- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/20/18 at 2:22 pm to texridder
fricking god man it's been answered already DIAF.
Posted on 9/20/18 at 2:22 pm to texridder
quote:
Go away.
What you going to do about it when he doesn't?
Posted on 9/20/18 at 2:37 pm to texridder
This will likely be the last time I respond to you, because you're obviously not reading or posting with honesty or are just deluded.
I will not fetch for you. If you are incapable of reading answers to your questions, then it is a worthless use of my time to find them for you. Further, you tend to ignore the point of any answer and refuse to reciprocate and answer any question pointed to you, preferring to instead argue pointless tangents that delay the point.
I've become quite impressed with your trolling, and know that even if I were to submit an answer you would claim it isn't related to your question and you will not accept any rebuttal that doesn't fit your view of what you think the should be.
If you want my answers they are as follows: by claiming there's a witness it provides another person to verify (the second question is the same as the first) by claiming it is a friend willing to lie she casts a cloud over both men (creating a conspiracy or casting doubt on the character of Kav by association and/or directly). Mind you these answers are repeated in multiple forms throughout the thread.
Now do you accept that the questions are answered, or because they are not the answers you are searching for do you continue to deny?
I will not fetch for you. If you are incapable of reading answers to your questions, then it is a worthless use of my time to find them for you. Further, you tend to ignore the point of any answer and refuse to reciprocate and answer any question pointed to you, preferring to instead argue pointless tangents that delay the point.
I've become quite impressed with your trolling, and know that even if I were to submit an answer you would claim it isn't related to your question and you will not accept any rebuttal that doesn't fit your view of what you think the should be.
If you want my answers they are as follows: by claiming there's a witness it provides another person to verify (the second question is the same as the first) by claiming it is a friend willing to lie she casts a cloud over both men (creating a conspiracy or casting doubt on the character of Kav by association and/or directly). Mind you these answers are repeated in multiple forms throughout the thread.
Now do you accept that the questions are answered, or because they are not the answers you are searching for do you continue to deny?
Posted on 9/20/18 at 2:50 pm to texridder
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/21/18 at 2:23 pm
Posted on 9/20/18 at 2:59 pm to texridder
She says what she is paid to say.
Posted on 9/20/18 at 3:00 pm to texridder
On the first page, four people gave answers.
On the second page, three people gave answers.
On the third page, two people answered.
On the fourth page, two people answered.
On the fifth page, six separate answers are supplied.
On the sixth page, six separate answers are given.
On the seventh page, five answers are given.
On the eighth page, four answers are given.
On the ninth page, four answers are given.
On the tenth page, we still have two people actually responding to your troll question.
On the eleventh page, we still get two new responses to your OP.
On the twelfth, we have one.
13th - two and a half with the half being a person pointing out that saying someone is a witness doesn’t mean a crime is committed through the Socratic method.
14th - one
15th - three
16th - two
17th - one
18th - one
In total, 51 separate answers to your question have been given. Some have been short and simple (she’s crazy). Others have been mutiple paragraph answers which point out the obvious logical problems with the underpinnings of your OP.
You’ve received 51 discrete answers. And you’re whining on page 18 that no one will answer your question. I feel sorry for you.
I lied. I don’t feel sorry for you or your other personas on this board. Now frick off.
On the second page, three people gave answers.
On the third page, two people answered.
On the fourth page, two people answered.
On the fifth page, six separate answers are supplied.
On the sixth page, six separate answers are given.
On the seventh page, five answers are given.
On the eighth page, four answers are given.
On the ninth page, four answers are given.
On the tenth page, we still have two people actually responding to your troll question.
On the eleventh page, we still get two new responses to your OP.
On the twelfth, we have one.
13th - two and a half with the half being a person pointing out that saying someone is a witness doesn’t mean a crime is committed through the Socratic method.
14th - one
15th - three
16th - two
17th - one
18th - one
In total, 51 separate answers to your question have been given. Some have been short and simple (she’s crazy). Others have been mutiple paragraph answers which point out the obvious logical problems with the underpinnings of your OP.
You’ve received 51 discrete answers. And you’re whining on page 18 that no one will answer your question. I feel sorry for you.
I lied. I don’t feel sorry for you or your other personas on this board. Now frick off.
This post was edited on 9/20/18 at 3:01 pm
Posted on 9/20/18 at 3:19 pm to the808bass
But I know yall wanted that 808, can you feel the B A S S Bass
Posted on 9/20/18 at 3:26 pm to the808bass
quote:
On the first page, four people gave answers.
On the second page, three people gave answers.
On the third page, two people answered.
On the fourth page, two people answered.
On the fifth page, six separate answers are supplied.
On the sixth page, six separate answers are given.
On the seventh page, five answers are given.
