- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
If anyone receives funds from Trump’s IRS suit, Gavin plans to tax those funds at 100%
Posted on 5/28/26 at 7:01 am
Posted on 5/28/26 at 7:01 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. An IRS contractor illegally leaked President Trumps’ tax returns.
Trump sued the IRS for $10 Billion, and won!
Trump said I don’t want your money, and voluntarily dropped the lawsuit with prejudice In exchange for a formal apology and to establish an “Anti-Weaponization Fund” with $1.7B in it for those who were politically targeted and became victims of government “weaponization” or “lawfare”
Now…. Gavin Newsome says if anyone in his state recieves those funds, he will TAX them 100%
11
Posted on 5/28/26 at 7:03 am to Placekicker
Wish these states were scared of Trump but they aren't.
Posted on 5/28/26 at 7:03 am to Placekicker
Trump is merciful. 
Posted on 5/28/26 at 7:05 am to Placekicker
quote:
Anti-Weaponization Fund” with $1.7B
What an idiotic notion this was. Surely someone told them how bad of an idea it is on the front end.
Posted on 5/28/26 at 7:10 am to Placekicker
quote:
Trump sued the IRS for $10 Billion, and won!
Posted on 5/28/26 at 7:11 am to Placekicker
Yea let’s see how that works out.
Posted on 5/28/26 at 7:15 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
boosiebadazz
He got the fricking money, so he won.
Posted on 5/28/26 at 7:20 am to Placekicker
Is this even legal? 100% tax?
Posted on 5/28/26 at 7:21 am to Wildcat1996
Well, kangs are good now, right?
Posted on 5/28/26 at 7:28 am to Placekicker
Yeah, the evil DemoRats have sent out the memo on this topic and it appears they're planning on doing the same thing in New Yuk, I mean New York.
How 'bout we tax the politicians who get richer beyond belief with a hefty tax increase. They're always attacking the billionaires, let's take it to those money-grubbing, blood-sucking politicians.
How 'bout we tax the politicians who get richer beyond belief with a hefty tax increase. They're always attacking the billionaires, let's take it to those money-grubbing, blood-sucking politicians.
Posted on 5/28/26 at 7:28 am to RohanGonzales
quote:
He got the fricking money, so he won.
He sued himself, so he couldn't lose
Posted on 5/28/26 at 7:36 am to Wildcat1996
quote:
Is this even legal? 100% tax?
They don’t care so much about legal. They’ll do it, then dare you to stop them.
This post was edited on 5/28/26 at 7:38 am
Posted on 5/28/26 at 7:51 am to Indefatigable
quote:
What an idiotic notion this was. Surely someone told them how bad of an idea it is on the front end.
The better idea was abolishing the the IRS
Posted on 5/28/26 at 7:57 am to Placekicker
Isn’t this considered a bill of attainder, like trying to seize the bonuses of the people at AIG who stayed around to wind things down after the 2008 financial crash?
Posted on 5/28/26 at 8:13 am to Placekicker
The J6 persecution continues in the blue states
This post was edited on 5/28/26 at 8:14 am
Posted on 5/28/26 at 8:16 am to LawTalkingGuy
Did he also have to apologize to himself?
Not sure you’re being fully honest with yourself.
Not sure you’re being fully honest with yourself.
Posted on 5/28/26 at 8:21 am to LawTalkingGuy
“ He sued himself, so he couldn't lose”
Trump didn’t sue himself but rather the entity that harmed him. He personally didn’t collect a dime right? Him understanding that lawfare ( a reference denied happening by some on this board) caused harm to many by just being affiliated to Trump needed relief. Now if case against Pelosi gets traction in civil court that would be great
Posted on 5/28/26 at 8:32 am to RohanGonzales
Winning implies adverse parties.
Absconded would be the more accurate verb.
Absconded would be the more accurate verb.
This post was edited on 5/28/26 at 8:41 am
Posted on 5/28/26 at 8:58 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Not sure you’re being fully honest with yourself.
The IRS data theft occurred while Trump was President, and he then sued his own administration for damages, more than a year after the statute of limitations had run.
Im being facetious ro say "he sued himself" but anyone can see the conflicts of interest and potential for self dealing when his own DOJ agrees to settle a lawsuit the judge was about to dismiss.
Have you wondered why the DOJ did not offer to pay any damages to the other litigants who were damaged by the same breach...and filed suit within the statute of limitations? In those cases the DOJ argued the IRS can not be held liable for actions of an independent contractor.
Maybe those litigants can apply for money under the anti-weaponization fund.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News