- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Idiot sheriff and chief of police put Flock cameras around the county
Posted on 7/23/25 at 2:15 pm to Schleynole
Posted on 7/23/25 at 2:15 pm to Schleynole
quote:
I'm sure cameras watching your every move will reduce crime but that's a terrible trade off
And that’s not what the trade off is here.
0
Posted on 7/23/25 at 2:24 pm to Purple Spoon
quote:
The brother and husband to the sister in law will get the overpriced, overbudget contract for installation.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 2:40 pm to Schleynole
quote:
It's rural and voted 85 percent for Trump if that gives you an indication what the population is like. Crime is basically zero. I don't get it, it feels like big government keeping an eye on us. Anybody else dealing with this bs?
Follow the money.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 3:04 pm to Breaux
quote:
Reads license plates to identify stolen vehicles/plates, wanted criminals or vehicles associated with crimes.
The software does much more tracking than that—and that’s where the problem lies.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 3:49 pm to Purple Spoon
Small agencies with small budgets get access to grants for community safety projects all the time.
Posted on 7/23/25 at 9:44 pm to Schleynole
quote:
I'm sure cameras watching your every move will reduce crime but that's a terrible trade off
Why? These cameras are out in public. Anyone can see you in public. They can take your picture. So what? You are in public.
I understand privacy concerns. But this isn't a private area, it is public. The cameras are not in your home.
I believe these cameras will make me safer by helping to track criminals. I'm really not concerned that a government camera can snap my picture while I'm out in public where anyone can see me anyhow. I just don't see what freedoms I'm giving up to get some added safety for me and my family.
Should I be concerned? Why?
Posted on 7/23/25 at 9:44 pm to Marco Esquandolas
quote:
The software does much more tracking than that—and that’s where the problem lies.
Such as?
Posted on 7/23/25 at 9:47 pm to Schleynole
Black spray paint
Posted on 7/23/25 at 10:02 pm to Schleynole
quote:Then don’t leave the house and you’ll get the crime reduction without the hit to “privacy” (which, pst, you don’t actually have in public). Simple fix
I'm sure cameras watching your every move will reduce crime but that's a terrible trade off
This post was edited on 7/23/25 at 10:04 pm
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:17 am to Schleynole
He got a grant
Posted on 7/24/25 at 5:25 am to Schleynole
quote:I remember in the 1990s thinking my county was safe and wholesome, and then the national news announced my county as the best place in America to hire a hitman.
Less than 5000 people live in the county. It's rural and voted 85 percent for Trump if that gives you an indication what the population is like. Crime is basically zero.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 6:20 am to tharre4
quote:
Automatic License Plate Reader Map
Posted on 7/24/25 at 6:30 am to Schleynole
quote:
When you trade your liberty for security you get neither.
They put them on Public roads. Your vehicle doesn’t have right to privacy on a public highway. These cameras help solve countless crimes everyday. There was a murder solved recently in my area using a Flock camera. Cameras don’t go to sleep, call in sick or cost overtime. They are a great technology addition for law enforcement.
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News