On the eighth page, four answers are given.
On the ninth page, four answers are given.
On the tenth page, we still have two people actually responding to your troll question.
On the eleventh page, we still get two new responses to your OP.
On the twelfth, we have one.
13th - two and a half with the half being a person pointing out that saying someone is a witness doesn’t mean a crime is committed through the Socratic method.
14th - one
15th - three
16th - two
17th - one
18th - one
In total, 51 separate answers to your question have been given. Some have been short and simple (she’s crazy). Others have been mutiple paragraph answers which point out the obvious logical problems with the underpinnings of your OP.
You’ve received 51 discrete answers.
texcritter: "Nuh-uh!"
Posted on 9/20/18 at 5:25 pm to the808bass
quote:
In total, 51 separate answers to your question have been given. Some have been short and simple (she’s crazy). Others have been mutiple paragraph answers which point out the obvious logical problems with the underpinnings of your OP.
You’ve received 51 discrete answers. And you’re whining on page 18 that no one will answer your question. I feel sorry for you.
Are you a compulsive liar?
I didn't post on page 18.
On page 17 I responded to a post from you to bigblake, and I didn't whine that no one will answer my question.
Here was bigblake's post that you responded to:
quote:And this is your response to bigblake:
When she told the story to the therapist she was in marriage counseling and not thinking about interviewing those witnesses, having it hold up in court, etc...
quote:
Probably eighty posters have said the same thing to her.
In response to your post to bigblake, I challenged you to post the 80 posts that said the same thing as bigblake.
But, instead of posting resposes that said the same thing as bigblake's, you listsed ALL the answers I received.
You flat out lied, plain and simple. Pitiful.
Posted on 9/20/18 at 6:01 pm to texridder
Man...I gotta give it to you for persistence. I assume that means you still think Kav won’t be seated? Posted on 9/20/18 at 7:05 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Man...I gotta give it to you for persistence. I assume that means you still think Kav won’t be seated?
I don't know. The Republicans have to have a Justice in place before the midterms, so they might have to be all-all-in on Kavanaugh.
On the other hand, I would be very apprehensive if I was a Democrat and had to rely on the ability of Ford to stand up to testifying.
If Ford can't negotiate the committee to consider the testimony of Judge and the other male at the party (according to Ford), I think the chance of his not being confirmed goes down.
If it's one-on-one, Kavanaugh is a pro at handling questioning - Ford, obviously, not so much.
I'd say it's 65-35 in favor of confirmation, trending down, but slowing.
Posted on 9/20/18 at 7:07 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
I gotta give it to you for persistence
Notice he didn't respond to my answers, and instead argues with you.
Posted on 9/20/18 at 7:14 pm to texridder
quote:We now know Blasey Ford apparently named the others present. So whose house was it?
If Ford just made up her story ...
Did the kids break and enter?
Why were they at the location?
Posted on 9/20/18 at 7:21 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Did the kids break and enter?
Why were they at the location?
Don't know, but apparently, Kavanaugh thinks he has an idea of the location of the house at which the party was held.
Posted on 9/20/18 at 7:26 pm to NC_Tigah
Look NC she/he still hasn't acknowledged my post that called him out and answered its questions.
This post was edited on 9/20/18 at 7:27 pm
Posted on 9/20/18 at 7:28 pm to texridder
quote:If Ford's story is accurate, Kavanaugh would have admitted it in some form. The SoL is long-expired. It's a she-said-he-said. It was high school. She exaggerated, I was tickling her. Whatever.
Kavanaugh is a pro at handling questioning
The woman claims there were witnesses, and she's named them. Kavanaugh is committing a career-ending crime if he lies under oath. He'd be lying to cover up something which would not only not be career-ending, it might not even prohibit his ascent to the SCOTUS.
That makes no sense either.
Posted on 9/20/18 at 7:39 pm to texridder
quote:You don't think that's important?
Don't know,
You began the thread with a question which was reasonable, as are some of the answers posed.
Now one is posed in return:
Don't you think it's odd none to the "party" attendees actually lived at the location, meaning they broke and entered a country club home in broad daylight with neighbors all around?
That is weird.
quote:He may. And that knowledge may well be exculpatory.
Don't know, but apparently, Kavanaugh thinks he has an idea of the location of the house at which the party was held.
This post was edited on 9/20/18 at 7:40 pm
Posted on 9/20/18 at 8:03 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
If Ford's story is accurate, Kavanaugh would have admitted it in some form. The SoL is long-expired. It's a she-said-he-said. It was high school. She exaggerated, I was tickling her. Whatever.
That may be true, but if he thought he could just deny it and ride it out, why would he put himself at the scene?
Posted on 9/20/18 at 8:10 pm to texridder
Where have you seen that admission?
Page 18 of 22
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News