- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If anyone receives funds from Trump’s IRS suit, Gavin plans to tax those funds at 100%
Posted on 5/28/26 at 9:02 am to Wildcat1996
Posted on 5/28/26 at 9:02 am to Wildcat1996
quote:
Is this even legal? 100% tax?
It's not. It's an unconstitutional seizure of property and since money is fungible, the "just compensation" is the face value (even presuming due process exists).
Oh, and as this will be done "under color of law" it will give rise to a 1983 action, which will also afford damages and attorney's fees.
FYI, New York is proposing the same retardation.
This post was edited on 5/28/26 at 9:03 am
Posted on 5/28/26 at 9:32 am to Placekicker
I think that they're getting desperate. They see their gravy train is about to crash bigly. They're gonna siphon whatever money they can and distribute it to their cronies before the jig is up. They're gonna need the favor returned when everybody starts getting indictments.
Posted on 5/28/26 at 9:32 am to LawTalkingGuy
quote:
Have you wondered why the DOJ did not offer to pay any damages to the other litigants who were damaged by the same breach...and filed suit within the statute of limitations? In those cases the DOJ argued the IRS can not be held liable for actions of an independent contractor.
Someone “wondering” would necessitate the ability for independent thought. That’s not a cult strong suit.
Posted on 5/28/26 at 9:44 am to Placekicker
quote:
Gavin Newsome says if anyone in his state recieves those funds, he will TAX them 100%
Only because it is Trump. Severe TDS!
Posted on 5/28/26 at 10:10 am to Placekicker
All the more reason to move out of Commieformia.
Posted on 5/28/26 at 10:18 am to tigersbh
Gavin may tax Californians for that payment but I am very sure the payments will all go to noncitizens of California. Even the ones that are citizens for a day in DC, Maryland, Texas wherever they chose.
Posted on 5/28/26 at 10:52 am to LawTalkingGuy
quote:
and he then sued his own administration for damages
You are being disingenuous and you know it. Lifelong civil servants don’t “belong“ to each incoming president. They may serve their agencies through several presidents. Trump rightfully sued a government employee who had wronged him. This isn’t that hard to understand.
Posted on 5/28/26 at 2:17 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
You are being disingenuous and you know it.
quote:
Trump rightfully sued a government employee who had wronged him. This isn’t that hard to understand.
You are completely ignorant, and you dont know it.
The Trump and the Trump Organization sued the IRS and the Treasury Department, not an individual.
The person who stole the data of thousands of wealthy individuals and provided it to the NY Times was an independent contractor and is currently in prison for his crimes. He was not a defendant in Trump's lawsuit.
Look, you didn't know all this, and that's fine. But dont try to throw insults at me when you are uninformed.
This post was edited on 5/28/26 at 2:50 pm
Posted on 5/28/26 at 3:05 pm to LawTalkingGuy
If the Irs allowed it, that’s on them. Trump sued & won.
It wasn’t HIS fockin IRS. You pretending otherwise is ridiculous.
It wasn’t HIS fockin IRS. You pretending otherwise is ridiculous.
Posted on 5/28/26 at 3:21 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Trump sued & won.
Trump sued and settled
quote:
It wasn’t HIS fockin IRS. You pretending otherwise is ridiculous.
He was POTUS when it happened. He is POTUS now. He is in charge of the Treasury Dept., the IRS, and the DOJ representing them. There are serious conflicts issues here, and the Judge had asked for briefing on whether the court even had jurisdiction under this scenario.
You really should sit this one out.
Posted on 5/28/26 at 3:21 pm to Placekicker
Please god, let every city in California have it's Customs agency removed.
Posted on 5/28/26 at 3:23 pm to captainFid
Posted on 5/28/26 at 3:26 pm to Placekicker
Why do yall care if he taxes those undercover Antifa agents at 100%?
Posted on 5/28/26 at 3:29 pm to LawTalkingGuy
quote:
He is in charge of the Treasury Dept., the IRS, and the DOJ representing them. There are serious conflicts issues here, and the Judge had asked for briefing on whether the court even had jurisdiction under this scenario.
I don't know how this passes the smell test for anyone, honestly.
If a Democratic POTUS did that, this site would have crashed.
Posted on 5/28/26 at 4:10 pm to Placekicker
He can't do that. If he did, he'd get sued and have to pay a lot more.
Posted on 5/28/26 at 5:40 pm to LawTalkingGuy
Listen you little socksucker, many people in the government were actively working against Trump in his first term and afterwards. Shove that “sit this one out” comment all the way up your backhole you dumb mother
This post was edited on 5/28/26 at 5:51 pm
Popular
Back to top


0







