answers are given.
On the seventh page, five answers are given.
On the eighth page, four answers are given.
On the ninth page, four answers are given.
On the tenth page, we still have two people actually responding to your troll question.
On the eleventh page, we still get two new responses to your OP.
On the twelfth, we have one.
13th - two and a half with the half being a person pointing out that saying someone is a witness doesn’t mean a crime is committed through the Socratic method.
14th - one
15th - three
16th - two
17th - one
18th - one
In total, 51 separate answers to your question have been given. Some have been short and simple (she’s crazy). Others have been mutiple paragraph answers which point out the obvious logical problems with the underpinnings of your OP.
You’ve received 51 discrete answers. And you’re whining on page 18 that no one will answer your question. I feel sorry for you.
I lied. I don’t feel sorry for you or your other personas on this board. Now frick off.
Absolute destruction of this fricking idiot.
Posted on 9/20/18 at 8:33 pm to texridder
I’m not linking 51 separate responses to your OP. You fricking count. Go do the laundry.
Posted on 9/20/18 at 8:34 pm to Havoc
All you have to see is it’s reaction to my question.
The content of a witnesses statement does not matter, but the fact that they were mentioned as a witness does.
Think about the insanity of that.
The content of a witnesses statement does not matter, but the fact that they were mentioned as a witness does.
Think about the insanity of that.
Posted on 9/20/18 at 8:36 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Don't you think it's odd none to the "party" attendees actually lived at the location, meaning they broke and entered a country club home in broad daylight with neighbors all around?
That is weird.
No. I assumed that it was the house of the 4th male that has not been named.
Posted on 9/20/18 at 8:38 pm to texridder
quote:Because if he was there, ANY of the other witnesses, or someone else might put him there. It would be a gargantuan risk.
why would he put himself at the scene?
Posted on 9/20/18 at 8:43 pm to blackrose890
quote:
This will likely be the last time I respond to you, because you're obviously not reading or posting with honesty or are just deluded.
What page did you respond before page 18?
Posted on 9/20/18 at 8:58 pm to texridder
I never claimed to have replied to you before that, and you are dancing around the unimportant portion of the post. Either get on with acknowledging that my post on page 18 contains answers to your questions or continue your quest of trolling.
Posted on 9/20/18 at 9:07 pm to blackrose890
quote:
I never claimed to have replied to you before that,
What you can't read
This will likely be the last time I respond to you,
What the hell did "the last time" you're going to respond mean?
I tried to find out where you posted. Now you get all pissy and say I am lying and dancing around.
Posted on 9/20/18 at 9:11 pm to texridder
Obviously you want to play games, and I refuse to play this one. I now have confirmation of your lack of good faith and your nature on this board and in this thread. Good night and good luck.
Posted on 9/20/18 at 9:12 pm to blackrose890
It’s his Shtick. Can’t debate the merits so he concentrates on semantics.
This post was edited on 9/20/18 at 9:15 pm
Posted on 9/20/18 at 9:13 pm to blackrose890
quote:
Where have you seen that admission?
What admission?
Posted on 9/20/18 at 9:16 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
It’s his Shtick
It's rather annoying honestly, the funniest is he/she is convinced they can move on to other posts and reel you back in. Willful ignorance once exposed though becomes rather interesting, but psychoanalysis isn't my specialty.
Posted on 9/20/18 at 9:17 pm to texridder
Because Judge wrote a tell all book after getting sober about being a drunk teenager and named one of his HS drinking buddies Bert O'Kavenaugh, or some such shite. She read the book and made this crap up.
Posted on 9/20/18 at 9:24 pm to texridder
Caitlin Jenner is saying Bruce Jenner touched her 20 years ago.
Posted on 9/20/18 at 9:42 pm to RazorBroncs
quote:
Without reading the last 6 pages - Profiling people based off limited information available is somewhat in tune with what I do for a living, and let me just say that this happens ALL THE TIME (i.e. recalling people that were “there” but weren’t, recalling events totally different from how they happened, etc.).
It’s not only possible but almost likely at this point that she’s incorrect in her memory - not “LYING” or making it up out of thin air - because SHE believes she is telling the truth. It’s very common for our minds to “remake” memories, especially from so long ago, and especially to include someone who is “famous” or significant in some way that you may have known. The Mandela Effect partly plays into this, as well as other cognitive abilities our brains have to attach certain time periods in our lives to certain people, places, and things AFTER the fact.
For instance, I went to school with Darren McFadden and was somewhat friends with him. If you were to ask me to recall certain parties and events from that time period I’d most likely imagine him being there, even just as a peripheral guest in the background, whether he was or not.
This lady apparently ran in the same circles with him in their HS days and his career and influence have grown steadily since. She’s most likely followed his story even from a distance, as she “knew that guy growing up.” Now, add 36 years of memories coming and going into the mix, as well as alcohol involved during the event.
She was either so drunk that she imagined it was him doing this (I’ve been drunk before and imagined the person I was with was someone else, usually a crush at the time), or it was someone that somewhat looks like him when drunk, or she’s making it up all together (I don’t think this is the case, fyi). This same train of thought it was the professionals at the FBI believe as well, as they were taught similarly.
My post from earlier in the thread.
I finally remembered the actual term for this: counterfactual thinking
Counterfactual thinking is a concept in psychology that involves the human tendency to create possible alternatives to life events that have already occurred; something that is contrary to what actually happened. Counterfactual thinking is, as it states: "counter to the facts".[1] These thoughts consist of the "What if?" and the "If I had only..." that occur when thinking of how things could have turned out differently. Counterfactual thoughts include things that – in the present – now could never happen in reality because they solely pertain to events that have occurred in the past.[1]
Counterfactual thoughts have been shown to produce negative emotions, however they may also produce functional or beneficial effects. Ideas that create a more negative outcome are downward counterfactuals and those thoughts that create a more positive outcome are considered upward counterfactuals.[1] These counterfactual thoughts, or thoughts of what could have happened, can affect people's emotions, such as causing them to experience regret, guilt, relief, or satisfaction. They can also affect how they view social situations, such as who deserves blame and responsibility.
Posted on 9/20/18 at 9:43 pm to the808bass
quote:
I’m not linking 51 separate responses to your OP. You fricking count. Go do the laundry.
You lying piece of dung. You lied and said that I said to bigblake. I didn't say I didn't get any answers.
This is my post that you were responded to:
bigblake's Post
quote:
When she told the story to the therapist she was in marriage counseling and not thinking about interviewing those witnesses, having it hold up in court, etc...
Your response:
quote:
Probably eighty posters have said the same thing to her. It’s the obvious answer.
My response to you: Y
quote:
ou're FOS as usual. Why don't you post a few of the 80 you say have been posted.
You lied. You said I said I din't receive any answers. What I said was I hadn't received any responses like bigblake's.
I explained all that to you in a post. You ignored that post. You didn't have the guts to give an answer that post.
Posted on 9/20/18 at 9:45 pm to texridder
No matter what semantics you try to argue, you received a serious e-beatdown in this thread and should be ashamed of yourself.
You won’t be, but you should be.
Posted on 9/20/18 at 10:53 pm to RazorBroncs
quote:
No matter what semantics you try to argue, you received a serious e-beatdown in this thread and should be ashamed of yourself.
Gutless wonders like you who post that generalized worthless crap.
Why don't you post an example of how I got beat down.
Page 19 of 22
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News